Cover not available

Squib published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 20:2 (2019) ► pp.375–390

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Research report

The situational context and the reliability of an adult model influence infants’ imitation

 | Uppsala University
Published online: 7 October 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18065.ste
Abstract
Four studies examined 15- to 16-month-olds’ imitation of a model’s novel action with a familiar or an unfamiliar object. The infants observed a reliable or an unreliable model demonstrating a novel action with the object in a solitary observational (Study 1, 44 infants; Study 3, 40 infants) or in an interactive (Study 2, 48 infants; Study 4, 44 infants) context. The model’s reliability was manipulated by having the model acting competently or incompetently with different familiar objects. In two out of four studies infants imitated the model’s behavior when the model had previously shown to be reliable than when the model had been unreliable. The infants’ motivation to imitate was related to whether the reliable model interacted with the infants during object demonstration. More infants imitated the reliable model, who demonstrated the objects while interacting with the infants, than the reliable model who behaved in a disinterested manner during object demonstration.
Article outline
  • The current research
  • Study 1: Familiar object – no interaction
    • Method
      • Experimental conditions
        • Demonstration phase
        • Imitation phase
      • Procedure
        • Setting and objects
      • Coding and reliability
      • Manipulation checks
      • Measures of infant variables
        • Demonstration phase
        • Imitation phase
    • Results
    • Discussion
  • Study 2: Familiar object with interaction
    • Method
      • Experimental conditions
      • Procedure
        • Setting and objects
      • Coding and reliability
      • Manipulation checks
      • Measures of infant variables
        • Demonstration phase
        • Imitation phase
    • Results
    • Discussion
  • Study 1 vs. Study 2
  • Study 3: Unfamiliar object – no interaction
    • Method
      • Experimental conditions
      • Procedure
        • Setting and objects
      • Coding and reliability
      • Manipulation checks
      • Measures of infant variables
        • Demonstration phase
        • Imitation phase
    • Results
    • Discussion
  • Study 4: Unfamiliar object with interaction
    • Method
      • Experimental conditions
      • Procedure
        • Setting and objects
      • Coding and reliability
      • Manipulation checks
      • Measures of infant variables
        • Demonstration phase
        • Imitation phase
    • Results
    • Discussion
  • Study 3 vs. Study 4
    • General discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (25)
References
Brooker, I., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2013). Is a bird an apple? The effect of speaker labeling accuracy on infants’ word learning, imitation, and helping behaviors. Infancy, 18(s1), E46–E68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brugger, A., Lariviere, L. A., Mumme, D. L., & Bushnell, E. W. (2007). Doing the right thing: Infants’ selection of actions to imitate from observed event sequences. Child Development, 78(3), 806–824. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, L. P., & Markman, E. M. (2012). Preschoolers use intentional and pedagogical cues to guide inductive inferences and exploration. Child Development, 83(4), 1416–1428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Fourteen- through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development, 21(2), 315–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in cognitive sciences, 13(4), 148–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Floor, P., & Akhtar, N. (2006). Can 18-month-old infants learn words by listening in on conversations? Infancy, 9(3), 327–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, P. L., & Corriveau, K. H. (2011). Young children’s selective trust in informants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B, 3661, 1179–1187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heyes, C. M. (2013). What can imitation do for cooperation? In K. Sterelny, R. Joyce, B. Calcott & B. Fraser (Eds.), Cooperation and its evolution (pp. 313–333). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Király, I., Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2013). Beyond rational imitation: Learning arbitrary means actions from communicative demonstrations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(2), 471–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Király, I. (2009). The effect of the model’s presence and of negative evidence on infants’ selective imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(1), 14–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matheson, H., Moore, C., & Akhtar, N. (2013). The development of social learning in interactive and observational contexts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(2), 161–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. (2007a). ‘‘Like me’’: A foundation for social cognition. Developmental Science, 10(1), 126–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007b). The “like me” framework for recognizing and becoming an intentional agent. Acta Psychologica, 124(1), 26–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moraru, C.-A., Gomez, J.-C., & McGuigan, N. (2016). Developmental changes in the influence of conventional and instrumental cues on over-imitation in 3- to 6-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1451, 34–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, M., Cucchiaro, J., & Mohamedally, J. (2012). When the transmission of culture is child’s play. PLoS One, 7(3). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, M. (2006). Copying actions and copying outcomes: Social learning through the second year. Developmental Psychology, 42(3), 555–565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, M., Simcock, G., & Jenkins, L. (2008). The effect of social engagement on 24-month-olds’ imitation from live and televised models. Developmental Science, 11(5), 722–731. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poulin-Dubois, D., Brooker, I., & Polonia, A. (2011). Infants prefer to imitate a reliable person. Infant Behavior and Development, 34(2), 303–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2008). The sources of normativity: young children’s awareness of the normative structure of games. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 875–881. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shimpi, P. M., Akhtar, N., & Moore, C. (2013). Toddlers’ imitative learning in interactive and observational contexts: the role of age and familiarity of the model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(2), 309–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shneidman, L., Todd, R., & Woodward, A. L. (2014). Why do directed interactions support imitative learning in young children? PLoS ONE, 9(10). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zmyj, N., Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M., & Daum, M. M. (2010). The reliability of a model influences 14-month-olds’ imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(4), 208–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, D., Sidman, J., & Bushnell, E. W. (2010). Beyond the information given: Infants’ transfer of actions learned through imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 62–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Stenberg, Gunilla
2020. Infant imitation in a third-party context. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 21:3 ► pp. 387 ff. DOI logo
Stenberg, Gunilla
2023. Infants’ imitative learning from third-party observations. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 24:3 ► pp. 464 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue