Article published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 22:1 (2021) ► pp.86–109
Groups in human-agent interaction
Effect of synchronous robot motion on human synchrony and enjoyment perception
Published online: 17 September 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18027.men
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18027.men
Abstract
Enhancing synchronization among people when synchronization is lacking is believed to improve their social skills,
learning processes, and proficiency in musical rhythmic development. Greater synchronization among people can be induced to
improve the rhythmic interaction of a system with multiple dancing robots that dance to a drum beat. A series of experiments were
conducted to examine the human–human synchrony between persons that participated in musical sessions with robots. In this study,
we evaluated: (a) the effect of the number of robots on a subject’s ability to synchronize with an experimenter; (b) the effect of
the type of robot synchrony, namely, whether the robots did or did not represent the subject’s rhythm; (c) the effect of an
in-sync and out-of-sync robot on a subject’s behavior. We found that: (a) three robots increased the level of synchronization
between the subject and experimenter and their enjoyment level; (b) robots may induce greater synchronization between the subject
and experimenter by reproducing the rhythms of not only the experimenter but also of the subject compared to when only the
experimenter’s rhythms had been reproduced; (c) the robots in-sync had greater influence on the natural rhythm of the subject.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Experiment 1
- Method
- Subjects
- Experimental setup
- Humanoid robots
- Rhythm detection system
- Environment
- Procedure
- Evaluation
- Results
- Experiment 2
- Method
- Subjects
- Experimental setup
- Procedure
- Evaluation
- Results
- Experiment 3
- Method
- Subjects
- Experimental setup
- Environment
- Procedure
- Evaluation
- Results
- Discussion
- Limitations
- Conclusion
References
References (54)
Alimardani, M., Nishio, S., & Ishiguro, H. (2013). Humanlike
robot hands controlled by brain activity arouse illusion of ownership in operators. Scientific
reports, 31, 2396.
(2014). Effect
of biased feedback on motor imagery learning in BCI-teleoperation system. Frontiers in systems
neuroscience, 81, 52.
Arimoto, T., Yoshikawa, Y., & Ishiguro, H. (2018). Multiple-Robot
Conversational Patterns for Concealing Incoherent Responses. International Journal of Social
Robotics, 1–11.
Avrunin, E., Hart, J., Douglas, A., & Scassellati, B. (2011, March). Effects
related to synchrony and repertoire in perceptions of robot
dance. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on
Human-robot
interaction (pp. 93–100). ACM.
Barsade, S. G. (2002). The
ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 47(4), 644–675.
Bhide, A., Power, A., & Goswami, U. (2013). A
rhythmic musical intervention for poor readers: A comparison of efficacy with a letter-based
intervention. Mind, Brain, and
Education, 7(2), 113–123.
Blakemore et al. (1999). Spatio-Temporal
Prediction Modulates the Perception of Self-Produced Stimuli, Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 11:5, pp.551–559.
Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2014). How
robots can affect human behavior: Investigating the effects of robotic displays of protest and
distress. International Journal of Social
Robotics, 6(3), 343–355.
Brown, S. (2000). Evolutionary
models of music: From sexual selection to group
selection. In Perspectives in
ethology (pp. 231–281). Springer, Boston, MA.
Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party
over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of
personality and social
psychology, 85(5), 808.
Crick, C., Munz, M., & Scassellati, B. (2006, September). Synchronization
in social tasks: Robotic drumming. In Robot and Human Interactive
Communication, 2006. ROMAN
2006. (pp. 97–102). The 15th IEEE International Symposium.
David, D., Wade-Woolley, L., Kirby, J., Smithrim, K. (2007). Rhythm
and reading development in school-age children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Research in
Reading. Volume 30, Issue 2, 169–183.
Eerola, T., Luck, G., & Toiviainen, P. (2006, August). An
investigation of pre-schoolers’ corporeal synchronization with
music. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on music
perception and
cognition (pp. 472–476). The Society for Music Perception and Cognition and European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music Bologna.
Gan, L., Huang, Y., Zhou, L., Qian, C., & Wu, X. (2015). Synchronization
to a bouncing ball with a realistic motion trajectory. Scientific
reports, 51, 11974.
Hoffman, G., & Vanunu, K. (2013). Effects
of Robotic Companionship on Music Enjoyment and Agent
Perception. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International
Conference on Human-Robot
Interaction (pp. 317–324). IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems Int’l Workshop on Human-Agent Interaction.
Hove, M. J., Iversen, J. R., Zhang, A., & Repp, B. H. (2013). Synchronization
with competing visual and auditory rhythms: bouncing ball meets metronome. Psychological
Research, 77(4), 388–398.
Iio, T., Yoshikawa, Y., & Ishiguro, H. (2016, October). Pre-scheduled
turn-taking between robots to make conversation
coherent. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on
Human Agent
Interaction (pp. 19–25). ACM.
Iqbal, T., Moosaei, M., & Riek, L. D. (2016). Tempo
adaptation and anticipation methods for human-robot teams. RSS, Planning for HRI: Shared
Autonomy and Collab. Robotics Work.
Jaffe, J., Beebe, B., Feldstein, S., Crown, C. L., Jasnow, M. D., Rochat, P., & Stern, D. N. (2001). Rhythms
of dialogue in infancy: Coordinated timing in development. Monographs of the society for
research in child development, i–149.
Kawasaki, M., Yamada, Y., Ushiku, Y., Miyauchi, E., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2013). Inter-brain
synchronization during coordination of speech rhythm in human-to-human social
interaction. Scientific
reports, 31, 1692.
Kose-Bagci, H., Dautenhahn, K., & Nehaniv, C. L. (2008, August). Emergent
dynamics of turn-taking interaction in drumming games with a humanoid
robot. In RO-MAN 2008-The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot
and Human Interactive
Communication (pp. 346–353). IEEE.
LaGasse, A. B., & Hardy, M. W. (2013). Rhythm,
movement, and autism: using rhythmic rehabilitation research as a model for autism. Frontiers
in integrative neuroscience, 71, 19.
Lenggenhager, B., Tadi, T., Metzinger, T., & Blanke, O. (2007). Video
ergo sum: manipulating bodily
self-consciousness. Science, 317(5841), 1096–1099.
Ma, K., & Hommel, B. (2015). The
role of agency for perceived ownership in the virtual hand illusion. Consciousness and
cognition, 361, 277–288.
Mates, J. (1994). A
model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence. Biological
cybernetics, 70(5), 463–473.
McNeill, W. H. (2009). Keeping
Together in Time: Dance and Drill in Human History. Harvard Univ. Press.
Merker, B. (1999). Synchronous
chorusing and the origins of music. Musicae
Scientiae, 3(1_suppl), 59–73.
Michalowski, M. P., Sabanovic, S., & Kozima, H. (2007, March). A
dancing robot for rhythmic social interaction. In 2nd ACM/IEEE
International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI),
2007 (pp. 89–96). IEEE.
Michalowski, M. P., Simmons, R., & Kozima, H. (2009, September). Rhythmic
attention in child-robot dance play. In Robot and Human Interactive
Communication, 2009. RO-MAN 2009. The 18th IEEE International Symposium
on (pp. 816–821). IEEE.
Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K., & Macrae, C. N. (2009). The
rhythm of rapport: Interpersonal synchrony and social perception. Journal of experimental
social
psychology, 45(3), 585–589.
Milgram, S., Bickman, L., & Berkowitz, L. (1969). Note
on the drawing power of crowds of different size. Journal of personality and social
psychology, 13(2), 79.
Mörtl, A., Lorenz, T., & Hirche, S. (2014). Rhythm
patterns interaction-synchronization behavior for human-robot joint action. PloS
one, 9(4), e95195.
Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Brechet, Y., Vicsek, T., & Barabási, A. L. (2000). Tumultuous
applause can transform itself into waves of synchronized
clapping. Nature, 403(6772), 849–850.
Nishio, S., Watanabe, T., Ogawa, K., & Ishiguro, H. (2012, October). Body
ownership transfer to teleoperated android robot. In International
Conference on Social
Robotics (pp. 398–407). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Overy, K. (2012). Making
music in a group: synchronization and shared experience. Annals of the New York Academy of
Sciences, 1252(1), 65–68.
Pikovsky, A., Rosenblum, M., & Kurths, J. (2003). Synchronization:
a universal concept in nonlinear
sciences (Vol. 121). Cambridge university press.
Rau, P. L. P., Li, Y., & Liu, J. (2013). Effects
of a social robot’s autonomy and group orientation on human decision-making. Advances in
Human-Computer Interaction, 2013, 111.
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R. W., Goodman, J. R., & Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rocking
together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human movement
science, 26(6), 867–891.
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2005). Effects
of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 31(1), 62.
Roederer, J. G. (1984). The
search for a survival value of music. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary
Journal, 1(3), 350–356.
Schloss, W. A. (1985). On
the automatic transcription of percussive music – From acoustic signals to high-level
analysis (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University).
Schmidt, R. C., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phase
transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between
people. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and
performance, 16(2), 227.
Scothern, P. M. T. (1992). The
music-archaeology of the Palaeolithic within its cultural setting (Doctoral
dissertation, University of Cambridge).
Slater, M., Pérez–Marcos, D., Ehrsson, H., & Sanchez–Vives, M. V. (2008). Towards
a digital body: the virtual arm illusion. Frontiers in human
neuroscience, 21, 6.
Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2005). The
rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 31(1), 80.
Valdesolo, P., Ouyang, J., & DeSteno, D. (2010). The
rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology, 46(4), 693–695.
van Ulzen, N. R., Lamoth, C. J., Daffertshofer, A., Semin, G. R., & Beek, P. J. (2008). Characteristics
of instructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking
side-by-side. Neuroscience
letters, 432(2), 88–93.
Van Vugt, F. T., Ritter, J., Rollnik, J. D., & Altenmüller, E. (2014). Music-supported
motor training after stroke reveals no superiority of synchronization in group
therapy. Frontiers in human
neuroscience, 81, 315.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Zhong, Shu
Meneses, Alexis, Hamed Mahzoon, Yuichiro Yoshikawa & Hiroshi Ishiguro
Rogel, Amit, Richard Savery, Ning Yang & Gil Weinberg
Šabanović, Selma, Malte Jung, Ana Paiva & Friederike Eyssel
2021. Special section editorial. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 22:1 ► pp. 81 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
