Cover not available

Article published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 20:2 (2019) ► pp.234–255

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The perception of a robot partner’s effort elicits a sense of commitment to human-robot interaction

 | Central European University
 | University of Warwick
 | Università di Genova | Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia
 | Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia
 | Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia
 | University of Warwick
Published online: 7 October 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18001.sze
Abstract
Previous research has shown that the perception that one’s partner is investing effort in a joint action can generate a sense of commitment, leading participants to persist longer despite increasing boredom. The current research extends this finding to human-robot interaction. We implemented a 2-player version of the classic snake game which became increasingly boring over the course of each round, and operationalized commitment in terms of how long participants persisted before pressing a ‘finish’ button to conclude each round. Participants were informed that they would be linked via internet with their partner, a humanoid robot. Our results reveal that participants persisted longer when they perceived what they believed to be cues of their robot partner’s effortful contribution to the joint action. This provides evidence that the perception of a robot partner’s effort can elicit a sense of commitment to human-robot interaction.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Material
    • 2.3Procedure
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Main analysis
    • 3.2Secondary analyses
      • 3.2.1ANOVA
      • 3.2.2Linear regression
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (38)
References
Bainbridge, W. A., Hart, J., Kim, E. S., & Scassellati, B. (2008, August). The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2008. RO-MAN 2008. The 17th IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 701–706). IEEE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breazeal, C., Brooks, A., Gray, J., Hoffman, G., Kidd, C., Lee, H., … & Mulanda, D. (2004). Humanoid robots as cooperative partners for people. Int. Journal of Humanoid Robots, 1(2), 1–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brooks, D. J., Begum, M., and Yanco, H. A. (2016). “Analysis of reactions towards failures and recovery strategies for autonomous robots,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2016) (New York, NY: IEEE), 487–492.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chennells, M., Michael, J. (2018). Effort and performance in a cooperative activity are boosted by the perception of a partner’s effort, Nature: Scientific Reports (2018) 81:15692 | Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clodic, A., Cao, H., Alili, S., Montreuil, V., Alami, R., & Chatila, R. (2009). Shary: a supervision system adapted to human-robot interaction. In Experimental Robotics (pp. 229–238). Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clodic, A., Fleury, S., Alami, R., Chatila, R., Bailly, G., Brethes, L., …others (2006). Rackham: An interactive robot-guide. In ROMAN 2006-the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Hatfield (pp. 502–509). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1(1), 42–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cully, A., Clune, J., Tarapore, D., & Mouret, J. B. (2015). Robots that can adapt like animals. Nature, 521(7553), 503–507. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeSteno, D., Breazeal, C., Frank, R. H., Pizarro, D., Baumann, J., Dickens, L., & Lee, J. J. (2012). Detecting the trustworthiness of novel partners in economic exchange. Psychological science, 23(12), 1549–1556. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dragan, A. D., Lee, K. C., & Srinivasa, S. S. (2013, March). Legibility and predictability of robot motion. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on (pp. 301–308). IEEE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fasola, J., and Matarić, M. J. A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 2.2 (2013): 3–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G∗ Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feltz, D. L., Forlenza, S. T., Winn, B., & Kerr, N. L. (2014). Cyber buddy is better than no buddy: A test of the Köhler motivation effect in exergames. GAMES FOR HEALTH: Research, Development, and Clinical Applications, 3(2), 98–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrari, F., Eyssel, F. 2016. Toward a Hybrid Society. In: Springer Handbook of Robotics. Springer International Publishing, p. 909–918.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, K. (2011). How people talk with robots: Designing dialog to reduce user uncertainty. AI Magazine, 32(4), 31–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grigore, E. C., Eder, K., Pipe, A. G., Melhuish, C., & Leonards, U. (2013, November). Joint action understanding improves robot-to-human object handover. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on (pp. 4622–4629). IEEE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamacher, A., Bianchi-Berthouze, N., Pipe, A. G., & Eder, K. (2016, August). Believing in BERT: Using expressive communication to enhance trust and counteract operational error in physical Human-Robot Interaction. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 493–500). IEEE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahn Jr, P. H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., Gill, B. T., … & Shen, S. (2012). “Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental psychology, 48(2), 303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, M. K., Kiesler, S., Forlizzi, J. Receptionist or information 
kiosk: How do people talk with a robot? Presented at the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, New York, 2010.
Lee, J. J., Knox, B., Baumann, J., Breazeal, C., & DeSteno, D. (2013). Computationally modeling interpersonal trust. Frontiers in psychology, 41, 893. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenz, C., Nair, S., Rickert, M., Knoll, A., Rosel, W., Gast, J., … & Wallhoff, F. (2008, August). Joint-action for humans and industrial robots for assembly tasks. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2008. RO-MAN 2008. The 17th IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 130–135). IEEE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 1(4), 476–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michael, J., & Salice, A. (2017). The Sense of Commitment in Human–Robot Interaction. International journal of social robotics, 9(5), 755–763. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michael, J., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2015). The sense of commitment: A minimal approach. Frontiers in psychology, 61, 1968.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Observing joint action: Coordination creates commitment. Cognition, 1571, 106–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirnig, N., Stollnberger, G., Miksch, M., Stadler, S., Giuliani, M., & Tscheligi, M. (2017). To err is robot: How humans assess and act toward an erroneous social robot. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 4, 21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palinko, O., Sciutti, A., Wakita, Y., Matsumoto, Y., & Sandini, G. (2016, November). If looks could kill: Humanoid robots play a gaze-based social game with humans. In Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on (pp. 905–910). IEEE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy – Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, S. & Kümmert, F. Exercising with a humanoid companion are more effective than exercising alone, 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), Cancun, 2016, pp. 495–501. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sciutti, A., Bisio, A., Nori, F., Metta, G., Fadiga, L., & Sandini, G. (2012). Anticipatory gaze in human-robot interactions. In Gaze in HRI from modeling to communication” workshop at the 7th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Robots can be perceived as goal-oriented agents. Interaction Studies, 14(3), 329–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sciutti, A., Bisio, A., Nori, F., Metta, G., Fadiga, L., Pozzo, T., & Sandini, G. (2012). Measuring human-robot interaction through motor resonance. International Journal of Social Robotics, 4(3), 223–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sciutti, A., Schillingmann, L., Palinko, O., Nagai, Y., & Sandini, G. (2015, March). A gaze-contingent dictating robot to study turn-taking. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts (pp. 137–138). ACM.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own? Cognition, 881, B11–B21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stenzel, A., Chinellato, E., Bou, M. A. T., del Pobil, Á. P., Lappe, M., & Liepelt, R. (2012). When humanoid robots become human-like interaction partners: corepresentation of robotic actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1073.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stulp, F., Grizou, J., Busch, B., & Lopes, M. (2015, September). Facilitating intention prediction for humans by optimizing robot motions. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on (pp. 1249–1255). IEEE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Székely, M., & Michael, J. (2018). Investing in commitment: Persistence in a joint action is enhanced by the perception of a partner’s effort. Cognition, 1741, 37–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wainer, J., Feil-Seifer, D. J., Shell, D. A., & Mataric, M. J. (2006, September). The role of physical embodiment in human-robot interaction. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006. The 15th IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 117–122). IEEE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Jeon, Ye Eun & Hee Sun Park
2026. Building trust beyond algorithm: How effort, service speed, and novelty increase trust in robot services. Computers in Human Behavior 176 ► pp. 108871 ff. DOI logo
Jeon, Ye Eun & Hee Sun Park
2026. Effort and Multidimensional Ability in Robot Services: How Human-Like Movement Increases Perceived Product Quality. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Silacci, Alessandro, Maurizio Caon & Mauro Cherubini
2026. When Motivation Can Be More Than a Message: Designing Agents to Boost Physical Activity. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2025 [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 16109], ► pp. 332 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Yu-An, Zicheng Zhu & Yi-Chieh Lee
2025. Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mattei, Marco
2025. Joint Guidance: A Capacity to Jointly Guide. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 16:3 ► pp. 1027 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Jinwei, Zhihua Zhou, Jianrong Ren, Lei Liu & Alastair M. Morrison
2025. From failure to forgiveness: Robots’ proactive role in the tourism industry. Tourism Management 111 ► pp. 105246 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Heewon, Soona Park, Jaehee Gim & Sung in Kim
2024. Barista robots with human appeal: Unraveling the impact of anthropomorphism, human presence, and perceived financial constraints on consumer behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management 122 ► pp. 103849 ff. DOI logo
Székely, Marcell & John Michael
2024. Perceiving others’ cognitive effort through movement: Path length, speed, and time. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 77:4 ► pp. 767 ff. DOI logo
Li, Chen, Dimitris Chrysostomou & Hongji Yang
2023. A speech-enabled virtual assistant for efficient human–robot interaction in industrial environments. Journal of Systems and Software 205 ► pp. 111818 ff. DOI logo
Li, Chen, Dimitrios Chrysostomou & Hongji Yang
2022. 2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability, and Security Companion (QRS-C), ► pp. 673 ff. DOI logo
Oravec, Jo Ann
2022. Love, Sex, and Robots: Technological Shaping of Intimate Relationships. In Good Robot, Bad Robot [Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI, ], ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Vignolo, Alessia, Henry Powell, Francesco Rea, Alessandra Sciutti, Luke Mcellin & John Michael
2022. A Humanoid Robot’s Effortful Adaptation Boosts Partners’ Commitment to an Interactive Teaching Task. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Vignolo, Alessia, Alessandra Sciutti & John Michael
2020. Using Robot Adaptivity to Support Learning in Child-Robot Interaction. In Social Robotics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12483], ► pp. 428 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue