Cover not available

Article published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 18:2 (2017) ► pp.214–233

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Does prestige affect us physiologically?

A study in an interactional context

 | University of Lausanne | University of Neuchâtel |
 | Institute for Cognitive Sciences – Marc Jeannerod, CNRS, Lyon |
 | Institute for Cognitive Sciences – Marc Jeannerod (UMR 5304), CNRS-Université Lyon 1 |
 | Institute for Cognitive Sciences – Marc Jeannerod (UMR 5304), CNRS-Université Lyon 1 |
Published online: 8 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18.2.04cor
Past research dedicated to the impact of hierarchy on the autonomic nervous system has focused mainly on dominance. The current study extends this investigation by assessing the effect of social prestige, operationalized through occupational status, and examines whether people react differently when interacting with individuals of high or low occupational status. Participants’ heart rate and electrodermal activity were recorded while they interacted with a confederate who was introduced either as a neurosurgeon (high-status condition) or as a nurse aide (low-status condition). The results show that, contrary to the participants’ skin conductance level, their heart rate was modulated by the confederate’s status. In the high-status condition, participants’ heart rate increased when the “neurosurgeon” approached them, reaching a higher level than when interacting with the person in the low-status condition. We discuss our results in terms of the threats or opportunities that prestige may elicit.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Material and methods
    • 2.1Ethics statement
    • 2.2Participants
    • 2.3Experimenters’ confederates
    • 2.4Design and procedure
    • 2.5Physiological recordings
    • 2.6Data reduction
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Heart rate
    • 3.2Electrodermal activity
      • 3.2.1SCL
      • 3.2.2SSCRs
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (53)
References
Album, D., & Westin, S. (2008). Do diseases have a prestige hierarchy? A survey among physicians and medical students. Social science & medicine, 66(1), 182–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 574–601. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aureli, F., Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. (1999). Heart rate responses to social interactions in free-moving rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): a pilot study. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113(1), 59–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boehm, C. (1999). Hierarchy in the forest: Egalitarianism and the evolution of human altruism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyce, W. T. (2004). Social stratification, health, and violence in the very young. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1036(1), 47–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1(3), 276–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brosschot, J. F., & Thayer, J. F. (2003). Heart rate response is longer after negative emotions than after positive emotions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 50(3), 181–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, L. M., Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2006). Affective reactions to pictures of ingroup and outgroup members. Biological Psychology, 71(3), 303–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 41). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. G. (2007). Handbook of psychophysiology. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cloutier, J., Norman, G. J., Li, T., & Berntson, G. G. (2013). Person perception and autonomic nervous system response: The costs and benefits of possessing a high social status. Biological psychology, 92(2), 301–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowlishaw, G., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1991). Dominance rank and mating success in male primates. Animal Behaviour, 41(6), 1045–1056. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cummins, D. (2005). Dominance, status, and social hierarchies. The handbook of evolutionary psychology, 676–697.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalmaso, M., Galfano, G., Coricelli, C., & Castelli, L. (2014). Temporal Dynamics Underlying the Modulation of Social Status on Social Attention. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e93139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalmaso, M., Pavan, G., Castelli, L., & Galfano, G. (2012). Social status gates social attention in humans. Biology Letters, 8(3), 450–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deaner, R. O., Khera, A. V., & Platt, M. L. (2005). Monkeys pay per view: Adaptive valuation of social images by Rhesus Macaques. Current Biology, 15(6), 543–548. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Isen, A. M., & Lowrance, R. (1995). Group representations and intergroup bias: Positive affect, similarity, and group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(8), 856–865. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edelman, M. S., & Omark, D. R. (1973). Dominance hierarchies in young children. Social Science Information, 12(1), 103–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, L. (1995). Dominance and reproductive success among nonhuman animals: A cross-species comparison. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(4), 257–333. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elo, I. T. (2009). Social class differentials in health and mortality: Patterns and explanations in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 553–572. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fieder, M., Huber, S., Bookstein, F. L., Iber, K., Schäfer, K., Winckler, G., & Wallner, B. (2005). Status and reproduction in humans: New evidence for the validity of evolutionary explanations on basis of a university sample. Ethology, 111(10), 940–950. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foulsham, T., Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Henrich, J., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: Effects of social status and speaking. Cognition, 117(3), 319–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19(1), 97–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and human behavior, 22(3), 165–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopcroft, R. L. (2006). Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(2), 104–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Main, J. C., Little, A. C., Welling, L. L. M., Feinberg, D. R., & Tiddeman, B. P. (2010). Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1681), 617–624. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2003). Can evolutionary psychology explain reproductive behavior in the contemporary United States? The Sociological Quarterly, 44(2), 291–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kleinke, C. L., & Williams, G. (1994). Effects of interviewer status, touch, and gender on cardiovascular reactivity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(2), 247–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes, 97–135.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, J. M., Lynch, J. J., Machiran, N. M., Thomas, S. A., & Malinow, K. L. (1982). The effect of status on blood pressure during verbal communication. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 5(2), 165–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Löw, A., Lang, P. J., Smith, J. C., & Bradley, M. M. (2008). Both Predator and Prey: Emotional Arousal in Threat and Reward. Psychological Science, 19(9), 865–873. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majolo, B., Lehmann, J., de Bortoli Vizioli, A., & Schino, G. (2012). Fitness-related benefits of dominance in primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 147(4), 652–660. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., & Gailliot, M. T. (2008). Selective attention to signs of success: Social dominance and early stage interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 488–501. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mendelson, T., Thurston, R. C., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2008). Affective and cardiovascular effects of experimentally-induced social status. Health Psychology, 27(4), 482–489. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newton, T. L., & Bane, C. M. (2001). Cardiovascular correlates of behavioral dominance and hostility during dyadic interaction. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40(1), 33–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newton, T. L., Bane, C. M., Flores, A., & Greenfield, J. (1999). Dominance, gender, and cardiovascular reactivity during social interaction. Psychophysiology, 36(2), 245–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newton, T. L., Watters, C. A., Philhower, C. L., & Weigel, R. A. (2005). Cardiovascular reactivity during dyadic social interaction: The roles of gender and dominance. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 57(3), 219–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067–1101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ratcliff, N. J., Hugenberg, K., Shriver, E. R., & Bernstein, M. J. (2011). The allure of status: High-status targets are privileged in face processing and memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(8), 1003–1015. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sapolsky, R. M. (2004). Social status and health in humans and other animals. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33(1), 393–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science, 308(5722), 648–652. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shortell, S. M. (1974). Occupational prestige differences within the medical and allied health professions. Social Science & Medicine (1967), 8(1), 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stephan, E., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2011). The effects of time perspective and level of construal on social distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 397–402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strayer, F. F., Chapeskie, T. R., & Strayer, J. (1978). The perception of preschool social dominance. Aggressive behavior, 4(2), 183–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strayer, F. F., & Strayer, J. (1976). An ethological analysis of social agonism and dominance relations among preschool children. Child Development, 47(4), 980–989. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treiman, D. J. (2013). Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vrana, S. R., & Rollock, D. (1996). The social context of emotion: Effects of ethnicity and authority/peer status on the emotional reports of African American college students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 296–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1998). Physiological response to a minimal social encounter: Effects of gender, ethnicity, and social context. Psychophysiology, 35(4), 462–469. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2006). Income inequality and population health: A review and explanation of the evidence. Social Science & Medicine, 62(7), 1768–1784. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Worchel, S., Axsom, D., Ferris, F., Samaha, G., & Schweizer, S. (1978). Determinants of the effect of intergroup cooperation on intergroup attraction. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22(3), 429–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, R. A., Killebrew, K., & Pimpalapure, D. (2002). Cardiovascular incentive effects where a challenge is unfixed: Demonstrations involving social evaluation, evaluator status, and monetary reward. Psychophysiology, 39(2), 188–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Schotté, Manuel
2025. Éprouver la domination. Par-delà le travail émotionnel. Tracés 47 ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Cordonier, Laurent, Gérald Bronner & Nicolas Walzer
2020. Du capital de (micro)notoriété au capital économique : le cas du marché de la conférence. L'Année sociologique Vol. 70:2 ► pp. 497 ff. DOI logo
Rudnicki, Konrad, Carolyn Declerck, Charlotte De Backer & Mario Berth
2019. Physiological changes during first encounters and their role in determining the perceived interaction quality. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 20:2 ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Bibliographie. In La nature du social, ► pp. 327 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue