Cover not available

Article published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 18:1 (2017) ► pp.142–160

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

A sociobiological account of indirect speech

 | University of Genoa | Roma Tre University |
Published online: 10 August 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18.1.07mas
Indirect speech is a remarkable trait of human communication. The present paper tackles the sociobiological underpinnings of communicative indirectness discussing both socio-interactional and cognitive rationales behind its manifestation in discourse. From a social perspective, the use of indirect forms in interactions can be regarded as an adaptive response to the epistemic implications of transacted new information in small primary groups, representing – in Givón’s terms – our “bio-cultural” descent. The design features of indirect strategies today may therefore be explained in terms of a form-function mapping in which indirect communicative expressions allowed a “safer” transaction of contents and a more cooperative attitude of speakers in both face-to-face and public contexts of communication. The unchallengeability effects notably induced by underencoded meanings have now received extensive experimental backing, unveiling intriguing underlying cognitive mechanisms such as the well-known cognitive illusions or fallacies.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Societies of intimates
  • 3.Pragmatic foundations and cognitive prerequisites for indirect communication
  • 4.Reasons and linguistic manifestations of indirect communication
  • 5.Indirect communication in political speeches
  • 6.Indirect communication and cognitive fallacies
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
References (47)
References
Bambini, V., Gentili, C., Ricciardi, E., Bertinetto, P. M., & Pietrini, P. (2011). Decomposing metaphor processing at the cognitive and neural level through functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Research Bulletin, 861, 203–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1991). Precursors to a theory of mind. In A. Whiten (Ed.), Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development, and simulation of everyday mindreading (pp. 233–252). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchi, C. (2003). Pragmatica del linguaggio. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brocca N., Garassino D., & Masia, V. (2016). Politici nella rete o nella rete dei politici? L’implicito nella comunicazione politica italiana su Twitter. PhiN-Beiheft, 11(2016), 66–79.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burkhardt, P. (2006). Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 981, 159–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, R. (1990). Verbal irony as conversational implicature. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Muncie (Indiana), Ball State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooley, C. H. (1897). The process of social change. Political Science Quarterly, 121, 63–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1909). Social organization: a study of the larger mind. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coolidge, F. L., & Wynn, T. (2012). Cognitive prerequisites for the evolution of indirect speech. In K. R. Gibson, & M. Tallerman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language evolution. Oxford: Oxord University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferretti, F. (2010). Coevoluzionismo senza se e senza ma. Rivista di estetica, 44(2), 29–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frith, U. (2003). Autism: Explaining the enigma. 2nd Edition. UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1973). The time-axis phenomenon. Language, 49(4), 890–925. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1991). Some substantive issues concerning verb serialization: Grammatical vs. cognitive packaging. In C. Lefebvre (Ed.), Serial verbs: grammatical, comparative, and cognitive approaches (pp. 137–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002). Bio-Linguistics. The Santa-Barbara lectures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. (1982). Exaptation: A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiolgy, 8(1), 4–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, P. H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grottanelli Vinigi, L. (1966). Ethonologica . Luomo e la civilt. Vol. III1, Milano: Edizioni Labor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hagoort, P., & Levinson, S. C. (2014). Neuropragmatics. In M. S. Gazzaniga, & G. R. Mangun (Eds.), The cognitive neurosciences, 5th edition (pp. 667–674). Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamblin, C. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hertrich, I., Kirsten, M., Tiemann, S., Beck, S., Whle, A., Ackermann, H., & Rolke, B. (2015). Context-dependent impact of presuppositions on early magnetic brain responses during speech perception. Brain & Language, 1491, 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornby, P. A. (1973). Intonation and Syntactic Structure in the Development of Presupposition, paper presented at the Biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development . Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
. (1974). Surface structure and presupposition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 530–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jang, G., Yoon, S., Lee, S., Park, H., Kim, J., Ko, J. H., & Park, H. (2013). Everyday conversation requires cognitive inference: Neural bases of comprehending implicated meanings in conversations. Neuroimage, 811, 61–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1972 [1944]). Training in Christianity. And the edifying discourse that accompanied it. Princeton, translated by Walter Lowrie D. D.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky C., & Kiparsky P. (1971). Fact. In D. D. Steinberg, & L. A. Jakobovitz (Eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 345–369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science, 121, 463–470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1979). Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(3), 339–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, E. (2009). La struttura informativa. Forma e funzione negli enunciati linguistici. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, E., & Masia, V. (2014). Implicitness impact: measuring texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 611, 161–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oswald, S., Maillat, D., & Saussure, L. de (2016). Deceptive and uncooperative communication. In L. de Saussure, & A. Rocci (Eds.), Verbal communication (Handbooks of communicative science 3) (pp. 509–534). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Philips, S. (1976). Some sources of cultural variability in the regulation of talk. Language in Society, 5(1), 81–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2007). The evolutionary social psychology of off-record indirect speech acts. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(4), 437–461. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, S., Nowak, M. A., & Lee, J. J. (2008). The logic of indirect speech. PNAS, 105(3), 833–838. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, 515–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 211, 188–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saussure, L. de, & Oswald, S. (2009). Argumentation et engagement du locuteur: pour un point de vue subjectiviste. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique franaise, 291, 215–243.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saussure, L. de (2013). Background relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 591, 178–189. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Prsuppositions discursives, assertion darrire-plan et persuasion. In T. Herman, & S. Oswald (Eds.), Rhetoric and cognition. Theoretical perspectives and persuasive strategies.Bern: Peter Lang.
Sbis, M. (2007). Detto non detto. Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., Clment, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25(4), 359–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, D. (1996). The Straw Man Fallacy. In J. Benthem, F. van Emeren, R. van Grootendorst, & F. Veltman (Eds.), Logic and argumentation (pp. 115–128). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, L., & Schumacher, P. (2013). New is not always costly: evidence from online processing of topic and contrast in Japanese. Frontiers in Psychology. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Reboul, Anne
2021. Truthfully Misleading: Truth, Informativity, and Manipulation in Linguistic Communication. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. The Manipulative Disguise of Truth [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 322], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue