Cover not available

Article published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 18:1 (2017) ► pp.116–141

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

You can laugh at everything, but not with everyone

What jokes can tell us about group affiliations

 |  | Central European University |
 |  | Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition |  | Université Pierre Mendès France |
 |  | Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception |  | Université Paris Descartes |
 |  | Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod |  | Université de Lyon 1 |
 |  | Université de Lyon 1 |
Published online: 10 August 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18.1.06mor
This paper explores the impact of group affiliation with respect to the on-line processing and appreciation of jokes, using facial electromyography (EMG) activity and offline evaluations as dependent measures. Two experiments were conducted in which group affiliation varied between the participant and each of two independent (recorded confederate) speakers whose described political profiles were distinguished through one word: “Right” versus “Left.” Experiment 1 showed that jokes were more highly evaluated and that associated EMG activity was more intense when it was later determined that the speaker was a member of the listener’s ingroup rather than outgroup. In an effort to determine whether these parochial effects can be isolated to ingroup favoritism as opposed to outgroup derogation, Experiment 2 paired a joke-teller described as politically active (either from the right or the left) with one who was described as politically neutral. These more subtle comparisons suggest that the parochial effects observed in our joke understanding paradigm are mediated, at least in part, by the presence of an outgroup member.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Parochialism and language
    • 1.2The case of jokes: Laughter as a dependent variable
  • 2.Experiment 1
    • 2.1Method
      • 2.1.1Participants
      • 2.1.2Stimuli
      • 2.1.3Apparatus
      • 2.1.4Procedure
      • 2.1.5Data analysis
    • 2.2Results
      • 2.2.1EMG results
      • 2.2.2Post-joke evaluation results
    • 2.3Discussion
  • 3.Experiment 2
    • 3.1Method
      • 3.1.1Participants
      • 3.1.2Stimuli
      • 3.1.3Procedure
    • 3.2Results and discussion
  • 4.General discussion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Note
  • References
References (38)
References
Abrams, J. R., & Bippus, A. (2011). An intergroup investigation of disparaging humor. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30(2), 193–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, S. (1993). Violation of conversational maxims and cooperation: The case of jokes. Journal of Pragmatics, 19(6), 537–558. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D., & Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 390–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baron, J. (2012). Parochialism as a result of cognitive biases. In R. Goodman, D. Jinks, & A. K. Woods (Eds.), Understanding social action, promoting human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–9, [URL].
Beaupré, M. G., & Hess, U. (2003). In my mind, we all smile a case of ingroup favoritism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 391, 371–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarly in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 7–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 221, 1482–1493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, B. H., Davidson, R. J., Senulis, J. A., Saron, C. D., & Weisman, D. R. (1992). Muscle tension patterns during auditory attention. Biological Psychology, 331, 133–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curry, O. S., & Dunbar, R.I. M. (2013). Sharing a joke: The effects of a similar sense of humor on affiliation and altruism. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 125–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dezecache, G., & Dunbar, R.I. M. (2012). Sharing the joke: the size of natural laughter groups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(6), 775–779. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunbar, R.I. M. (2012). Bridging the bonding gap: the transition from primates to humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1597), 1837–1846. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunbar, R., Baron, R., Frangou, A., Peirce, E., Van Leeuwen, E.J. C., Stow, J., Partridge, G., MacDonald, I., Barra, V., & Van Vugt, M. (2012). Social laughter is correlated with an elevated pain threshold. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London/B, 2791, 1161–1167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flamson, T., & Barrett, H. C. (2008). The encryption theory of humor: A knowledge-based mechanism of honest signaling. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 61, 261–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gervais, M., & Wilson, D. S. (2005). The evolution and functions of laughter and humor: a synthetic approach. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 80(4), 395–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hess, U., Beaupré, M. G., & Cheung, N. (2002). Who to whom and why – cultural differences and similarities in the function of smiles. In Millicent Abel (Ed.), An empirical reflection on the smile (pp. 187–216). New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodson, G., Rush, J., & Macinnis, C. C. (2010). A joke is just a joke (except when it isn't): cavalier humor beliefs facilitate the expression of group dominance motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 660–682. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoicka, E., & Akhtar, N. (2012). Early humour production. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(4), 586–603. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hurley, M. M., Dennett, D. C., & Adams Jr., R. B. (2011). Inside Jokes: Using Humor to Reverse-Engineer the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynch, R. (2010). It's funny because we think it's true: laughter is augmented by implicit preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 311, 141–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maass, A. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotypes-perpetuation through language. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 311, 79–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maass, A., Salvi, D., Acuri, L., & Semin, G. R. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 571, 981–993. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M., Mermillod, M., Maringer, M., & Hess, U. (2010). The future of SIMS: Who embodies which smile and when? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(6), 464–480. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panskepp J. (2000). The riddle of laughter: neural and psychoevolutionary underpinnings of joy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 91, 183–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Platow, M. J., Haslam, S. A., Both, A., Chew, I., Cuddon, M., Goharpey, N., Maurer, J., Rosini, S., Tsekouras, A., & Grace, D. M.. (2005). « It's not funny if they're laughing »: self-categorization, social influence, and responses to canned laughter. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(5), 542–550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollio, H. R., & Bainum, C. K. (1983). Are funny groups good at solving problems? A methodological evaluation and some preliminary results. Small Group Behavior, 14(4), 379–404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Provine, R. R. (1992). Contagious laughter: Laughter is a suffcient stimulus for laughs and smiles. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 301, 1–4. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz-Sea, P., & Simmons, R. T. (1991). Egoism, parochialism, and universalism. Rationality and Society, 31, 106–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smoski, M. J., & Bachorowski, J.-A. (2003). Antiphonal laughter between friends and strangers. Cognition and Emotion, 171, 327–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, M., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic Vigilance. Mind and Language, 25(4), 359–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986/1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup European. Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Topolinski, S., Likowski, K. U., Weyers, P., & Strack, F. (2009). The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions. Cognition and Emotion, 23(2), 260–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weisfeld, G. E. (1993). The adaptive value of humor and laughter. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14(2), 141–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation increases positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 811, 989–1000. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolosin, R. J. (1975). Cognitive similarity and group laughter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(3), 503–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Kuperwasser, Inbal & Einat Shetreet
2025. Beyond stereotypes: Cognitive abilities underlying social meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 242 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Martucci, Alessia, Daniela Graziani, Eva Bei, Luca Bischetti, Valentina Bambini, Mustafa Can Gursesli, Andrea Guazzini & Chiara Pecini
2025. Emotional engagement in a humor-understanding reading task: an AI study perspective. Current Psychology 44:9 ► pp. 7818 ff. DOI logo
Mazzocconi, Chiara, Benjamin O’Brien, Kübra Bodur & Abdellah Fourtassi
2025. Do Children Laugh Like Their Parents? Conversational Laughter Mimicry Occurrence and Acoustic Alignment in Middle-Childhood. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 49:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Bischetti, Luca, Irene Ceccato, Serena Lecce, Elena Cavallini & Valentina Bambini
2023. Pragmatics and theory of mind in older adults’ humor comprehension. Current Psychology 42:19 ► pp. 16191 ff. DOI logo
van Berkum, Jos J. A., Marijn Struiksma & Björn ‘t Hart
2023. Using Facial EMG to Track Emotion During Language Comprehension: Past, Present, and Future. In Language Electrified [Neuromethods, 202], ► pp. 687 ff. DOI logo
Reed, Lawrence Ian & Evelyn Castro
2022. Are You Laughing at Them or with Them? Laughter as a Signal of In-Group Affiliation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 46:1 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Bischoff, Marie, Silke Schmidt & Holger Muehlan
2021. Development and validation of the child humor orientation scale short-form. HUMOR 34:1 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Bryant, Gregory A., Christine S. Wang & Riccardo Fusaroli
2020. Recognizing affiliation in colaughter and cospeech. Royal Society Open Science 7:10 ► pp. 201092 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue