Article published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 17:2 (2016) ► pp.279–305
Investigating the parent-child interactive behavior of autistic children by using composite light-emitting or reflective toys
Published online: 21 December 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.17.2.05lee
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.17.2.05lee
Abstract
A toy is a valuable medium for promoting parent-child interaction. This study selected six light-emitting or reflective materials to produce composite toy balls, and conducted tests on 15 families with preschool-aged high-functioning autistic children. Quantification method I analysis was employed in the study, and the experimental results indicated that (a) the metal ball (reflective and dynamic light) was the representative sample that elicited many smiles or laughs and much finger pointing as well as high levels of pleasure and activeness.; (b) the mitball (static light) was the representative sample that provoked much eye contact, produced satisfactory reactions to activities,; (c) the quality of fluorescence enhanced the levels of pleasure and the reactions to the activity. We propose that dynamic and reflective materials can be adopted to divert the attention of children, and fluorescent toys can then employed to sustain parent-child interaction.
Keywords: autism, parent-child interaction, toy, attention
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Two stages of the experiment
- 1.1.1Stage 1: Selecting and designing experimental samples
- 1.1.2Stage 2: Parent-child interactive experiments
- 1.1Two stages of the experiment
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Interactive behaviors of patients with Autism
- 2.2Methods of experiment
- 3.Experimental plan and design
- 3.1Experimental plan and records
- 3.1.1Items for timing
- 3.1.2Interactive behaviors
- 3.1.3Level of interaction
- 3.2Research questions and limitations
- 3.2.1Research problem statement
- 3.2.1.1Material features and interactive behavior
- 3.2.1.2Diversion
- 3.2.1.3Toy designs and applications
- 3.2.2Research scope limitation
- 3.2.2.1Age and diagnostic background of participants
- 3.2.2.2Locations, equipment, and researchers of the experiment
- 3.2.1Research problem statement
- 3.1Experimental plan and records
- 4.Experiments and analysis
- 4.1Stage 1: Selecting and designing experimental samples
- 4.1.1Type of light source
- 4.1.2Physical characteristics
- 4.1.3Composite state
- 4.2Stage 2: Parent-child interactive experiments
- 4.3Experimental analysis
- 4.3.1Recording the interactive behavior
- 4.3.2Relationship between smiles or laughs and the material features
- 4.3.2.1Number of smiles or laughs
- 4.3.3Relationship between eye contact and material features
- 4.3.3.1Amount of eye contact
- 4.3.4Relationship between finger pointing and material features
- 4.3.4.1Amount of finger pointing
- 4.3.5Time required for diversion and parent-child interaction time
- 4.3.5.1Evaluation of the level of interaction
- 4.1Stage 1: Selecting and designing experimental samples
- 5.Conclusion
- 5.1Material features and interactive behavior
- 5.2Diversion
- 5.3Toy designs and applications
- 6.Future studies
- Acknowledgements
- Note
References
References (19)
Ayres, A. J. (1969). Deficits in sensory integration in educationally handicapped children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2(1), 160–168.
Barakova, E., Gillessen, J., & Feijs, L. (2009). Social training of autistic children with interactive intelligent agents. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 8(1), 23–34.
Billard, A., Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., & Nadel, K. (2007). Building Robota, a mini-humanoid robot for the rehabilitation of children with autism. Assistive Technology, 19(1), 37–49.
Dautenhahn, K. (2000). Design issues on interactive environments for children with autism. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies (ICDVRAT 2000) (pp. 153–161). Alghero, Italy.
Department of Statistics, Ministry of the Interior, Republic of China. (2014). Monthly Bulletin of Interior Statistics, Week 24. Retrieved from [URL]
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., Fabes, R. A., Reiser, M., Cumberland, A., Shepard, S. A., . . . Thompson, M. (2004). The relations of effortful control and impulsivity to children’s resiliency and adjustment. Child Development, 75(1), 25–46.
Farr, W. J. (2011). Tangible User Interfaces and Social Interaction in Children with Autism (Doctoral thesis). University of Sussex.
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(1), 271–299.
Hamilton, L. M. (2000). Facing autism: Giving parents reasons for hope and guidance for help. Colorado Spring, CO: Waterbrook Press.
Hayashi, C. (1950). On the quantification of qualitative data from the mathematico-statistical point of view. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 2(1), 35–47.
Lo, J. L. (1998). Sensory integration and child development: Theory and applications. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological Publishing.
Ma, M. Y., & Lee, Y. H. (2014). Children with autism and composite Tactile – Visual sensory toys during parent-child interaction. Interaction Studies, 15(1), 260–291.
Michaud, F., & Caron, S. (2000). Roball-an autonomous toy-rolling robot. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Interactive Robotics and Entertainment. Pittsburgh, PA.
Parkinson, B., & Totterdell, P. (1999). Classifying affect-regulation strategies. Cognition and Emotion, 13(1), 277–303.
Prizant, B. M., Wetherby, A. M., Rubin, E., Laurent, A. C., & Rydell, P. J. (2006a). The SCERTS model: Volume I: Assessment. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
(2006b). The SCERTS model: Volume II: Program planning and intervention. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
Soong, W. T., & Chiang, C. H. (2001). The psychopathology of autistic disorder: A critical review. Taiwanese Journal of Psychiatry, 15(1), 169–183.