Article published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 19:3 (2018) ► pp.499–518
Team coordination in high-risk circus acrobatics
Published online: 13 March 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16035.fil
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16035.fil
Abstract
To advance understanding of the mechanisms allowing for team coordination (TC) in complex motor actions, we
conducted a qualitative study with eight elite hand-to-hand circus acrobats. Data collection consisted of field observations, an
open-ended interview with the participants’ head coach, and focus group interviews with all acrobats. Data analysis yielded three
higher order themes: TC, collective efficacy (CE), and TC-CE linkage. Teammates’ shared and complementary mental models, as well
as implicit and explicit communication dynamics, emerged as formative sub-themes of TC; self-efficacy and other’s-efficacy emerged as
reflective sub-themes of CE. Our findings also suggest that TC is likely inter-related to CE in a systemic fashion. Practitioners
should encourage the development of both shared and complementary models of thinking, while promoting verbal and non-verbal
communication skills. Finally, increasing teammates’ confidence in themselves and in their teammates can help in the development
of CE as well as the enhancement of TC.
Article outline
- Conceptual framework of coordination in teams
- The present study
- Method
- Participants
- Data collection
- Focus group interviews
- Coach interview
- Field observations
- Data analysis
- Inductive thematic analysis
- Direct content analysis
- Results
- Team coordination
- Shared mental models
- Complementary mental models
- Verbal communication
- Non-verbal communication
- Collective efficacy
- Self-efficacy
- Other’s-efficacy
- Team coordination and collective efficacy linkage
- Team coordination
- Discussion
- Underlying factors of team coordination
- The role of collective efficacy
- Team coordination and collective efficacy linkage
- Limitations
- Future research and applied implications
- Acknowledgements
References
References (63)
Arrow, H., Poole, M. S., Henry, K. B., Wheelan, S., & Moreland, R. (2004). Time, change, and development: The temporal perspective on groups. Small Group Research, 351, 73–105.
Atik, Y. (1994). The conductor and the orchestra: Interactive aspects of the leadership process. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 151, 22–28.
Bietti, L. M., & Sutton, J. (2015). Interacting to remember at multiple timescales: Coordination, collaboration, cooperation and culture in joint remembering. Interaction Studies, 161, 419–450.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 31, 77–101.
Bruun, D. M., Krustrup, P., Hornstrup, T., Uth, J., Brasso, K., Rørth, M., … & Midtgaard, J. (2014). “All boys and men can play football”: A qualitative investigation of recreational football in prostate cancer patients. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 241, 113–121.
Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. G. (2007). Psychophysiological science: Interdisciplinary approaches to classic questions about the mind. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Carron, A. V., Eys, M. A., & Burke, S. M. (2007). Team cohesion: nature, correlates, and development. In S. Jowette, & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 91e102). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Carron, A. V., & Spink, K. S. (1993). Team building in an exercise setting. The Sport Psychologist, 71, 8–18.
Collins, J., & Durand-Bush, N. (2015). Frameworks of team processes in sport: A critical review with implications for practitioners. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 31, 46–59.
Coyle, A. (2010). Qualitative research and anomalous experience: a call for interpretative pluralism. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 71, 79–83. .
DeLong, C., Pathak, N., Erickson, K., Perrino, E., Shim, K., & Srivastava, J. (2011). Team Skill: modeling team chemistry in online multi-player games. In J. Huang, L. Cao, & J. Srivastava (Eds.), Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 519–531). Berlin, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Dunbar, R. I. (2009). The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution. Annals of Human Biology, 361, 562–572.
Eccles, D. (2010). The coordination of labour in sports teams. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31, 154–170.
Eccles, D. W., & Tenenbaum, G. (2004). Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: A social-cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 261, 542–560.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 621, 107–115.
Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E., & Sullivan, P. J. (2008). Self-efficacy in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Filho, E. (2015). “Team chemistry” through chemistry lenses: Interdisciplinary science or a metaphorical conundrum? Frontiers in Psychology, 61.
Filho, E., Aubertin, P., & Petiot, B. (2016). The making of expert performers at Cirque du Soleil and the National Circus School: A performance enhancement outlook. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, 71, 68–79.
Filho, E., Bertollo, M., Robazza, C., & Comani, S. (2015b). The juggling paradigm: A novel social neuroscience approach to identify neuropsychophysiological markers of team mental models. Frontiers in Psychology, 61.
Filho, E., Gershgoren, L., Basevitch, I., Schinke, R., & Tenenbaum, G. (2014). Peer leadership and shared mental models in a college volleyball team: A season long case study. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 81, 184–203.
Filho, E., & Rettig, J. (2016). Intergroup conflict management strategies from a Nobel Peace Laureate: The case of Jose Ramos-Horta. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 381, 351–361.
Filho, E., & Tenenbaum, G. (2012). Team mental models in sports: An overview. In R. Schinke (Ed.), Athletic insight’s writings in sport psychology. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers. Inc.
Filho, E., Tenenbaum, G., & Yang, Y. (2015a). Cohesion, team mental models, and collective efficacy: Towards an integrated framework of team dynamics in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 331, 641–653.
Garud, R. (1997). On the distinction between know-how, know-what, and know-why. Advances in Strategic Management, 141, 81–102.
Gershgoren, L., Basevitch, I., Filho, E., Gershgoren, A., Brill, Y. S., Schinke, R. J., & Tenenbaum, G. (2016). Expertise in soccer teams: A thematic inquiry into the role of shared mental models within team chemistry. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 241, 128–139.
Gershgoren, L., Filho, E., Tenenbaum, G., & Schinke, R. J. (2013). Coaching shared mental models in soccer: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 71, 293–312.
Giske, R., Rodahl, S. E., & Høigaard, R. (2015). Shared mental task models in elite ice hockey and handball teams: Does it exist and how does the coach intervene to make an impact? Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 271, 20–34.
Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 301, 269–287.
Hiller, N. J., DeChurch, L. A., Murase, T., & Doty, D. (2011). Searching for outcomes of leadership: A 25-year review. Journal of Management, 371, 1137–1177.
Hoyle, R. H. (2011). Structural equation modeling for social and personality psychology. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 151, 1277–1288.
Kelso, J. A. S. (2012). Multistability and metastability: Understanding dynamic coordination in the brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 3671, 906–918.
Kincheloe, J. (2005). On to the next level: continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 111, 323–350.
Klein, G. (2000). Cognitive task analysis of teams. In J. M. Schraagen, S. F. Chipman, & V. L. Shalin (Eds.), Cognitive task analysis (pp. 417–430). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 201, 403–437.
Lefebvre, A. (2016). The coordination of moves in Aikido interaction. Gesture, 151, 123–155.
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 261, 356–376.
Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11, 320–339.
Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 851, 273–283.
(1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Ménard, J. F., & Hallé, M. (2014). Circus also needs performance psychology: Facts and realities of consulting at Cirque du Soleil. In J. G. Cremades & L. S. Tashman (Eds.), Becoming a sport, exercise, and performance psychology professional: A global perspective. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2006). Adopting a constructivist approach to grounded theory: Implications for research design. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 121, 8–13.
Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 361, 876–910.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Peterson, E., Mitchell, T. R., Thompson, L., & Burr, R. (2000). Collective efficacy and aspects of shared mental models as predictors of performance over time in work groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 31, 296–316.
Reimer, T., Park, E. S., & Hinsz, V. B. (2006). Shared and coordinated cognition in competitive and dynamic task environments: An information‐processing perspective for team sports. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 41, 376–400.
Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., Burke, C. S., Goodwin, G. F., & Fiore, S. (2006). The making of a dream team: When expert teams do best. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 439–453). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Short, S. E., Sullivan, P., & Feltz, D. L. (2005). Development and preliminary validation of the collective efficacy questionnaire for sports. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 91, 181–202.
Silva, P., Garganta, J., Araújo, D., Davids, K., & Aguiar, P. (2013). Shared knowledge or shared affordances? Insights from an ecological dynamics approach to team coordination in sports. Sports Medicine, 431, 765–772.
Simons, M., de Vet, E., Hoornstra, S., Brug, J., Seidell, J., & Chinapaw, M. (2012). Adolescents’ views on active and non-active videogames: a focus group study. Games for Health, 11, 211–218.
Sparkes, A. C., & Smith, B. (2014). Qualitative research methods in sport, exercise and health: From process to product. New York, NY: Routledge.
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. M. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Vilar, L., Araújo, D., Davids, K., & Button, C. (2012). The role of ecological dynamics in analysing performance in team sports. Sports Medicine, 421, 1–10.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Berman, Nina & Mary Akinyi Otieno
Gómez-Ruano, Miguel-Ángel, Sergio Jiménez Saiz, Edson Filho, Carlos Lago-Peñas & Yixiong Cui
Piasecki, Piotr A. & Edson Filho
Popp, Alisa, Magdalena Hartmann & Stephan Huber
Faltus, John & Veronique Richard
Stuckey, Melanie, Véronique Richard, Adam Decker, Patrice Aubertin & Dean Kriellaars
Filho, Edson & Gershon Tenenbaum
Hoyle, Ben, Jamie Taylor, Luca Zugic & Edson Filho
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
