Article published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 20:2 (2019) ► pp.307–338
How do technological properties influence user affordance of wearable technologies?
Published online: 7 October 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16024.shi
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16024.shi
Abstract
The Internet of things (IoT) affords people plenty of opportunities and a higher quality of life as well as drives
a huge amount of data. By drawing on the concept of affordances, this study examines the user experience of personal informatics
focusing on the technological and affective nature of affordance. A multi-mixed approach is used by combining qualitative methods
and a quantitative survey. Results of the qualitative methods revealed a series of factors that related to the affordance of
personal informatics, whereas results of the user model confirmed a significant role for connectivity, control, and synchronicity
affordance regarding their underlying link to other variables, namely, expectation, confirmation, and satisfaction. The
experiments showed that users’ affordances are greatly influenced by personal traits with interactivity tendency. The findings
imply the embodied cognition process of personal informatics in which technological qualities are shaped by users’ perception,
traits, and context. The results establish a foundation for wearable technologies through a heuristic quality assessment tool from
a user embodied cognitive process. They confirm the validity and utility of applying affordances to the design of IoT as a useful
concept, as well as prove that the optimum mix of affordances is crucial to the success or failure of IoT design.
Article outline
- Literature review
- Affordances in IoT
- ECT and affordance
- PI as IoT technology
- Methods
- Mixed methods
- Qualitative method
- Instrument validity and reliability
- Survey
- Design: Survey development
- Survey measurement
- Hypotheses
- Satisfaction and confirmation
- Technological affordances and expectation
- Content quality (information quality)
- System quality
- Service quality
- Expectation-confirmation of affective affordances
- Fit indices
- Results from the User model
- Discussions regarding the survey
- Experiment
- Experiment design
- Experiment measurement
- Results from the experiment
- Main effects by feedback type
- Interaction effects
- Moderating effects by interactivity tendency
- Discussion regarding the experiment
- Results
- Summary of findings
- Discussion from the triangulation of data
- Summary of findings
- Implications: Affordance is in the eye of the Beholder
- Limitations
References
References (39)
Bernardo, M., Marimon, F., & Alonso-Almeida, M. (2012). Functional quality and hedonic quality: A study of the dimensions of e-service quality in online travel agencies. Information & Management, 491, 342–347.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.
Choe, E. K., Lee, N. B., Lee, B., Pratt, W., & Kientz, J. A. (2014, April). Understanding quantified-selfers’ practices in collecting and exploring personal data. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1143–1152). ACM.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2004). Measuring e-commerce success. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(1), 31–47.
DiClemente, C. C., Marinilli, A. S., Singh, M., & Bellino, L. E. (2001). The role of feedback in the process of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Behavior, 25(3), 217–227.
Evans, S., Pearce, K., & Vitak, J. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1) 35–52.
Ghasemaghaei, M., & Hassanein, K. (2016). A macro model of online information quality perceptions: A review and synthesis of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 551, 972–991.
Gimpel, H., & Niben, M. (2013). Quantifying the quantified self: A study on the motivation of patients to track their own health. Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems, Milan, Italy, Dec. 2013.
Haddadi, H., Mortier, R., McAuley, D., & Crowcroft, J. (2013). Human-data interaction. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Hou, J., Nam, Y., Peng, W., & Lee, K. (2012). Effects of screen size, viewing angle, and players’ immersion tendencies on game experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 281, 617–623.
Huang, T. & Liao, S. (2015). A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: the moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 269–295.
Hsu, P., Yen, H., & Chung, J. (2016). Assessing ERP post-implementation success at the individual level. Information & Management, 52(8), 925–942.
Karanam, Y., Filko, L., Kaser, L., Alotaibi, H., Makhsoom, E., & Voida, S. (2014). Motivational affordances and personality types in personal informatics. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, p. 79–82. >
Khorakhun, C., & Bhatti, S. (2015, October). mHealth through quantified-self: a user study. HealthCom 2015. 17th IEEE International Conference on eHealth Networking, Applications, and Services. Boston, MA, USA, October 2015.
Kim, J. (2016). Interacting socially with the Internet of Things (IoT): Effects of source attribution and specialization in human–IoT interaction. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 211, 420–435.
Komiak, S. (2010). The effects of perceived information quality and perceived system quality on trust and adoption of online reputation systems. AMCIS 2010 Proceedings. Paper 343. [URL]
Lee, K., Lee, S., & Hwang, Y. (2014). The impact of hyperlink affordance, psychological reactance, and perceived business tie on trust transfer. Computers in Human Behavior, 301, 110–120.
Li, I., Medynskjy, Y., Froehlich, J., & Larsen, J. (2012). Personal informatics in practice: Improving quality of life through data. In CHI 2012, May 5–10, 2012, Austin, TX, USA.
Mondi, M., Woods, P. & A. Rafi. (2008). A uses and gratification expectancy model to predict students’ perceived e-learning experience. Educational Technology & Society, 11 (2), 241–261.
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469.
Park, E., & Sundar, S. (2015). Can synchronicity and visual modality enhance social presence in mobile messaging? Computers in Human Behavior, 451,121–128.
Petkov, P., Köbler, F., Foth, M., & Krcmar, H. (2011, June). Motivating domestic energy conservation through comparative, community-based feedback in mobile and social media. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (pp. 21–30). ACM.
Roca, J. C., Chiu, C., & Martinez, F. J. (2006). Understanding E-learning continuance intention. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683–696.
See-To, E., & Ho, K. (2016). A study on the impact of design attributes on E-payment service utility. Information & Management, 53(5), 668–681.
Shin, D. (2009). Determinants of customer acceptance of multi-service network: An implication for IP-based technologies. Information and Management, 46(1), 16–22.
(2014). Measuring the quality of smartphones: Development of a customer satisfaction index for smart devices. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 12(4), 311–327.
Shin, D., Lee, S., & Hwang, Y. (2017). How do credibility and utility affect the user experience of health informatics services? Computers in Human Behavior, 671, 292–302.
Shin, D., & Biocca, F. (2017). Health experience model of personal informatics: The case of a quantified self. Computers in Human Behavior, 691, 62–74.
Shin, D. (2016). Cross-platform users’ experiences toward designing interusable systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(7), 503–514.
Shin, D., Choi, M., Kim, J., & Lee, J. (2016). Interaction, engagement, and perceived interactivity in single-handed interaction. Internet Research, 26(5), 1134–1157.
Shin, D. (2015). Quality of experience: Beyond the user experience of smart services. Total Quality Management, 26 (8), 919–932.
(2011). Understanding e-book users: Uses and gratification expectancy model. New Media and Society, 13(2), 260–278.
Spreng, R. A., & Chiou, S. (2002). A cross-cultural assessment of the satisfaction formation process. European Journal of Marketing, 36(8), 829–840.
Thatcher, J., & P. L. Perrewe. (2002). An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 381–96.
Vishwanath, A. (2016). Mobile device affordance: explicating how smartphones influence the outcome of phishing attacks. Computers in Human Behavior, 631, 198–207.
Vugt, H., Hoorn, J., Konjin, E., & Dimitriadou, A. (2006). Affective affordances: Improving interface character engagement through interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(9), 874–888.
Cited by (15)
Cited by 15 other publications
Castillo, Daniela, Ana Isabel Canhoto & Emanuel Said
Zhang, Yuanyuan & Bochun Kang
Sharma, Manu, Sudhanshu Joshi, Sunil Luthra & Anil Kumar
Wong, Arkers Kwan Ching, Jonathan Bayuo, Jing Jing Su, Frances Kam Yuet Wong, Karen Kit Sum Chow, Bonnie Po Wong, Siu Man Wong & Vivian Hui
Yin, Jibin, Miaomiao Wu, Shujie Bai, Hua Liu & Shoulin Wei
Chotiyaputta, Veerisa & Donghee Shin
Huang, Jinghua, Lujin Mao, Mengyao Qi, Dongliang Zhang, Ming An, Runze Han & Tiancheng Ji
Wang, Hongyang, Xiaotong Luo & Xiaodan Yu
Deranek, Kimberly, Barbara Hewitt, Arvind Gudi & Alexander McLeod
Li, Hongru, Guiling Sun, Yue Li & Runzhuo Yang
Li, Hongyu & Chien-Hsiung Chen
Song, Shijie, Yuxiang Chris Zhao, Xinlin Yao, Zhichao Ba & Qinghua Zhu
Zhang, Huaxia
Zhou, Alvin
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
