Cover not available

Article published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 16:1 (2015) ► pp.54–67

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

When triangles become human

Action co-representation for objects

 | Ludwig-Maximilian University München | Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen |
 | Technische Universität München |
 | Max Planck Institute for Human Development |
 | Ghent University |
 | Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen |
 | Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen |
Published online: 17 August 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.1.03mul
Until recently, it was assumed that co-representation of others’ actions, an essential part in joint action, is biologically tuned. However, research demonstrated that we also simulate actions of non-biological interaction partners under certain conditions. In the present study, we investigated whether perceived intentionality or perspective taking is the underlying mechanisms of this phenomenon. Participants saw a short video fragment of a non-biological agent (i.e. a triangle) as main character. The movements of this agent were either described as intentional or as unintentional. Furthermore, participants were instructed to either take the perspective of this non-biological agent or not. Results show that perspective taking and perceived intentionality both lead to action co-representation of non-biological actions. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants and design
    • 2.2Materials and procedure
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Manipulation check
    • 3.2Social Simon effect
  • 4.General discussion
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (51)
References
Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2007). Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time. Media Psychology, 101, 113–134.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aron, A., Aron, E.N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 601, 241–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brass, M., Bekkering, H. & Prinz, W. (2001). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica, 1061, 3–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Böckler, A., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2012). Effects of a coactor’s focus of attention on task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 381, 1404–1415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Böckler, A., & Zwickel, J. (2013). Influences of spontaneous perspective taking on spatial and identity processing of faces. Social, Cognitive, and Affective Neuroscience, 81, 735–740. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgoon, J.K., Bonito, J.A., Bengtsson, B., Cederberg, C., Lundeberg, M., & Allspach, L. (2000). Interactivity in human-computer interaction: A study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 161, 553–574. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Castelli, F., Happé, F., Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2000). Movement and mind: A functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage, 121, 314–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colzato, L.S., de Bruijn, E., & Hommel, B. (2012a). Up to “me” or up to “us”? The impact of self-construal priming on cognitive self-other integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colzato, L.S., Zech, H., Hommel, B., Verdonschot, R., van den Wildenberg, W., & Hsieh, S. (2012b). Lovingkindness brings lovingkindness: The impact of Buddhism on cognitive self-other integration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 191, 541–545. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cross, E.S., Liepelt, R., de C Hamilton, A.F., Parkinson, J., Ramsey, R., Stadler, W., & Prinz, W. (2012). Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network. Human Brain Mapping, 91, 2238–2254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J.A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 331, 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dittrich, K., Rothe, A., & Klauer, K.C. (2012). Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: A response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 741, 911–929. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Colzato, L.S., Schütz-Bosback, S., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2011). How “social“ is the social Simon effect? Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2013). The (not so) Social Simon effect: A referential coding account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 391, 1248–1260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dolk, T., Liepelt, R., Prinz, W., & Fiehler, K. (2013). Visual experience determines the use of external reference frames in joint action control. PLoS One, 81, e59008. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fukuda, H., & Ueda, K. (2010). Interaction with a moving object affects one’s perception of its animacy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 21, 187–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J.T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 1141, 864–886. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gazzola, V., Rizzolatti, G., Wicker, B., & Keysers, C. (2007). The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions. NeuroImage, 351, 1674–1684. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, M.C., & Brock, T.C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 291, 701–721. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, M.C., Brock, T.C., & Kaufman, G.F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 141, 311–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guagnano, D., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C.A. (2010). Sharing a task or sharing a space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task. Cognition, 1141, 348–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hard, B.M., Tversky, B., & Lang, D.S. (2006). Making sense of abstract events: Building event schemas. Memory & Cognition, 141, 1221–1253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hommel, B., Colzato, L.S., & van den Wildenberg, W.P.M. (2009). How social are task representations? Psychological Science, 71, 794–798. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilner, J.M., Paulignan, Y., & Blakemore, S.J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 131, 522–525. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liepelt, R., & Brass, M. (2010). Top-down modulation of motor priming by belief about animacy. Experimental Psychology, 571, 221–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liepelt, R., Schneider, J.C., Aichert, D., Wöstmann, N., Dehning, S., Möller, H.J., Riedel, M., Dolk, T., & Ettinger, U. (2012). Action blind: Disturbed self-other integration in Schizophrenia. Neuropsychologia, 501, 3775–3780. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liepelt, R., Wenke, D., & Fischer, R. (2013). Effects of feature integration in a hands-crossed version of the social simon paradigm. Psychological Research, 771, 240–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, B.C.N., Brass, M., Kühn, S., Tsai, C.-C., Nieuwboer, W., Dijksterhuis, A., & van Baaren, R.B. (2011a). When Pinocchio acts like a human, a wooden hand becomes embodied. Action co-representation for non-biological agents. Neuropsychologia, 491, 1373–1377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, B.C.N., Kühn, S., van Baaren, R.B., Dotsch, R., Brass, M., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2011b). Perspective taking eliminates differences in co-representation of out-group members’ actions. Experimental Brain Research, 2111, 423–428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, B.C.N., van Baaren, R.B., van Someren, D.H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2014). A present for Pinocchio: On when non-biological agents become real. Social Cognition, 321, 382–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Press, C. (2011). Action observation and robotic agents: Learning and anthropomorphism. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 351, 1410–1418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 91, 129–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramnani, N., & Miall, R.C. (2004). A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others. Nature Neuroscience, 71, 85–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramsey, R., & Hamilton de, C.A.F. (2010). Triangles have goals too: Understanding action representation in lef aIPS. Neuropsychologia, 481, 2773–2776. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samson, D., Apperly, I.A., Braithwaite, J.J., Andrews, B.J., & Bodley Scott, S.E. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 361, 1255–1266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, E.F., Lang, A., Shin, M., & Bradley, S.D. (2004). Death with a story: How story impacts emotional, motivational, and physiological responses to first-person shooter video games. Human Communication Research, 301, 361–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schultz, J., Friston, K.J., O‘Doherty, J., Wolpert, D.M., & Frith, C.D. (2005). Activation in posterior superior temporal sulcus parallels parameter inducing the percept of animacy. Neuron, 451, 625–635. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 101, 70–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own? Cognition, 81, 11–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stezel, A., Chinellato, E., del Pobil, Á.P., Lappe, M., & Liepelt, R. (2013). How deeply do we include robotic agents in the self? International Journal of Humanoid robotics, 101, 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stenzel, A., Chinellato, E., Tirado Bou, M.A., del Pobil, Á.P., Lappe, M., & Liepelt, R. (2012) When humanoid robots become human-like interaction partners: Co-representation of robotic actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 381, 1073–1077. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stosic, M., Brass, M., van Hoeck, N., Ma, N., & van Overwalle, F. (2014). Understanding simple goal-directed actions of shapes: The role of agency in mirror system activation. NeuroImage, 861, 264–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tai, Y.F., Scherfler, C., Brooks, D.J., Sawamoto, N., & Castiello, U. (2004). The human premotor cortex is ‘mirror’ only for biological actions. Current Biology, 141, 117–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teufel, C., Fletcher, P.C., & Davis, G. (2010). Seeing other minds: Attributed mental states influence perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 141, 376–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, C.-C., & Brass, M. (2007). Does the human motor system simulates Pinocchio’s actions? Coaction with a human hand versus a wooden hand in a dyadic interaction. Psychological Science, 181, 1058–1062. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, C.-C., Kuo, W.-J., Hung, D.L., & Tzeng, O.J.L. (2008). Action co-representation is tuned to other humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 201, 2015–2024. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, C.-C., Kuo, W.-J., Jing, J.-T., Hung, D.L., & Tzeng, O.J.L. (2006). A common coding framework in self-other interaction: Evidence from joint action task. Experimental Brain Research, 1751, 353–362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tversky, B., & Hard, B.M. (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking. Cognition, 1101, 124–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wheatley, T., Milleville, S.C., & Martin, A. (2007). Understanding animate agents: Distinct roles for the social network and mirror system. Psychological Science, 181, 469–474. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case of motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 1311, 460–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwickel, J. (2009). Agency attribution and visuo-spatial perspective taking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 161, 1089–1093. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Hu, Xucong, Haokui Xu, Hui Chen, Mowei Shen & Jifan Zhou
2025. Good to see you R2-D2: Inducing spontaneous perspective-taking towards non-human agents through human-like gaze and reach. Cognition 259 ► pp. 106101 ff. DOI logo
Ju, Naan, Terry Kim & Hyunjoo Im
2024. Fake human but real influencer: the interplay of authenticity and humanlikeness in Virtual Influencer communication?. Fashion and Textiles 11:1 DOI logo
Nijssen, Sari R.R., Morris Krainz, Mathew P. White & Sabine Pahl
2024. It's what on the inside that counts: Addressing the biodiversity crisis by emphasizing species' inner mental lives. Journal of Environmental Psychology 98 ► pp. 102411 ff. DOI logo
van der Weiden, Anouk, Emanuele Porcu & Roman Liepelt
2023. Action prediction modulates self–other integration in joint action. Psychological Research 87:2 ► pp. 537 ff. DOI logo
Mcgeough, Julienne, Thomas Gallagher-Mitchell, Dan Philip Andrew Clark & Neil Harrison
2021. Reliability and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of a Paper- Versus App-Administered Resilience Scale in Scottish Youths: Comparative Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 9:12 ► pp. e11055 ff. DOI logo
Müller, Barbara C. N., Xin Gao, Sari R. R. Nijssen & Tom G. E. Damen
2021. I, Robot: How Human Appearance and Mind Attribution Relate to the Perceived Danger of Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 13:4 ► pp. 691 ff. DOI logo
Nijssen, Sari R.R., Carolina Pletti, Markus Paulus & Barbara C.N. Müller
2021. Does agency matter? Neural processing of robotic movements in 4- and 8-year olds. Neuropsychologia 157 ► pp. 107853 ff. DOI logo
Sangati, Ekaterina, Marc Slors, Barbara C. N. Müller, Iris van Rooij & Sam Gilbert
2021. Joint Simon effect in movement trajectories. PLOS ONE 16:12 ► pp. e0261735 ff. DOI logo
Müller, Barbara C. N., Shengnan Chen, Sari R. R. Nijssen, Simone Kühn & Thomas A Stoffregen
2018. How (not) to increase older adults’ tendency to anthropomorphise in serious games. PLOS ONE 13:7 ► pp. e0199948 ff. DOI logo
van der Weiden, Anouk, Henk Aarts, Merel Prikken & Neeltje E. M. van Haren
2016. Individual differences in action co-representation: not personal distress or subclinical psychotic experiences but sex composition modulates joint action performance. Experimental Brain Research 234:2 ► pp. 499 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue