Article published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 16:1 (2015) ► pp.29–53
Exploring the effect of a user’s personality traits on tactile communication with a robot using Bayesian networks
Jungsik Hwang | Department of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology Republic of Korea | jungsik.hwang@gmail.com
Kun Chang Lee | SKKU Business School, Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea | kunchanglee@gmail.com
Published online: 17 August 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.1.02hwa
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.1.02hwa
Because robots are physically embodied agents, touch is one of the important modalities through which robots communicate with humans. Among the several factors that affect human-robot interaction, this research focuses on the effect of a user’s personality traits on tactile interactions with a robot. Participants interacted freely with a robot and their tactile interaction patterns were analyzed. Several classifiers were used to examine the effect of a participant’s degree of extroversion on tactile communication patterns with the robot and our results showed that a user’s personality traits affected the way in which they interacted with the robot. Specifically, important features of Bayesian networks, such as the Markov blanket and what-if/goal-seeking power were tested and showed the effect of personality on tactile interaction with respect to where and how participants touched the robot. We also found that, by using Bayesian network classifiers, a user’s personality traits can be inferred based on tactile communication patterns.
Article outline
- 1.Related work
- 1.1The effect of personality on social interactions with a robot
- 1.2Tactile communication with a robot
- 1.3General Bayesian network and Markov Blanket
- 2.Method
- 2.1Robot
- 2.2Participants
- 2.3Measurements
- 2.4Procedure
- 2.5Analysis tools
- 2.6Dataset
- 2.7Nodes in classifiers
- 3.Results
- 3.1Study 1: Comparison of classification performance
- 3.2Study 2: Causal relationship between personality and touch
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgement
References
References (53)
Aliferis, C.F., Tsamardinos, I., & Statnikov, A. (2003). HITON: A novel Markov Blanket algorithm for optimal variable selection.
AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings
, 21–25.
Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 256–274.
Argall, B.D., & Billard, A.G. (2010). A survey of tactile human–robot interactions. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 58(10), 1159–1176.
Bainbridge, W., Nozawa, S., Ueda, R., Okada, K., & Inaba, M. (2011). Robot sensor data as a means to measure human reactions to an interaction. Paper presented at
11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)
.
Batrinca, L., Lepri, B., & Pianesi, F. (2011). Multimodal recognition of personality during short self-presentations. Paper presented at the
Proceedings of the joint ACM workshop on Human gesture and behavior understanding
, Arizona, USA.
Clay, V.S. (1968). The effect of culture on mother-child tactile communication. The Family Coordinator, 17(3), 204–210.
Cristianini, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2000). An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deethardt, J.F., & Hines, D.G. (1983). Tactile communication and personality differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8(2), 143–156.
Gockley, R., Bruce, A., Forlizzi, J., Michalowski, M., Mundell, A., Rosenthal, S., Sellner, B., Simmons, R., Snipes, K., Schultz, A.C., & Jue, W. (2005). Designing robots for long-term social interaction. Paper presented at the
IEEE/RSJ International Conference on the Intelligent Robots and Systems
.
Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., & Swann Jr, W.B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I.H. (2009). The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 11(1), 10–18.
Hertenstein, M.J. (2002). Touch: Its communicative functions in infancy. Human Development, 45(2), 70–94.
Hertenstein, M.J., Keltner, D., App, B., Bulleit, B.A., & Jaskolka, A.R. (2006). Touch communicates distinct emotions. Emotion, 6(3), 528–533.
Hertenstein, M.J., Verkamp, J.M., Kerestes, A.M., & Holmes, R.M. (2006). The communicative functions of touch in humans, nonhuman primates, and rats: A review and synthesis of the empirical research. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(1), 5–94.
Isbister, K., & Nass, C. (2000). Consistency of personality in interactive characters: verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(2), 251–267.
Jin, R., & Agrawal, G. (2003). Efficient decision tree construction on streaming data. Paper presented at the
Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
, Washington, D.C.
John, O.P., Robins, R.W., & Pervin, L.A. (2010). Handbook of personality: Theory and research: Guilford Press.
John, O.P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 102–138): Guilford Press.
Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Ono, T., Imai, M., & Nakatsu, R. (2002). Development and evaluation of an interactive humanoid robot “Robovie”. Paper presented at the
Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
.
Koo, S.-Y., Lim, J.-G., & Kwon, D.-S. (2008). Online touch behavior recognition of hard-cover robot using temporal decision tree classifier. Paper presented at the
17th IEEE International Symposium on the Robot and Human Interactive Communication
.
Lee, K.C., & Cho, H. (2010). Performance of ensemble classifier for location prediction task: Emphasis on Markov Blanket perspective. International Journal of U- & E-Service, Science & Technology, 3(3), 1–12.
Lee, K.M., Peng, W., Jin, S.-A., & Yan, C. (2006). Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human–robot interaction. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 754–772.
Liao, K., Paulsen, M., Reid, J., Ni, B., & Bonifacio-Maghirang, E. (1993). Corn kernel breakage classification by machine vision using a neural network classifier. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers.
Lippa, R., & Dietz, J. (2000). The relation of gender, personality, and intelligence to judges’ accuracy in judging strangers’ personality from brief video segments. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24(1), 25–43.
Malphurs, J.E., Raag, T., Field, T., Pickens, J., & Pelaez-Nogueras, M. (1996). Touch by intrusive and withdrawn mothers with depressive symptoms. Early Development and Parenting, 5(2), 111–115.
Mastrogiovanni, F., Sgorbissa, A., & Zaccaria, R. (2010). A cognitive model for recognizing human behaviours in smart homes. annals of telecommunications – annales des télécommunications, 65(9–10), 523–538.
Melson, G.F., Peter, H., Kahn, J., Beck, A.M., Friedman, B., Roberts, T., & Garrett, E. (2005). Robots as dogs?: children’s interactions with the robotic dog AIBO and a live australian shepherd. Paper presented at the
CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
, Portland, OR, USA.
Mohammadi, G., Vinciarelli, A., & Mortillaro, M. (2010). The voice of personality: Mapping nonverbal vocal behavior into trait attributions. Paper presented at the
Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Social signal processing
, Firenze, Italy.
Morris, L.W. (1979). Extraversion and introversion: An interactional perspective. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
Murray, J.B. (1990). Review of research on the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70(3c), 1187–1202.
Nakagawa, K., Shiomi, M., Shinozawa, K., Matsumura, R., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2011). Effect of robot’s active touch on people’s motivation. Paper presented at the
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction
, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nass, C., & Lee, K.M. (2000). Does computer-generated speech manifest personality? An experimental test of similarity-attraction. Paper presented at the
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Pianesi, F., Mana, N., Cappelletti, A., Lepri, B., & Zancanaro, M. (2008). Multimodal recognition of personality traits in social interactions. Paper presented at the
Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Multimodal interfaces
, Chania, Crete, Greece.
Riggio, R.E., & Friedman, H.S. (1986). Impression formation: The role of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 421–427.
Salter, T., Boekhorst, R.T., & Dautenhahn, K. (2004). Detecting and analysing children’s play styles with autonomous mobile robots: A case study comparing observational data with sensor readings. Paper presented at the
Proc. The 8th Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems
.
Salter, T., Dautenhahn, K., & Boekhorst, R. t. (2006). Learning about natural human–robot interaction styles. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 54(2), 127–134.
Salter, T., Michaud, F., Letourneau, D., Lee, D.C., & Werry, I.P. (2007). Using proprioceptive sensors for categorizing human-robot interactions. Paper presented at the
2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
.
Scalmato, A., Sgorbissa, A., & Zaccaria, R. (2012). Describing and classifying spatial and temporal contexts with OWL DL in Ubiquitous Robotics. Paper presented at the
2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
.
Syrdal, D.S., Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Walters, M.L., & Koay, K.L. (2006). ‘Doing the right thing wrong’ – Personality and tolerance to uncomfortable robot approaches. Paper presented at the
15th IEEE International Symposium on the Robot and Human Interactive Communication
.
Takayama, L., & Pantofaru, C. (2009). Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction. Paper presented at the
IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
.
Tanaka, F., Cicourel, A., & Movellan, J.R. (2007). Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(46), 17954–17958.
Tapus, A., & Matarić, M.J. (2008). User Personality Matching with a Hands-Off Robot for Post-stroke Rehabilitation Therapy. In O. Khatib, V. Kumar, & D. Rus (Eds.), Experimental Robotics (Vol. 391, pp. 165–175). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Tapus, A., Ţăpuş, C., & Matarić, M.J. (2008). User – robot personality matching and assistive robot behavior adaptation for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy. Intelligent Service Robotics, 1(2), 169–183.
Trapnell, P.D., & Wiggins, J.S. (1990). Extension of the interpersonal adjective scales to include the big five dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 781–790.
Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., & Tanie, K. (2004). Effects of robot-assisted activity for elderly people and nurses at a day service center.
Proceedings of the IEEE
, 92(11), 1780–1788.
Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K., te Boekhorst, R., Koay, K.L., Kaouri, C., Woods, S., Nehaniv, C., Lee, D., & Werry, I. (2005). The influence of subjects’ personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment. Paper presented at the
IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication
.
Wiggins, J.S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 395–412.
