Article published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 15:2 (2014) ► pp.180–183
Improving the modeling of dog-owner interactions for the design of social robots
Published online: 20 August 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.15.2.03nic
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.15.2.03nic
References (7)
Fong, T., Nourbaksh, I., & Daugtenhahn, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 421, 143–166.
Huang, C.M., & Thomaz, A.L. (2011). Effects of responding to, initiating and ensuring joint attention in human-robot interaction.
IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communications (RO-MAN)
, 65–71.
Takayama, L., Pantofaru, C. (2009). Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction.
IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
, 5495–5502.
Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K., Boekhorst, R., Koay, K.L., Syrdal, D.S., & Nehaniv, C.L. (2009). An empirical framework for human-robot proxemics.
Proceedings of New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction: Symposium at the AISB09 convention
, 144–149.
Feil-Seifer, D., & Matarić, M.J. (2010). Using proxemics to evaluate human-robot interaction.
Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
, 143–144.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Faragó, Tamás, Márta Gácsi, Beáta Korcsok & Ádám Miklósi
2014. Why is a dog-behaviour-inspired social robot not a doggy-robot?. Interaction Studies 15:2 ► pp. 224 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
