Article published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 15:2 (2014) ► pp.173–179
Building better robots
Lessons from observing relationships between living beings
Published online: 20 August 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.15.2.02mel
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.15.2.02mel
References (10)
Ainsworth, M.D.S., & Bell, S.M. (1970). Attachment,exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 411, 49–67.
Burleigh, T.J., Schoenherr, J.R., & Lacroix, G.L. (2013). Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces. Computers in Human Behavior, 291, 759–771.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Gray, K., & Wegner, D.M. (2012). Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition, 1251, 125–130.
Melson, G.F. (2013). Building a technoself: Children’s ideas about and behavior toward robotic pets. In R. Luppicini (Ed.), Handbook of research on the technoself: Identity in a technological society (pp. 592–608).Hershey, PA: Idea Group Global publishers.
Melson, G.F., Kahn, P.H. Jr., Beck, A., & Friedman, B. (2009). Robotic pets in human lives: Implications for the human-animal bond and for human relationships with personified technologies. Journal of Social Issues, 651, 545–567.
Repacholi, B.M. (1998). Infants’ use of attentional cues to identify the referent of another person’s emotional expression. Developmental Psychology, 341, 1017–1025.
Turkle, S. (2012). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. NY: Basic Books.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Melson, Gail F., Aubrey H. Fine & Jennifer F. VonLintel
Díaz-Boladeras, Marta
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
