Cover not available

Article published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 15:1 (2014) ► pp.113–128

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Novelty preference in face perception by week-old lambs (Ovis aries)

Published online: 10 June 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.15.1.05ros
An extensive literature has been accumulating, in recent years, on face-processing in sheep and on the relevance of faces for social interaction in this species. In spite of this, spontaneous preferences for face or non-face stimuli in lambs have not been reported. In this study we tested the spontaneous preference of 8-day-old lambs (N = 9) for three pairs of stimuli. In each pair, one stimulus was a face-like display, whereas the other presented the same inner features displaced in unnatural positions. One pair of stimuli was obtained from photographic images of ewes’ faces, the other two pairs were schematic face-like stimuli. Lambs could differentiate the two stimuli obtained by photos of conspecifics, looking longer at the non-face stimulus (p < 0.05). We interpret this as a novelty preference, proving that few day-old lambs have already encoded the structural properties that define a face and recognize violations of those general properties.
References (53)
Alexander, G., & Shillito Walser, E. (1977). Importance of visual cues from various body regions in maternal recognition of the young in Merino sheep (Ovis aries). Applied Animal Ethology, 31, 137–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouissou, M.F., Porter, R.H., Boyle, L., & Ferreira, G. (1996). Influence of a conspecific image of own vs. different breed on fear reactions of ewes. Behavioural Processes, 381, 37–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, S.D., & Dooling, R.J. (1992). Perception of conspecific faces by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): I. Natural faces. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1061, 203–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1993). Perception of conspecific faces by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): II. Synthetic models. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1071, 48–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Candland, D.K. (1969). Discriminability of facial regions used by the domestic chicken in maintaining the social dominance order. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 691, 281–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
da Costa, A.P., Leigh, A.E., Man, M., & Kendrick, K.M. (2004). Face pictures reduce behavioural, autonomic, endocrine and neural indices of stress and fear in sheep. Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 271(1552), 2077–2084. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dawkins, M.S. (1995). How do hens view other hens? The use of lateral and binocular visual fields in social recognition. Behaviour, 1321, 591–606. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996). Distance and social recognition in hens: implications for the use of photographs as social stimuli. Behaviour, 1331, 663–680. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, H.D., Shepherd, J.W., & Davies, G.M. (1979). Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from the internal and external features: Some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception, 81, 431–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farah, M.J., Rabinowitz, C., Quinn, G.E., & Liu, G.T. (2000). Early commitment of neural substrates for face recognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 171, 117–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farroni, T., Menon, E., Rigato, S., & Johnson, M.H. (2007). The perception of facial expressions in newborns. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 41, 2–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farroni, T., Menon, E., & Johnson, M.H. (2006). Factors influencing newborns’ preference for faces with eye contact. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 951, 298–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farroni, T., Johnson, M.H., Menon, E., Zulian, L., Faraguna, D., & Csibra G. (2005). Newborns’ preference for face-relevant stimuli: effects of contrast polarity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1021, 17245–17250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guhl, A.M., & Ortman, L.L. (1953). Visual patterns in the recognition of individuals among chickens. The Condor, 551, 287–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hainline, L. (1978). Developmental changes in visual scanning of face and nonface patterns by infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 251, 90–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haith, M., Bergman, T., & Moore, M. (1977). Eye contact and face scanning in early infancy. Science, 1981, 853–855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M.H. (2005). Subcortical face processing. Nature Review of Neuroscience, 61, 766–774. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanwisher, N. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 31, 759–763. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, K.M. (1991). How the sheep’s brain controls the visual recognition of animals and humans. Journal of Animal Science, 691, 5008–5016.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994). Neurobiological correlates of visual and olfactory recognition in sheep. Behavioural Processes, 331, 89–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998). Intelligent perception. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 571, 213–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, K.M., Atkins, K., Hinton, M.R., Heavens, P., & Keverne, E.B. (1996). Are faces special for sheep? Evidence from facial and symbol discrimination learning tests showing effects of inversion and social familiarity. Behavioural Processes, 381, 19–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, K.M., & Baldwin, B.A. (1987). Cells in temporal cortex of conscious sheep can respond preferentially to the sight of faces, Science, 236(4800), 448–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, K.N., Da Costa, A.P., Leigh, A.E., Hinton, M.R., & Peirce, J.W. (2001). Sheep don’t forget a face. Nature, 4411, 165–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, K.M., Hinton, M.R., Atkins, K., & Keverne, E.B. (1995). Facial discrimination in sheep. Animal Behaviour, 491, 1665–1676. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leo, I., & Simion, F. (2009). Face processing at birth: a Thatcher illusion study. Developmental Science, 121, 492–498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindsay, S.R. (2000). Handbook of applied dog behaviour and training: Volume one -adaptation and learning. Iowa: Iowa State University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macchi Cassia, V., Turati, C., & Simion, S. (2004). Can a nonspecific bias toward top-heavy patterns explain newborns’ face preference? Psychological Science, 151, 379–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C.J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 61, 255–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milewski, A. (1976). Infant’s discrimination of internal and external pattern elements. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 221, 229–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morton, J., & Johnson, M.H. (1991). CONSPEC and CON- LERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 981, 164–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nelson, C.A. (2001). The development and neural bases of face recognition. Infant and Child Development, 101, 3–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nowak, R. (1990). Mother and sibling discrimination at a distance by three- to seven-day-old lambs. Developmental Psychology, 231, 285–295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991). Senses involved in discrimination of merino ewes at close contact and from a distance by their newborn lambs. Animal Behaviour, 421, 357–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parrott, R.F., Houpt, K.A., & Misson, B.H. (1988). Modifications of the responses of sheep to isolation stress by the use of mirror panels. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 191, 331–338. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perrett, D.I., Hietanen, J.K., Oram, M.W., & Benson, P.J. (1992). Organization and function of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 3351, 23–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, J.W., Leigh, A.E., & Kendrick, K.M. (2000). Configurational coding, familiarity and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition in sheep. Neuropsychologia, 381, 475–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Porter, R.H., & Bouissou, M.F. (1999). Discriminative responsiveness by lambs to visual images of conspecifics. Behavioural Processes, 481, 101–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Regolin, L., Rugani, R., Stancher, G., & Vallortigara, G. (2011). Spontaneous discrimination of possible and impossible objects by newly hatched chicks. Biology Letters, 7(5), 654–657. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosa-Salva, O., Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G. (2010). Faces are special for newly hatched chicks: evidence for inborn domain-specific mechanisms underlying spontaneous preferences for face-like stimuli. Developmental Science, 13(4), 565–577. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosa Salva, O., Farroni, T., Regolin, L., Vallortigara, G., & Johnson, M.H. (2011). The evolution of social orienting: Evidence from chicks (Gallus gallus) and human newborns. PLoS One, 6(4), e18802. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosa Salva, O., Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G. (2012). Inversion of contrast polarity abolishes spontaneous preferences for face-like stimuli in newborn chicks. Behavioural Brain Research, 2281, 133–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shillito, E., & Alexander, G. (1975). Mutual recognition amongst ewes and lambs of four breeds of sheep (Ovis aries). Applied Animal Ethology, 11, 151–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sugita, Y. (2008). Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1051, 394–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tate, A.J., Fischer, H., Leigh, A.E., & Kendrick, K.M. (2006). Behavioural and neurophysiological evidence for face identity and face emotion processing in animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 3611, 2155–2172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tibbetts, E.A. (2002). Visual signals of individual identity in the wasp Polistes fuscatus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 2691, 1423–1428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tovée, M.J. (1998). Is face processing special? Neuron, 211, 1239–1242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turati, C., Bulf, H., & Simion, F. (2007). Newborns’ face recognition over changes in viewpoint. Cognition, 1061, 1300–1321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turati, C., Macchi Cassia, V., Simion, F., & Leo, I. (2006). Newborns’ face recognition: role of inner and outer facial features. Child Development, 771, 297–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turati, C., & Simion, F. (2002). Newborns’ recognition of changing and unchanging aspects of schematic faces. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 831, 239–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turati, C., Simion, F., Milani, I., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Newborns’ preference for faces: What is crucial? Developmental Psychology, 61, 875–882. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Velden, J., Zheng, Y., Patullo, B.W., & Macmillan, D.L. (2008). Crayfish recognize the faces of fight opponents. PLoS One, 31, e1695. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walser, E.S., & Alexander, G. (1980). Mutual recognition between ewes and lambs. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development, 20(3B), 807–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Freitas-de-Melo, Aline, Agustín Orihuela, Maria José Hötzel & Rodolfo Ungerfeld
2022. What Do We Know and Need to Know About Weaning in Sheep? An Overview of Weaning Practises, Stress and Welfare. Frontiers in Animal Science 3 DOI logo
Ungerfeld, Rodolfo, Alice Fernández-Werner, Özdal Gökdal, Okan Atay & Aline Freitas-de-Melo
2021. Lambs identify their mothers’ bleats but not a picture of her face. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 46 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue