Robots can be perceived as goal-oriented agents

Sciutti, Alessandra; Bisio, Ambra; Nori, Francesco; Metta, Giorgio; Fadiga, Luciano; Sandini, Giulio

doi:10.1075/is.14.3.02sci

Article published In: Gaze in human-robot communication
Guest-edited by Frank Broz, Hagen Lehmann, Bilge Mutlu and Yukiko Nakano
[Interaction Studies 14:3] 2013
► pp. 329–350

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

Robots can be perceived as goal-oriented agents

Alessandra Sciutti | Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Dept., Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia

Ambra Bisio | Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Dept., Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia

Francesco Nori | Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Dept., Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia

Giorgio Metta | Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Dept., Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia

Luciano Fadiga | Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Dept., Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia

Giulio Sandini | Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Dept., Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia

Published online: 10 June 2014

https://doi.org/10.1075/is.14.3.02sci

Understanding the goals of others is fundamental for any kind of interpersonal interaction and collaboration. From a neurocognitive perspective, intention understanding has been proposed to depend on an involvement of the observer’s motor system in the prediction of the observed actions (Nyström et al. 2011; Rizzolatti & Sinigaglia 2010; Southgate et al. 2009). An open question is if a similar understanding of the goal mediated by motor resonance can occur not only between humans, but also for humanoid robots. In this study we investigated whether goal-oriented robotic actions can induce motor resonance by measuring the appearance of anticipatory gaze shifts to the goal during action observation. Our results indicate a similar implicit processing of humans’ and robots’ actions and propose to use anticipatory gaze behaviour as a tool for the evaluation of human-robot interactions. Keywords: Humanoid robot; motor resonance; anticipation; proactive gaze; action understanding

Cited by (36)

Cited by 36 other publications

Order by:

Datteri, Edoardo

2025. Folk-Ontological Stances Towards Robots and Psychological Human Likeness. International Journal of Social Robotics 17:2 ► pp. 257 ff.

van Den broek, Marike Koch & Thomas B. Moeslund

2024. What is Proactive Human-Robot Interaction? - A Review of a Progressive Field and Its Definitions. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 13:4 ► pp. 1 ff.

Lagerstedt, Erik & Serge Thill

2023. Multiple Roles of Multimodality Among Interacting Agents. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 12:2 ► pp. 1 ff.

Ziemke, Tom

2023. Understanding Social Robots: Attribution of Intentional Agency to Artificial and Biological Bodies. Artificial Life 29:3 ► pp. 351 ff.

Edwards, Autumn & Chad Edwards

2022. Does the Correspondence Bias Apply to Social Robots?: Dispositional and Situational Attributions of Human Versus Robot Behavior. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8

Kim, Sangmin, Jongsuk Choi, Yoonseob Lim & Sonya S. Kwak

2022. 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), ► pp. 8234 ff.

Thellman, Sam, Maartje de Graaf & Tom Ziemke

2022. Mental State Attribution to Robots: A Systematic Review of Conceptions, Methods, and Findings. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 11:4 ► pp. 1 ff.

Zonca, Joshua, Anna Folsø & Alessandra Sciutti

2021. The role of reciprocity in human-robot social influence. iScience 24:12 ► pp. 103424 ff.

Zonca, Joshua, Anna Folsø & Alessandra Sciutti

2023. Social Influence Under Uncertainty in Interaction with Peers, Robots and Computers. International Journal of Social Robotics 15:2 ► pp. 249 ff.

Edwards, Autumn, Chad Edwards & Andrew Gambino

2020. The Social Pragmatics of Communication with Social Robots: Effects of Robot Message Design Logic in a Regulative Context. International Journal of Social Robotics 12:4 ► pp. 945 ff.

Lindblom, Jessica & Beatrice Alenljung

2020. The ANEMONE: Theoretical Foundations for UX Evaluation of Action and Intention Recognition in Human-Robot Interaction. Sensors 20:15 ► pp. 4284 ff.

Stiber, Maia & Chien-Ming Huang

2020. Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, ► pp. 97 ff.

Thellman, Sam, Asenia Giagtzidou, Annika Silvervarg & Tom Ziemke

2020. Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ► pp. 473 ff.

Vasylkiv, Yurii, Heike Brock, Yu Fang, Eric Nichols, Keisuke Nakamura, Serge Thill & Randy Gomez

2020. An Exploration of Simple Reactive Responses for Conveying Aliveness Using the Haru Robot. In Social Robotics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12483], ► pp. 108 ff.

de Graaf, Maartje M.A. & Bertram F. Malle

2019. 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), ► pp. 239 ff.

Kolbeinsson, Ari, Erik Lagerstedt & Jessica Lindblom

2019. Foundation for a classification of collaboration levels for human-robot cooperation in manufacturing. Production & Manufacturing Research 7:1 ► pp. 448 ff.

Liang, Claire, Julia Proft, Erik Andersen & Ross A. Knepper

2019. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ► pp. 1 ff.

Székely, Marcell, Henry Powell, Fabio Vannucci, Francesco Rea, Alessandra Sciutti & John Michael

2019. The perception of a robot partner’s effort elicits a sense of commitment to human-robot interaction. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 20:2 ► pp. 234 ff.

Kupferberg, Aleksandra, Marco Iacoboni, Virginia Flanagin, Markus Huber, Anna Kasparbauer, Thomas Baumgartner, Gregor Hasler, Florian Schmidt, Christoph Borst & Stefan Glasauer

2018. Fronto‐parietal coding of goal‐directed actions performed by artificial agents. Human Brain Mapping 39:3 ► pp. 1145 ff.

Sandini, Giulio, Vishwanathan Mohan, Alessandra Sciutti & Pietro Morasso

2018. Social Cognition for Human-Robot Symbiosis—Challenges and Building Blocks. Frontiers in Neurorobotics 12

Dermy, Oriane, Alexandros Paraschos, Marco Ewerton, Jan Peters, François Charpillet & Serena Ivaldi

2017. Prediction of Intention during Interaction with iCub with Probabilistic Movement Primitives. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 4

Levillain, Florent, Elisabetta Zibetti & Sébastien Lefort

2017. Interacting with Non-anthropomorphic Robotic Artworks and Interpreting Their Behaviour. International Journal of Social Robotics 9:1 ► pp. 141 ff.

Michael, John & Alessandro Salice

2017. The Sense of Commitment in Human–Robot Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics 9:5 ► pp. 755 ff.

Sandini, Giulio, Alessandra Sciutti & Francesco Rea

2017. Movement-Based Communication for Humanoid-Human Interaction. In Humanoid Robotics: A Reference, ► pp. 1 ff.

Sandini, Giulio, Alessandra Sciutti & Francesco Rea

2019. Movement-Based Communication for Humanoid-Human Interaction. In Humanoid Robotics: A Reference, ► pp. 2169 ff.

Sciutti, Alessandra & Giulio Sandini

2017. Interacting With Robots to Investigate the Bases of Social Interaction. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 25:12 ► pp. 2295 ff.

Thellman, Sam, Annika Silvervarg & Tom Ziemke

2017. Folk-Psychological Interpretation of Human vs. Humanoid Robot Behavior: Exploring the Intentional Stance toward Robots. Frontiers in Psychology 8

Lyon, Caroline, Chrystopher L. Nehaniv, Joe Saunders, Tony Belpaeme, Ambra Bisio, Kerstin Fischer, Frank Förster, Hagen Lehmann, Giorgio Metta, Vishwanathan Mohan, Anthony Morse, Stefano Nolfi, Francesco Nori, Katharina Rohlfing, Alessandra Sciutti, Jun Tani, Elio Tuci, Britta Wrede, Arne Zeschel & Angelo Cangelosi

2016. Embodied Language Learning and Cognitive Bootstrapping: Methods and Design Principles. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 13:3

Quadflieg, Susanne, Israr Ul-Haq & Nikolaos Mavridis

2016. Now you feel it, now you don’t. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 17:2 ► pp. 211 ff.

Svensson, Henrik & Serge Thill

2016. Beyond bodily anticipation: Internal simulations in social interaction. Cognitive Systems Research 40 ► pp. 161 ff.

Wykowska, Agnieszka, Thierry Chaminade & Gordon Cheng

2016. Embodied artificial agents for understanding human social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371:1693 ► pp. 20150375 ff.

Bono, Mayumi, Perla Maiolino, Augustin Lefebvre, Fulvio Mastrogiovanni & Hiroshi Ishiguro

2015. Challenges for Robots Acting on a Stage. In Handbook of Digital Games and Entertainment Technologies, ► pp. 1 ff.

Bono, Mayumi, Perla Maiolino, Augustin Lefebvre, Fulvio Mastrogiovanni & Hiroshi Ishiguro

2017. Challenges for Robots Acting on a Stage. In Handbook of Digital Games and Entertainment Technologies, ► pp. 935 ff.

Sciutti, Alessandra, Caterina Ansuini, Cristina Becchio & Giulio Sandini

2015. Investigating the ability to read others’ intentions using humanoid robots. Frontiers in Psychology 6

Srinivasan, Vasant, Robin R. Murphy & Cindy L. Bethel

2015. A Reference Architecture for Social Head Gaze Generation in Social Robotics. International Journal of Social Robotics 7:5 ► pp. 601 ff.

Sciutti, Alessandra, Laura Patane, Oskar Palinko, Francesco Nori & Giulio Sandini

2014. 4th International Conference on Development and Learning and on Epigenetic Robotics, ► pp. 331 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.