Cover not available

Review published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 10:1 (2009) ► pp.101–105

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Jean-Louis Dessalles. Why We Talk: The Evolutionary Origins of Language. Jean-Louis Dessalles.

Reviewed by
Published online: 24 March 2009
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.10.1.05wha
References (14)
References
Chomsky, N. (1988). Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., M. Hauser & T. Fitch. (2002). The faculty of language: who has it, what is it and how did it evolve? Science, Vol. 298, no. 5598, pp. 1569–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elderedge, N. & S. J. Gould. (1972). Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism. In Schopf, T. (ed.) Models in Paleobiology. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper and Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. & R. Lewontin. (1979). The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Program. In Selzer, J. (1993). Understanding Scientific Prose. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Origgi, G., & Sperber, D. (2000). Evolution, communication and the proper function of language. In P. Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolution and the human mind: modularity, language and meta-cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 140–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piatelli-Palmarini, M. (1989). Evolution, Selection and Cognition: From ‘learning’ to Parameter setting in biology and in the study of language. In Cognition 311, 1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (2000). Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In D. Sperber (ed.) Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 117–137.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). An Evolutionary perspective on testimony and argumentation. Philosophical Topics. 291; 401–413. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Does the Selection task detect cheater detection? (In Fitness, J. & Sterelny, K. (eds.) From Mating to Mentality: Evaluating Evolutionary Psychology, Monographs in Cognitive Science. Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & G. Origgi. (2005). Pourquoi parler, comment comprendre? In Jean-Marie Hombert, (ed.) L’origine de l’homme, du langage et des langues. Paris: Fayard; 236–253Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson. (1986/1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. In Mind and Language, Vol. 171. Oxford: Blackwell; 3–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wharton, T. (2006). The evolution of pragmatics. In The Elsevier Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(forthcoming) The Pragmatics of Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Sivakumar, Menon Swathi & Vinod Balakrishnan
2022. Theorizing Language Evolution Using NCT and Conlangs: An Etiological Study. Journal of Asian Linguistic Anthropology 4:2 ► pp. 70 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue