Article published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 25:1 (2024) ► pp.36–69
Towards accessible robot-assisted physical play for children with physical disabilities
MyJay, from user-centred design to an initial feasibility study
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
This article was made Open Access under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license through payment of an APC by or on behalf of the authors.
Published online: 7 June 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.00023.mah
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.00023.mah
Abstract
MyJay is an open-source robot designed to facilitate play between children with and without physical disabilities.
The robot acts as a proxy for children with upper limb challenges, allowing them to participate in physical games with their
peers. Our design was inspired by the FIRST Robotics Competition, which involves teleoperating robots to manipulate objects.
Taking a user-centred perspective, we consulted therapists and conducted remote interviews with children with disabilities and
their guardians at various stages of the design process. We then conducted an in-person feasibility study with 18 typically
developing children in a school setting. The study involved children teleoperating the robot to pick up and throw balls into a
designated goal, and the interaction was evaluated using the user experience questionnaire and the Robotic Social Attributes
Scale. The results of the study show great potential for MyJay to act as a play mediator in various scenarios, and the response
from the children was positive. The ultimate aim of our research agenda is to pave the way towards creating more inclusive play
environments through robot-mediated interactions, breaking barriers posed by physical limitations.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- Extending previous work
- Overview of the article
- 2.Designing MyJay
- 2.1Overview of the design process
- 2.2Robot design
- 2.2.1Drivetrain
- 2.2.2Intake, elevator and flywheel
- 2.2.3Electronics
- 2.2.4Software
- 2.2.5Shell design
- 3.Methods
- 3.1Consulting therapists
- 3.2Feedback from children with disabilities and their guardians
- 3.2.1Protocol
- 3.2.2Participants
- 3.3Feasibility study
- 3.3.1Study setup
- 3.3.2Data collection
- 3.3.3Protocol
- 3.3.4Participants
- 4.Results
- 4.1Feedback from therapists
- 4.2Feedback from children with disabilities and their guardians
- 4.2.1Thematic analysis
- 4.2.2Personas
- 4.3Feasibility study
- 4.3.1Questionnaire analysis
- 4.3.2Video analysis
- 4.3.3Other observations
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Online interviews with therapists
- 5.2Online interviews with children and their guardians
- 5.3In-person feasibility study
- 6.Conclusion and limitations
- 6.1Limitations
- 7.Perspectives and future research directions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (56)
Adams, K., Julie, Y., & Cook, A. (2008). Lego
robot control via a speech generating communication device for play and educational
activities. RESNA Annual Conference. [URL]
Ali, S., Moroso, T., & Breazeal, C. (2019). Can
children learn creativity from a social robot? In Proceedings of the
2019 on creativity and
cognition (pp. 359–368).
Alves-Oliveira, P., Arriaga, P., Paiva, A., & Hoffman, G. (2019). Guide
to build yolo, a creativity-stimulating robot for
children. HardwareX, 61, e00074.
Anderson, D. M., Bedini, L. A., & Moreland, L. (2005). Getting
all girls into the game: Physically active recreation for girls with disabilities. Journal of
Park & Recreation
Administration, 23 (4).
Azizi, N. (2022). Exploring
the use of assistive robotics in play and education for children with disabilities (Master’s
thesis). University of Waterloo.
Besio, S. (2002). An
italian research project to study the play of children with motor disabilities: The first year of
activity. Disability and
rehabilitation, 24 (1–3), 72–79.
Besio, S., Bulgarelli, D., & Stancheva-Popkostadinova, V. (2017). Play
development in children with disabilties. De Gruyter Open Poland.
Bickford, R. G., Daly, D., & Keith, H. M. (1953). Convulsive
effects of light stimulation in children. AMA American journal of diseases of
children, 86 (2), 170–183. [URL].
Bjerke, T., Ødegårdstuen, T. S., & Kaltenborn, B. P. (1998). Attitudes
toward animals among norwegian children and adolescents: Species
preferences. Anthrozoös, 11 (4), 227–235. [URL].
Brock, M. E., Dueker, S. A., & Barczak, M. A. (2018). Brief
report: Improving social outcomes for students with autism at recess through peer-mediated pivotal response
training. Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorders, 48 (6), 22242230.
Canas, E., Garcia, A. M., Garrell, A., & Angulo, C. (2022). Initial
test of “babyrobot” behaviour on a teleoperated toy substitution: Improving the motor skills of
toddlers. 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
(HRI), 708–712.
Dautenhahn, K., Nehaniv, C., Walters, M., Robins, B., Kose, H., Mirza, N., & Blow, M. (2009). Kaspar –
a minimally expressive humanoid robot for human-robot interaction research. Applied Bionics and
Biomechanics, 61, 369–397.
de Wit, J., Willemsen, B., de Haas, M., Krahmer, E., Vogt, P., Merckens, M., Oostdijk, R., Savelberg, C., Verdult, S., & Wolfert, P. (2019). Playing
charades with a robot: Collecting a large dataset of human gestures through hri. 2019 14th
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
(HRI), 634–635.
dos Santos, T. F., de Castro, D. G., Masiero, A. A., & Aquino Junior, P. T. (2014). Behavioral
persona for human-robot interaction: A study based on pet robot. Human-Computer Interaction.
Advanced Interaction Modalities and Techniques: 16th International Conference, HCI International 2014, Heraklion, Crete,
Greece, June 22–27, 2014, Proceedings, Part II
16, 687–696.
Duque, I., Dautenhahn, K., Koay, K. L., Christianson, B., et al. (2013). A
different approach of using personas in human-robot interaction: Integrating personas as computational models to modify robot
companions’ behaviour. 2013 IEEE
RO-MAN, 424–429.
Ferrari, E., Robins, B., & Dautenhahn, K. (2009). Therapeutic
and educational objectives in robot assisted play for children with autism. RO-MAN 2009-The
18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive
communication, 108–114.
Field, S. J., & Oates, R. K. (2001). Sport
and recreation activities and opportunities for children with spina bifida and cystic
fibrosis. Journal of Science and Medicine in
Sport, 4 (1), 71–76.
Goldstein, H., English, K., Shafer, K., & Kaczmarek, L. (1997). Interaction
among preschoolers with and without disabilities: Effects of across-the-day peer
intervention. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing
Research, 40 (1), 33–48.
Golinkoff, R. M., Chung, H. L., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Liu, J., Bertenthal, B. I., Brand, R., Maguire, M. J., & Hennon, E. (2002). Young
children can extend motion verbs to point-light displays. Developmental
psychology, 38 (4), 604. [URL]
Gordon, N. S., Burke, S., Akil, H., Watson, S. J., & Panksepp, J. (2003). Socially-induced
brain ‘fertilization’: Play promotes brain derived neurotrophic factor transcription in the amygdala and dorsolateral frontal
cortex in juvenile rats. Neuroscience
letters, 341 (1), 17–20.
Hutzler, Y., Fliess, O., Chacham, A., & Van den Auweele, Y. (2002). Perspectives
of children with physical disabilities on inclusion and empowerment: Supporting and limiting
factors. Adapted physical activity
quarterly, 19 (3), 300–317.
Kanda, S., Sawabe, T., Kanbara, M., Fujimoto, Y., & Kato, H. (2022). A
communication robot for playing video games together to boost motivation for daily-use. 2022
17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
(HRI), 831–833.
Koay, K. L., Webster, M., Dixon, C., Gainer, P., Syrdal, D., Fisher, M., & Dautenhahn, K. (2021). Use
and usability of software verification methods to detect behaviour interference when teaching an assistive home companion
robot: A proof-of-concept study. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral
Robotics, 12 (1), 402–422.
Kronreif, G., Prazak-Aram, B., Kornfeld, M., Stainer-Hochgatterer, A., & Fürst, M. (2007). Robot
assistant “PlayROB” – user trials and results. RO-MAN 2007 – The 16th IEEE International
Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive
Communication, 113–117.
Kronreif, G., Prazak-Aram, B., Mina, S., Kornfeld, M., Meindl, M., & Fürst, M. (2005). PlayROB –
Robot-assisted playing for children with severe physical disabilities. Proceedings of the IEEE
9th International Conference on Rehabilitation
Robotics, 193–196.
Lathan, C., Brisben, A., & Safos, C. (2005). Cosmobot
levels the playing field for disabled
children. Interactions, 12 (2), 14–16.
Mahdi, H. (2021). Developing
a semi-autonomous robot to engage children with special needs and their peers in robot-assisted
play (Master’s thesis). University of Waterloo.
Mahdi, H., Saleh, S., Sanoubari, E., & Dautenhahn, K. (2021). User-centered
social robot design: Involving children with special needs in an online world. 2021 30th IEEE
International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication
(RO-MAN), 844–851.
Mahdi, H., Saleh, S., Shariff, O., & Dautenhahn, K. (2020). Creating
myjay: A new design for robot-assisted play for children with physical special
needs. International Conference on Social
Robotics, 676–687.
Michaud, F., & Théberge-Turmel, C. (2002). Mobile
robotic toys and autism. In Socially intelligent
agents (pp. 125–132). Springer.
Minamoto, A., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Aimoji,
an affordable interaction kit that upcycles used toy as companion robot. Companion of the 2023
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot
Interaction, 798–801.
Muñoz, J. E., & Dautenhahn, K. (2021). Robo
ludens: A game design taxonomy for multiplayer games using socially interactive robots. ACM
Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
(THRI), 10 (4), 1–28.
Papadopoulos, F., Dautenhahn, K., & Ho, W. C. (2012). Exploring
the use of robots as social mediators in a remote human-human collaborative communication
experiment. Paladyn, 3 (1), 1–10.
Plass, J. L., O’Keefe, P. A., Homer, B. D., Case, J., Hayward, E. O., Stein, M., & Perlin, K. (2013). The
impact of individual, competitive, and collaborative mathematics game play on learning, performance, and
motivation. Journal of educational
psychology, 105 (4), 1050.
Raj, L., & Czmerk, A. (2017). Modelling
and simulation of the drivetrain of an omnidirectional mobile robot. Automatika: časopis za
automatiku, mjerenje, elektroniku, računarstvo i
komunikacije, 58 (2), 232–243.
Rios-Rincon, A. M., Adams, K., Magill-Evans, J., & Cook, A. (2016). Playfulness
in children with limited motor abilities when using a robot [PMID: 26566226]. Physical &
Occupational Therapy in
Pediatrics, 36 (3), 232–246.
Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., & Dickerson, P. (2009). From
isolation to communication: A case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally
expressive humanoid robot. 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human
Interactions, 205–211.
Sandoval, E. B., Shi, J., Cruz-Sandoval, D., Li, B., Cappuccio, M., & Rosenbaum, S. (2021). A
prototype of a robot memory game: Exploring the technical limitations of human-robot interaction in a playful
context. Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot
Interaction, 195–199.
Scassellati, B., Boccanfuso, L., Huang, C.-M., Mademtzi, M., Qin, M., Salomons, N., Ventola, P., & Shic, F. (2018). Improving
social skills in children with asd using a long-term, in-home social robot. Science
Robotics, 3 (21).
Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., & Thomaschewski, J. (2017). Design
and evaluation of a short version of the user experience questionnaire (ueq-s). International
Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial
Intelligence, 4 (6), 103–108.
Shields, N., Synnot, A. J., & Barr, M. (2012). Perceived
barriers and facilitators to physical activity for children with disability: A systematic
review. British journal of sports
medicine, 46 (14), 989–997.
Smyth, M. M., & Anderson, H. I. (2000). Coping
with clumsiness in the school playground: Social and physical play in children with coordination
impairments. British Journal of Developmental
Psychology, 18 (3), 389–413.
Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., Braun, V., Willig, C., & Rogers, W. S. (2017). The
sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research
in
Psychology, 21, 17–36.
Timmerman, E., & Ligthart, M. E. (2023). Let’s
roll together: Children helping a robot play a dice game. Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE
International Conference on Human-Robot
Interaction, 476–480.
Tipper, B. (2011). A
dog who i know quite well: Everyday relationships between children and animals. Children’s
Geographies, 9 (2), 145–165.
Urichuk, L., & Anderson, D. (2003). Improving
mental health through animal-assisted therapy. Chimo Project Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. [URL]
Van den Heuvel, R., Lexis, M., & De Witte, L. P. (2017a). Robot
ZORA in rehabilitation and special education for children with severe physical disabilities: A pilot
study. International Journal of Rehabilitation
Research, 40 (4), 353–359.
Van den Heuvel, R., Lexis, M., Janssens, R. M., Marti, P., & De Witte, L. P. (2017b). Robots
supporting play for children with physical disabilities: Exploring the potential of
IROMEC. Technology and
Disability, 29 (3), 109–120.
Vázquez, M., May, A., Steinfeld, A., & Chen, W.-H. (2011). A
deceptive robot referee in a multiplayer gaming environment. 2011 international conference on
collaboration technologies and systems (CTS), 204–211.
Wiberg, C., Harbottle, N., Cook, A. M., Adams, K., & Schulmeister, J. (2006). Robot
assisted play for children with disabilities. 29th Annual RESNA Conference
Proceedings. [URL]
Wilkinson, P., et al. (1983). Disabled
children and integrated play environments. Recreation Research
Review, 10 (1), 20–28.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Gallardo-Montes, Carmen del Pilar, Inmaculada Ávalos-Ruiz, Lara Checa-Domene & Christian Cid-González
Mohan, Mayumi, Rachael L’Orsa, Felix Grüninger, Bernadette-Marie Stollhof, Carolin Sarah Klein, Raphael Dinauer, Rachael Bevill Burns, Tobias J. Renner, Karsten Hollmann & Katherine J. Kuchenbecker
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
