Cover not available

Introduction published In: Envisioning Social Robotics: Current challenges and new interdisciplinary methodologies
Edited by Glenda Hannibal and Astrid Weiss
[Interaction Studies 21:1] 2020
► pp. 1–6

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
Introduction

Envisioning social robotics

Current challenges and new interdisciplinary methodologies

 | TU Wien
 | TU Wien


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 24 January 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.00004.int
Article outline
  • Contributions
  • References
References (22)
References
Arnold, L., Jin Lee, K., & Yip, J. C. (2016). Co-designing with children: An approach to social robot design. Retrieved from [URL]
Bartneck, C., & Forlizzi, J. (2004). A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction. In RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 591–594). Kurashiki, Japan: IEEE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertel, L. B., Rasmussen, D. M., & Christiansen, E. (2013). Robots for Real: Developing a Participatory Design Framework for Implementing Educational Robots in Real-World Learning Environments (pp. 437–444). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward Sociable Robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 421, 167–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coeckelbergh, M. (2012). Growing Moral Relations – Critique of Moral Status Ascription. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dautenhahn, K. (1998). The art of designing socially intelligent agents: science, fiction, and the human in the loop. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 12(7–8), 573–617. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Graaf, M., Allouch, S., & Klamer, T. (2015). Sharing a life with Harvey: Exploring the acceptance of and relationship-building with a social robot. Computers in Human Behavior, 431, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4), 143–166. Retrieved from [URL]
Forlizzi, J., & Disalvo, C. (2006). Service Robots in the Domestic Environment: A Study of the Roomba Vacuum in the Home. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction (HRI) (pp. 258–265). New York, USA: ACM. Retrieved from [URL].
Frennert, S., Eftring, H., & Östlund, B. (2013). Older People’s Involvement in the Development of a Social Assistive Robot (pp. 8–18). Springer, Cham. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gunkel, D. J. (2012). The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics. The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hannibal, G., & Lindner, F. (2018). Transdisciplinary Reflections on Social Robotics in Academia and Beyond. In M. Coeckelbergh, J. Loh, M. Funk, J. Seibt, & M. Nørskov (Eds.), Envisioning Robots in Society–Power, Politics, and Public Space – Proceedings of Robophilosophy/TRANSOR 2018 (pp. 23–27). Amsterdam: IOS-Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahn, P. H., Freier, N. G., Friedman, B., Severson, R. L., & Feldman, E. N. (2004). Social and moral relationships with robotic others? RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, (OCTOBER 2004), 545–550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kidd, C. D., & Breazeal, C. (2008). Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction. In 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 3230–3235). IEEE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, & Practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meister, M. (2014). When is a robot really social? An outline of the Robot Sociologicus. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 10(1), 107–134. Retrieved from [URL]
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Sciences (Vol. 41). Retrieved from [URL]
Šabanović, S., Chang, W.-L., Bennett, C. C., Piatt, J. A., & Hakken, D. (2015). A Robot of My Own: Participatory Design of Socially Assistive Robots for Independently Living Older Adults Diagnosed with Depression (pp. 104–114). Springer, Cham. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2010). Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(1), 27–40. Retrieved from [URL]
Sparrow, R., & Sparrow, L. (2006). In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds and Machines, 16(2), 141–161. Retrieved from [URL]
Sung, J., Christensen, H. I., & Grinter, R. E. (2009). Robots in the wild: Understanding Long-term Use. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction – HRI ’09, 451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turkle, S. (2010). Alone Together – Why We Expect More From Technology and Less From Each Other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Khaksar, Weria, Diana Saplacan Lindblom, Lee Andrew Bygrave & Jim Torresen
2025. Robotics in Elderly Healthcare: A Qualitative Analysis of 20 Recent European Research Projects. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 14:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue