Cover not available

Article published In: IPrA Papers in Pragmatics
Vol. 4:1/2 (1990) ► pp.183–196

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

On formulating reference

An interactional approach to relative clauses in English conversation

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 January 1990
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/iprapip.4.1-2.05fox
References (19)
Clancy, P. 1980. Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In W. Chafe (ed.) The Pear Stories. New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. 1980. "Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse." In W. Chafe (ed.) The Pear Stories. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duranti, A. 1984. The social meaning of subject pronouns in Italian conversation. Text 41: 277-311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. 1977. Topics in lexical semantics. In R. Cole (ed.) Current issues in linguistic theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, B. 1987a. The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy revisited: subject primacy or the absolutive hypothesis? Language 631: 856-870. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987b. Discourse Structure and Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, B. and S. Thompson. 1990. "A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation." Language 661: 51-64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givon, T. (ed.). 1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. 1979. "The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation." In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosz, B. 1977. The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding. Stanford Research Institute Technical Notes 5.
Linde, C. 1979. Focus of attention and the choice of pronouns in discourse. In T. Givon (ed.) Syntax and Semantics, vol 12. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, E. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given and new information. In P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Redecker, G. 1987. Introductions of story characters in interactive and non-interactive narration. In J. Verscheuren and M. Bertucelli-Papi (eds.) The Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reichman, R. 1981. Plain speaking: a theory and grammar of spontaneous discourse. Cambridge, Mass: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, report 4681.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. 1972. On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. and E. Schegloff. 1979. Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. 1972. Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. In D. Sudnow (ed) Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1979. What's in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In R. Freedle (ed.) New Directions in Discourse Processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. (ed.). 1986. Culture, communication, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

McDonnell, Bradley
2020. The pragmatics of ‘light nouns’ in Besemah. In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128], ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
연재훈
2012. A functional-typological study on Korean relative clauses. Journal of Korean Linguistics null:63 ► pp. 413 ff. DOI logo
Geisler, Christer
1998. Infinitival relative clauses in spoken discourse. Language Variation and Change 10:1 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson
1996. Interaction and Syntax in the Structure of Conversational Discourse: Collaboration, Overlap, and Syntactic Dissociation. In Computational and Conversational Discourse [NATO ASI Series, 151], ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Fox, Barbara A.
1994. Contextualization, indexicality, and the distributed nature of grammar. Language Sciences 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bolkestein, A.Machtelt
1991. Syntax and pragmatics: Apartheid or integration?. Journal of Pragmatics 16:2 ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue