Article published In: Internet Pragmatics: Online-First Articles
On the recontextualization of meme quiddity
A case study of the TikTok meme #аясейчасвампокажу
Published online: 3 June 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00121.shu
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00121.shu
Abstract
This paper analyzes the discursive operation of recontextualization in shaping the multimodal meme quiddity of
#аясейчасвампокажу on TikTok (TT) by examining the interplay of platform design, the
pragmatic aim of the creator and user reactions. Meme quiddity is understood as a flexible (multimodal) configuration of semiotic
attributes recurrent in internet meme (IM) variants, serving as a contextualization cue and formative factor of an IM family
(Segev, Elad, Asaf Nissenbaum, Nathan Stolero, and Limor Shifman. 2015. “Families
and networks of internet memes: The relationship between cohesiveness, uniqueness, and quiddity
concreteness.” Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication 201: 417–433. ). The study employs top-down and bottom-up procedures combining
multimodal (critical) and socio-pragmatic discourse analyses. We focus on four user strategies for recontextualizing meme
quiddities: combining memes, replacing the element of quiddity, placing the quiddity in an absurd context, and embedding the
quiddity into new discourse. It was noted that the platform’s algorithm and affordances impact (1) the contextualization of
quiddity in the TT derivatives within a family; and (2) the modes of quiddity entextualization. Humor plays a pivotal role in
shaping social group cohesion and “playful patriotism.”
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.What is an internet meme?
- 3.Quiddity and recontextualization
- 4.Contextual characteristics of #аясейчасвампокажу
- 5.Meme characteristics of #аясейчасвампокажу
- 6.Data selection and methodology
- 7.Multimodal recontextualizations of #аясейчасвампокажу
- 7.1A meme within a meme
- 7.2Meme as an act of user’s performance
- 7.3Meme as dialogue
- 7.4Shift towards another discourse practice
- 8.Discussion and conclusions
- Declaration of conflicting interest
- Notes
References
References (55)
Akenzua, Kemi. 2019. “TikTok:
Transforming video-sharing.” Digital Innovation and Transformation: MBA Student
Perspectives. [URL] (accessed 12 May 2025).
Astapova, Anastasiya. 2021. Humor
and Rumor in the Post-Soviet Authoritorian
State. London: Lexington Books.
Batchelor, Tom. 2022. “Belarus
leader Lukashenko makes baseless claim UK responsible for Bucha
atrocities.” Independent. [URL] (accessed 12 May 2025).
Bateman, John, Janina Wildfeuer, and Tuomo Hiippala. 2017. Multimodality,
Foundations, Research and Analysis — A Problem-Oriented
Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bauman, Richard, and Charles L. Briggs. 1990. “Poetics
and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life.” Annual Review of
Anthropology 191: 59–88.
Beaugrande, Robert de, and Wolfgang Dressler. 1981. Introduction
to Text
Linguistics. London: Longman.
Bernstein, Basil. 1990. Class,
Codes and Control. Vol. 4: The Structuring of Pedagogic
Discourse. London: Routledge.
Boerner, Michaela, Stephen Joseph, and David Murphy. 2017. “The
association between sense of humor and trauma-related mental health outcomes: Two exploratory
studies.” Journal of Loss and
Trauma 22(5): 440–452.
Bondi, Marina, Silvia Cacchiani, and Davide Mazzi, eds. 2015. Discourse
in and through the Media: Recontextualizing and Reconceptualizing Expert Discoursee. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Briggs, Charles L., and Richard Bauman. 1992. “Genre,
intertextuality, and social power.” Journal of Linguistic
Anthropology 2(2): 131–172.
Bulatovic, Marina. 2019. “The
imitation game: The memefication of political discourse.” European
View 18(2): 250–253.
Bülow, Lars, and Michael Johann. 2023. “Effects
and perception of multimodal recontextualization in political Internet memes. Evidence from two online experiments in
Austria.” Frontiers in
Communication 71: 1–19.
Chen, Xu, D. Bondy Valdovinos Kaye, and Jing Zeng. 2020. “#PositiveEnergy
Douyin: Constructing ‘playful patriotism’ in a Chinese short-video application.” Chinese
Journal of
Communication 14(1): 97–117.
Conte, Rosaria. 2000. “Memes
through (social) minds.” In Darwinizing Culture: The Status of
Memetics as a Science, ed. by Robert Aunger, 83–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dancygier, Barbara, and Lieven Vandelanotte. 2017. “Internet
memes as multimodal constructions.” Cognitive
Linguistics 28(3): 565–598.
Darvin, Ron. 2022. “Design,
resistance and the performance of identity on TikTok.” Discourse, Context &
Media 461, 100591.
Dynel, Marta. 2024. “The
pragmatics of sharing memes on Twitter.” Journal of
Pragmatics 2201: 100–115.
Flowerdew, John, and John E. Richardson. 2018. “Introduction.” In The
Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 1–10. London: Routledge.
Gbadegesin, Victoria O. 2020. “Gender ideology and identity in
humorous social media memes.” Digital Scholarship in the
Humanities 35(3): 529–546.
Gruber, Helmut. 2017. “Quoting
and retweeting as communicative practices in computer mediated discourse.” Discourse, Context
& Media 201: 1–9.
. 2019. “Genres,
media, and recontextualization practices. Re-considering basic concepts of genre theory in the age of social
media.” Internet
Pragmatics 2(1): 54–82.
Jenkins, Henry. 2009. “If
it doesn’t spread, it’s dead (part two): Sticky and spreadable — two paradigms.” Henry
Jenkins. [URL] (accessed 12 May 2025).
Jewitt, Carey. 2017. “Different
approaches to multimodality.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal
Analysis, ed. by Carey Jewitt, 31–43. London: Routledge.
Kirner-Ludwig, Monika. 2020. “Internet
memes as multilayered re-contextualization vehicles in lay-political online
discourse.” Internet
Pragmatics 3(2): 283–320.
Klug, Nina-Maria. 2023. “Verstehen auf den ersten Blick — oder doch nicht? Zur (vermeintlichen) Einfachheit kleiner Texte am Beispiel von
Internet-Memes [Understanding at first glance — or not? On the (supposed)
simplicity of short texts using internet memes as an
example].” In Textkomplexität und Textverstehen: Studien zur
Verständlichkeit von Texten [Text Complexity and Text Comprehension:
Studies on the Understandability of Texts], ed. by Angela Schrott, Johanna Wolf, and Christine Pflüger, 195–230. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.
Kramer, Olaf, and Markus Gottschling (eds). 2021. Recontextualized
Knowledge: Rhetoric — Situation — Science
Communication. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Krause, Wolf-Dieter. 2000. “Kommunikationslinguistische Aspekte der Textsortenbestimmung [Communicative-linguistic aspects of text type determination].” In Textsorten. Kommunikationslinguistische Und Konfrontative Aspekte [Text Types: Communicative-Linguistic and Contrastive Aspects], ed. by Wolf-Dieter Krause, 34–67. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Kress, Gunther, and Jeff Bezemer. 2023. “Multimodal
discourse analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse
Analysis (2nd edn.), ed. by Michael Handford, and James Paul Gee, 139–155. Abingdon: Routledge.
Krieg-Holz, Ulrike, and Lars Bülow. 2019. “Internet-Memes: Praktik oder Textsorte [Internet memes:
Practice or text type]?” In Politische Internet-Memes —
Theoretische Herausforderungen und Empirische Befunde [Political Internet Memes —
Theoretical Challenges and Empirical Findings], ed. by Lars Bülow, and Michael Johann, 89–113. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
Latushko, Pavel. 2021. “EU
must step up pressure on Alexander Lukashenko’s regime in
Belarus.” Politico. [URL] (accessed
on 12 May 2025).
Ledin, Per, and David Machin. 2018. “Multi-modal
critical discourse analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical
Discourse Studies, ed. by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 60–76. Abingdon: Routledge.
Leeuwen, Theo van. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for
Critical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leeuwen, Theo van, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “Legitimizing
immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis.” Discourse
Studies 1(1): 83–118.
Li, Run. 2024. “Platformisation
practice for emancipation or subordination? A multimodal critical discourse study of self-presentations of African-Chinese
families on Douyin.” Critical
Arts: 1–18.
Machin, David, and Andrea Mayr. 2012. How
To Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal
Introduction. London: SAGE.
Malodia, Suresh, Amandeep Dhir, Anil Bilgihan, Pranao Sinha, and Tanishka Tikoo. 2022. “Meme
marketing: How can marketers drive better engagement using viral memes?” Psychology &
Marketing 39(9): 1775–1800.
Meier-Vieracker, Simon. 2023. “Memefication: Rekontextualisierung politischer Rede in digitalen Diskursen [Memefication: Recontextualizing political speech in digital
discourses].” In Remotivierung: Von Der Morphologie Bis
Zur Pragmatik [Remotivation: From Morphology to
Pragmatics], ed. by Igor Trost, 215–244. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Mordecai, Chandler. 2023. “#anxiety:
A multimodal discourse analysis of narrations of anxiety on TikTok.” Computers and
Composition 671: 1–15.
Nieborg, David B., and Thomas Poell. 2018. “The
platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity.” New
Media &
Society 20(11): 4275–4292.
O’Halloran, Kay L. 2006. Multimodal Discourse Analysis:
Systemic-functional
Perspectives. London: Continuum.
Osterroth, Andreas. 2019. “Sprache-Bild-Kommunikation in Imageboards: Das Internet-Meme als multimodaler Kommunikationsakt in alternativen
Öffentlichkeiten [Linguistic-pictorial communication in imageboards: The
internet meme as a multimodal communicative act in alternative public
spheres].” In Alternative Öffentlichkeiten: Soziale
Medien Zwischen Partizipation, Sharing und Vergemeinschaftung [Alternative Public
Spheres: Social Media Between Participation, Sharing, and Communalization], ed.
by Stefan Hauser, Roman Opilowski, and Eva L. Wyss, 269–286. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
Rice-Oxley, Mark. 2014. “Belarus:
20 years under dictatorship and a revolution behind the rest of Europe.” The
Guardian. [URL] (accessed 12 May 2025).
Roshchina, Olena. 2022. “Putin
tells Lukashenko about ‘positive changes’ in negotiations with Ukraine.” Ukrainska
Pravda. [URL] (accessed 12 May 2025).
Segev, Elad, Asaf Nissenbaum, Nathan Stolero, and Limor Shifman. 2015. “Families
and networks of internet memes: The relationship between cohesiveness, uniqueness, and quiddity
concreteness.” Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication 201: 417–433.
Shifman, Limor. 2013. “Memes
in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker.” Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication 18(3): 362–377.
Tagg, Caroline, and Tereza Spilioti. 2022. “Research
ethics.” In Research Methods for Digital Discourse
Analysis, ed. by Camilla Vásquez, 91–113. London: Bloomsbury.
Viher, Stina. 2021. Kommunikation in Sozialen Netzwerken via Memes: Zur (Re)Konstruktion sowie damit Verbundener Form und Funktion
der Text-Bild-Hybride auf Facebook [Communication in Social Networks via Memes: On
the (Re)Construction and Associated Forms and Functions of Text-Image Hybrids on
Facebook]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Wiggins, Bradley E. 2020. The Discursive Power of Memes in
Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics, and Intertextuality. New York: Routledge.