Cover not available

Article published In: Internet Pragmatics
Vol. 7:2 (2024) ► pp.219–248

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Humorous but hateful

Linguistic impoliteness and visual dysphemism in anti-Muslim memes

 | Mustansiriyah University
Published online: 6 February 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00106.alt
Abstract
The paper explores the interplay of impoliteness, ethnic/religious humor and multimodality in online contexts. The argument advanced in the paper is that anti-Muslim memes are instantiations of ethno-religious humor that creatively incorporate linguistic impoliteness and visual dysphemism in manners that potentially propagate Islamophobia online. The analysis of a specialized corpus of memes suggests that multimodal impoliteness in these memes is mainly triggered by marked implicitness, reinforced by visual reference to targets. The humor-generating incongruity in these memes is often based on the anomalous juxtaposition of verbal and visual cues expressing ethnic and religious stereotypes, in ways that make the values expressed in these stereotypes easily acceptable. Such multimodal impoliteness creatively incorporates entertainment with emotional coercion, aiming at like-minded participants in the potential presence of targets. This constitutes a form of plausibly deniable incitement, meant to instigate attitude change and intimidate the victims, which consequently blurs the conceptual distinction between jocular abuse, impoliteness and hate speech.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Internet memes, humor and discrimination
  • 3.Linguistic impoliteness
  • 4.Visual dysphemism
  • 5.Methodology
  • 6.Analysis
    • 6.1Triggering impoliteness across semiotic modes
    • 6.2Triggering ethno-religious humor across semiotic modes
    • 6.3Multimodal impoliteness, creativity and hate
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (91)
References
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed. 2020. “Mental model theory as a model for analysing visual and multimodal discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 1551: 303–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “Multimodal metaphor and (im) politeness in political cartoons: A sociocognitive approach.” Journal of Pragmatics 1851: 54–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. “Metaphorical creativity contributing to multimodal impoliteness in political cartoons.” Intercultural Pragmatics 19(1): 35–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allan, Keith, and Kait Burridge. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allan, Keith. 2019. “Taboo words and language: An overview.” In The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, ed. by Keith Allan, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al Zidjaly, Najma. 2017. “Memes as reasonably hostile laments: A discourse analysis of political dissent in Oman.” Discourse & Society 28(6): 573–594. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Luvell. 2015. “Racist humor.” Philosophy Compass 10(8): 501–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barthes, Ronald. 1977. Image – Music – Text. London: Fontana.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla. 2011. “Indeterminacy in dialogue.” Language and Dialogue 11: 21–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benatar, David. 1999. “Prejudice in jest: When racial and gender humor harms.” Public Affairs Quarterly 13(2): 191–203.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergmann, Merrie. 1986. “How many feminists does it take to make a joke? Sexist humor and what’s wrong with it.” Hypatia 1(1): 63–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boxman-Shabtai, Lillian, and Limor Shifman. 2015. “When ethnic humor goes digital.” New Media & Society 17(4): 520–539. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald. 2004. Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna. 1994. Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chiaro, Delia. 2017. “Humor and translation.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 414–429. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. “Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research 11: 35–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Impoliteness: Questions and answers.” In Aspects of Impoliteness, ed. by Denis Jamet, and Manuel Jobert, 2–15. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Impoliteness strategies.” In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone, and Jacob L. Mey, 421–446. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “Impoliteness and hate speech: Compare and contrast.” Journal of Pragmatics 1791: 4–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Michael Haugh. 2014. Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Paul Iganski, and Abe Sweiry. 2017. “Linguistic impoliteness and religiously aggravated hate crime in England and Wales.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5(1):1–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, and Lieven Vandelanott. 2017. “Internet memes as multimodal constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 28(3): 565–598. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2011. “Pragmatics and linguistic research into humor.” In The Pragmatics of Humor across Discourse Domains, ed. by Marta Dynel, 1–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “‘I has seen Image Macros!’: Advice Animals memes as visual-verbal jokes.” International Journal of Communication 101: 660–688.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021a. “COVID-19 memes going viral: On the multiple multimodal voices behind face masks.” Discourse & Society 32(2): 175–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021b. “Humour and (mock) aggression: Distinguishing cyberbullying from roasting.” Language & Communication 811: 17–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021c. “Desperately seeking intentions: Genuine and jocular insults on social media.” Journal of Pragmatics 1791: 26–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
El Refaie, Elisabeth. 2011. “The pragmatics of humor reception: Young people’s responses to a newspaper cartoon.“ Humor 24 (1): 87–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evnine, Simon. 2018. “The anonymity of a murmur: Internet (and other) memes.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 58(3): 303–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 2020. Visual and Multimodal Communication: Applying the Relevance Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles, and Billy Clark. 2014. “Can pictures have explicatures?” Linguagem em (Dis)curso 141: 451–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2010. “The YouTubification of politics, impoliteness and polarization.” In Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. by Rotimi Taiwo, 540–563. Hershey: IGI Global. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. “Moral emotions, good moral panics, social regulation, and online public shaming.” Language & Communication 841: 61–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2015. Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Derek Bousfield. 2012. “Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English.” Journal of Pragmatics 44(9): 1099–1114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Daniel Z. Kádár. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Valeria Sinkeviciute. 2019. “Offence and conflict talk.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict, ed. by Mathew Evans, Lesley Jeffries, and Jim O’Driscoll, 199–123. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickey, Leo. 1992. “Politeness apart: Why choose indirect speech acts?” Lingua e Stile 27(1): 77–87.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly, and Anna Piata. 2021. “Metaphor and mental shortcuts: The role of non-propositional effects.” Pragmatics & Cognition 28(2): 299–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeffries, Lesley. 2010. Critical Stylistics: The Power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey. 2016. “Multimodal analysis.” In Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 69–84. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey, Jeff Bezemer, and Kay O’Halloran. 2016. Introducing Multimodality. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knobel, Michele, and Colin Lankshear. 2006. “Online memes, affinities and cultural production.” In A New Literacy Sampler, ed. by Michele Knobel, and Colin Lankshear, 199–227. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd edn.). Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larkin-Galinanes, Christina. 2017. “An overview of humor theory.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 4–16. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Derek Bousfield. 2008. “Introduction: Impoliteness and power in language.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 1–16. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Sage L. Graham. 2010. “Introduction to interpersonal pragmatics.“ In Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. by Miriam A. Locher, and Sage L. Graham, 1–13. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marlow, Mikaela. 2017. “Public discourse and intergroup communication.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, ed. by Jon Nussbaum. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinec, Radan, and Andrew Salway. 2005. “A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media.” Visual Communication 4(3): 337–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinez Lirola, Maria. 2014. “Exploring visual dysphemisms in pieces of news related to immigrant minors in a Spanish newspaper.” Visual Communication 13(4): 405–427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzone, Marco. 2011. “Schemata and associative processes in pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(8): 2148–2159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milner, Ryan. 2013. “Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation, and the Occupy Wall Street movement.” International Journal of Communication 71: 2357–2390.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques. 2009. “Pragmatics, propositional and non-propositional effects: Can a theory of utterance interpretation account for emotions in verbal communication?” Social Science Information 48(3): 447–464. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nemesi, Attila. 2013. “Implicature phenomena in classical rhetoric.” Journal of Pragmatics 501: 129–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oswald, Steve, and Didier Maillat. 2018. “Deceptive puns: The pragmatics of humour in puns.” In Perspectivas sobre el significado: Desde lo biológico a lo social [Perspectives on Meaning: From the Biological to the Social], ed. by Cristián N. Padilla, 145–171. La Serena: Editorial Universidad de la Serena.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Page, Ruth, David Barton, Johann W. Unger, and Michele Zappavigna. 2014. Researching Language and Social Media: A Student Guide. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, John, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “The impact of visual racism: Visual arguments in political leaflets of Austrian and British far-right parties.” Controversia 6(2): 45–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Kate. 2020. Referring Expressions, Pragmatics, and Style: Reference and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sifianou, Maria. 2019. “Im/politeness and in/civility: A neglected relationship?” Journal of Pragmatics 1471: 49–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stöckl, Hartmut. 2020. “Multimodality and mediality in an image-centric semiosphere – A rationale.” In Visualizing Digital Discourse: Interactional, Institutional and Ideological Perspectives, ed. by Crispin Thurlow, Christa Dürscheid, and Federica Diémoz, 189–202. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svensson, Jakob. 2011. “The expressive turn of citizenship in digital late modernity.” JeDEM – eJournal of eDemocracy & Open Government 3(1): 42–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taecharungroj, Viriya, and Pitchanut Nueangjamnong. 2015. “Humour.2.0: Styles and types of humour and virality of memes on Facebook.” Journal of Creative Communications 10(3): 288–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terry, Adeline. 2020. “Euphemistic dysphemisms and dysphemistic euphemisms as means to convey irony and banter.” Language and Literature 29(1): 57–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2000. “Visual racism.” In The Semiotics of Racism: Approaches in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak, 333–350. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vásquez, Camilla. 2019. Language, Creativity and Humour Online. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walther, Joseph. 2011. “Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations.” In The SAGE Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (4th edn.), ed. by Mark Knapp, and John Dally, 443–479. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weaver, Simon. 2011. “Jokes, rhetoric and embodied racism: A rhetorical discourse analysis of the logics of racist jokes on the Internet.” Ethnicities 11(4): 413–435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. The Rhetoric of Racist Humour: US, UK and Global Race Joking. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weitz, Eric. 2017. “Online and internet humor.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. By Salvatore Attardo, 504–518. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim. 2009. Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2018. “Relevance theory and literary interpretation.” In Reading Beyond the Code: Literature and Relevance Theory, ed. By Terence Cave, and Deirdre Wilson, 185–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Jonathan Culpeper, and Elena Semino. 2021. “Shameless normalisation of impoliteness: Berlusconi’s and Trump’s press conferences.” Discourse & Society 32(3): 369–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoon, InJeong. 2016. “Why is it not just a joke? Analysis of Internet memes associated with racism and hidden ideology of colorblindness.” Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education 33(1): 92–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2019. “Multimodality in memes: A cyberpragmatic approach. In Analyzing Digital Discourse New Insights and Future Directions, ed. by Patricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 105–132. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021b. “Pragmatics of humour in memes in Spanish.” Spanish in Context 18(1): 113–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Biri, Ylva & Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen
2025. Negotiating offensive humour online. Pragmatics & Cognition 32:1 ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Pogontseva, D. V.
2024. Theoretical and Empirical Justifications for The Development of the Questionnaire “Subjective Evaluation of Lukism in Humor”. Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology 7:3 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Walther, Joseph B.
2024. The Effects of Social Approval Signals on the Production of Online Hate: A Theoretical Explication. Communication Research DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun & Weina Fan
2024. Theorizing impoliteness: a Levinasian perspective. Journal of Politeness Research 20:1 ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue