Cover not available

Article published In: Advances in the Study of Social Action in Online Interaction
Edited by Valeria Sinkeviciute
[Internet Pragmatics 7:1] 2024
► pp. 161–191

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Online public denunciation as recursive social practice

 | The University of Queensland
Published online: 3 January 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00105.hau
Abstract
Incidents of online public shaming commonly start when a record of conduct that is perceived as transgressive by either one of the parties to that interaction or a third party observer is posted, in the form of a narrative description, photograph, audio/video-recording, screenshot, and so on to an online platform, followed by viral amplification of that online public denunciation post through sharing by others within and across platforms. Building on an analysis of 26 incidents of online public denunciations of public incivilities it is argued, in this paper, that public denunciations essentially involve inviting networked audiences to denounce entextualized moments of conduct, which are recontextualized as not only morally transgressive, but as also warranting public condemnation. It is proposed that the procedure by which online public denunciations are accomplished is thus recursive, as it not only involves the ascription of action to prior conduct of the target in question that construes that prior conduct as transgressive, but the embedding of the ascription of that complainable action within a public denunciation that invites condemnation of that ascribed action. However, since social media platforms allow for the re-entextualization and subsequent recontextualization of prior posts through which public condemnation has been invited, online public denunciations are themselves inevitably open to recursive recontextualization. It is concluded that online public denunciation is thus an inherently recursive form of social practice.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Entextualization and recontextualization on social media platforms
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Entextualization and recontextualization in online public denunciations
    • 4.1Entextualizing public incivilities
    • 4.2Recontextualizing public incivilities
  • 5.Online public denunciation and recursion
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (58)
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2014a. “Moments of sharing: Entextualization and linguistic repertoires in social networking.” Journal of Pragmatics 731: 4–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014b. “Languaging when contexts collapse: Audience design in social networking.” Discourse, Context & Media 4–51: 62–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateman, John. 2017. “Triangulating transmediality: A multimodal semiotic framework relating media, modes and genres.” Discourse, Context & Media 201: 160–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Charles L. Briggs. 1990. “Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 59–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernstein, Basil. 1990. The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse: Class Codes & Control, Vol. IV. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bös, Birte, and Sonja Kleinke. 2017. “Publicness and privateness.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 83–121. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram. 2015. “Introducing quoting as a ubiquitous meta-communicative act.” In The Pragmatics of Quoting Then and Now, ed. by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz, and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 1–26. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elleström, Lars. 2010. “The modalities of media: A model for understanding intermedial relations.” In Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality, ed. by Lars Elleström, 11–50. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
franzke, alina shakti, Anja Bechmann, Michael Zimmer, and Charles M. Ess. 2020. Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2021. “Getting into the mob: A netnographic, case study approach to online public shaming.” In Analyzing Digital Discourse, ed. by Marjut Johansson, Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, and Jan Chovanec, 247–274. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022a. “Moral emotions, good moral panics, social regulation, and online public shaming.” Language & Communication 841: 61–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022b. “Karen: Stigmatized social identity and face-threat in the on/offline nexus.” Journal of Pragmatics 1881: 14–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Patricia Bou-Franch. 2019. “Introduction to analysing digital discourse: new insights and future directions.” In Analysing Digital Discourse, ed. by Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch, 3–22. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Lucía Fernández-Amaya. 2023. “The offline/online nexus and public spaces: Morality, civility, and aggression in the attribution and ratification of the Karen social identity.” In The Discursive Construction of Place in the Digital Age, ed. by Alejandro Parini, and Francisco Yus, 121–151. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2017. “‘Whose context collapse?’: Ethical clashes in the study of language and social media in context.” Applied Linguistics Review 8(2–3): 169–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giles, David, Wyke Stommel, and Trena Paulus. 2017. “The microanalysis of online data: The next stage.” Journal of Pragmatics 1151: 37–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giles, David, Wyke Stommel, Trena Paulus, Jessica Lester, and Darren Reed. 2015. “Microanalysis of online data: The methodological development of ‘digital CA’.” Discourse, Context & Media 71: 45–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Alessandro Duranti. 1992. “Rethinking context: An introduction.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 1–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut. 2017. “Quoting and retweeting as communicative practices in computer mediated discourse.” Discourse, Context & Media 201: 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Genres, media, and recontextualization practices.” Internet Pragmatics 2(1): 54–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut, Michael Haugh, and Chaoqun Xie. 2023. “Recontextualization: Modes, media and practices.” Frontiers in Communication 81, 1164897. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2022. “(Online) public denunciation, public incivilities and offence.” Language & Communication 871: 44–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Wei-Lin Melody Chang. 2015. “Troubles talk, (dis)affiliation and the participation order in Taiwanese-Chinese online discussion boards.” In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions, ed. by Marta Dynel, and Jan Chovanec, 99–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Valeria Sinkeviciute. 2019. “Offence and conflict talk.” In Handbook of Language in Conflict, ed. by Matthew Evans, Lesley Jeffries, and Jim O’Driscoll, 196–214. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan. 2019. “The coevolution of computer-mediated communication and computer-mediated discourse analysis.” In Analysing Digital Discourse, ed. by Pilar Gárces-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch, 25–67. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffman, Christian. 2017. “Log in: Introducing the pragmatics of social media.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian Hoffman, and Wolfram Bublitz, 1–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iedema, Rick. 2001. “Resemiotization.” Semiotics 1371: 23–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice.” Visual Communication 2(1): 29–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene Lerner, 13–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
John, Nicholas. 2013. “Sharing and web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword.” New Media & Society 15(2): 167–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joyce, Jack B. 2022. “Resistance in public disputes: Third-turn blocking to suspend progressivity.” Discourse Studies 24(2): 231–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joyce, Jack B., and J. Sterphone. 2022. “Challenging racism in public spaces: Practices for interventions into disputes.” Journal of Pragmatics 2011: 43–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney. 2009. “Dancing, skating and sex: Action and text in the digital age.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 6(3): 283–302.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Rosina Márquez-Reiter. 2015. “(Im)politeness and (im)morality: Insights from intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research 11(2): 239–260.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leppänen, Sirpa, Samu Kytölä, Henna Jousmäki, Saija Peuronen, and Elina Westinen. 2014. “Entextualization and resemiotization as resources for identification in social media.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Phillip Seargent, and Caroline Tagg, 112–136. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2013. “Recursion in pragmatics.” Language 89(1): 149–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marlow, Mikaela L. 2017. “Public discourse and intergroup communication.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, ed. by Jon Nussbaum. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice, and danah boyd. 2010. “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society 13(1): 114–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Negra, Diane, and Julia Leyda. 2021. “Querying ‘Karen’: The rise of the angry white woman.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 24(1): 350–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nelson, Lisa. 2018. Social Media and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul, and Mary Bucholtz. 2009. “Public transcripts: Entextualisation and linguistic representation in institutional contexts.” Text & Talk 29(5): 485–502. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfurtscheller, Daniel. 2022. “From private phones to public screens: Cross-media recontextualization of chat discourse in the case of the Austrian ÖVP corruption affair.” Frontiers in Communication 71, 1059131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Puschmann, Cornelius. 2015. “The form and function of quoting in digital media.” Discourse, Context & Media 71: 28–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “‘Hey BCC this is Australia and we speak and read English’: Monolingualism and othering in relation to linguistic diversity.” Intercultural Pragmatics 17(5): 577–603. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Phillip, Timothy Phillips, and Ryan D. King. 2010. Incivility: The Rude Stranger in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szabla, Malgorzata, and Jan Blommaert. 2020. “Does context really collapse in social media interaction?” Applied Linguistics Review 11(2): 251–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagg, Caroline, Philip Seargeant, and Amy Aisha Brown. 2017. Taking Offence on Social Media: Convivality and Communication on Facebook. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webb, Helena, Marina Jirotka, Bernd Carsten Stahl, William Housley, Adam Edwards, Matthew Williams, Rob Procter, Omer Rana, and Pete Burnap. 2017. “The ethical challenges of publishing Twitter data for research dissemination.” Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference (WebSci’17), 339–348. New York: Troy. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wesch, Michael. 2009. “YouTube and you: Experiences of self-awareness in the context collapse of the recording webcam.” Explorations in Media Ecology 8(2): 19–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Li, Bingyun & Chaoqun Xie
2026. Metapragmatics of attentiveness: a study in interpersonal and cross-cultural pragmatics. Journal of Politeness Research 22:1 ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun & Weina Fan
2024. Theorizing impoliteness: a Levinasian perspective. Journal of Politeness Research 20:1 ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue