Cover not available

Article published In: Hate Speech in Online Media
Edited by Anton Granvik, Mélanie Buchart and Hartmut Lenk
[Internet Pragmatics 6:2] 2023
► pp. 259–284

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Parody against hate speech

On how political hate speech can be fought by turning the world upside down

 | University of Massachusetts Amherst
Published online: 14 November 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00101.tri
Abstract
Political crises often lead to the violent use of digital platforms. This text aims to analyze a particular response to that vitriolic discourse on Twitter: political parody. During the institutional crisis and political battle between the government of former Peruvian President Martín Vizcarra and the Peruvian Congress between 2017 and 2019, some political actors stood out, but not for good reasons. Karina Beteta, a right-wing Peruvian parliamentarian, used Twitter to interact with people, defend her decisions and attack anyone who did not share her viewpoints. She distinguished herself by tweeting confusing and, according to some, mocking texts. These tweets received an original counter-discourse with the creation of @smartbeteta, a parody account of politics. This paper analyzes the parodic performance by focusing on the pragmatic strategies embedded in @smartbeteta’s tweets and the role adopted by this account in the communication flows.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Crisis in Peruvian politics
  • 3.Between Karina Beteta and SmartBeteta
  • 4.SmartBeteta: The parodic opinion-leader
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (41)
References
Aguirre, Carlos. 2012. “Terruco de M …: Insulto y estigma en la guerra sucia peruana [Terruco de M…: Insult and stigma in the Peruvian dirty war].” Histórica 35(1): 103–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984. Rabelais and His World, trans. by Hélène Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bossio, Juan Fernando. 2015. “Unión Civil Ya! A networked organisation for networked change.” In Sexual Rights and the Internet, ed. by Alan Finlay, 221–224. APC and HiVOS. [URL] (accessed 12 July 2022).
. 2020. “Nunca tan a tiempo: Acción colectiva y medios sociales en Latinoamérica [Never so soon: Collective action and social media in Latin America].” Conexión 141: 9–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “Transition stories: Analysis of Peruvian FTM Instagram posts.” Paper presented at the 16th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Chaves, Portugal, 23–26 June 2021. [URL] (accessed 21 July 2022).
Bossio, Juan Fernando, and Juan Esteban Bossio. 2012. “El poder de las TIC en el fortalecimiento de las capacidades: el caso de las organizaciones sociales de base en las áreas rurales de los andes peruanos [The power of ICT in reinforcing capabilities: Grassroots organizations in Peruvian Andean rural areas].” In TIC y Cambio Social: El impacto del acceso público a las computadoras e Internet en Argentina, Chile y Perú [ICTs and Social Change: The Impact of Public Access to Computers and the Internet in Argentina, Chile and Peru], 105–148. LIMA. IEP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Women against violence: Using the internet as a tool for collaboration and advocacy.” In Women’s Rights, Gender and ICTs: GISWATCH 2013, ed. by Alan Finlay, 191–194. APC and HiVOS. [URL] (accessed 12 July 2022).
Brown, Penelope, and Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burt, Jo-Marie. 2007. Political Violence and the Authoritarian State in Peru: Silencing Civil Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cabezas, Javier, Daniela Moctezuma, Alberto Fernández-Isabel, and Isaac Diego. 2021. “Detecting emotional evolution on Twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic using text analysis.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 181, 6981. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen-Almagor, Raphael. 2011. “Fighting hate and bigotry on the internet.” Policy & Internet 3(3). [URL] (accessed 12 July 2022).
De Curwen, El Diario. 2017. “Smart Beteta y la dimensión de la sátira política [Smart Beteta and the dimension of political satire].” curwen.utero.pe, 5 November 2017. [URL] (8 December 2022).
Enrique-Javier Díez-Gutiérrez, León, Oviedo María Verdeja, Salamanca José Sarrión-Andaluz, León Luis Buendía, and Madrid Julián Macías-Tovar. 2022. “Discurso político de odio de la ultraderecha desde Twitter en Iberoamérica [Political hate speech of the far right on Twitter in Latin America].” Comunicar 30(72). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escandell, M. Victoria. 1999. Introducción a la pragmática [Introduction to Pragmatics]. Madrid: Planeta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fowks, Jacqueline. 2018. Mecanismos de la posverdad [Post-Truth Mecanisms]. Lima: FCE/ CISEPA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hervik, Peter. 2019. “Ritualized opposition in Danish online practices of extremist language and thought.” International Journal of Communication 131: 3104–3121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Highfield, Tim. 2015. “Tweeted joke life spans and appropriated punch lines: Practices around topical humor on social media.” International Journal of Communication 91: 2713–2734.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “News via Voldemort: Parody accounts in topical discussions on Twitter.” New Media and Society 18(9): 2028–2045. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Amanda. 2017. “Twitter and the body parodic: Global acts of re-creation and recreation.” PhD. dissertation. [URL] (accessed 20 July 2021).
Katz, Elihu. 1957. “The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 21(1): 61–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, Elihu, and Paul F. Lazarsfeld. 1955. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kunst, Marlene, Pablo Porten-Cheé, Martin Emmer, and Christiane Eilders. 2021. “Do ‘Good Citizens’ fight hate speech online? Effects of solidarity citizenship norms on user responses to hate comments.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 18(3): 258–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Livise, Andy. 2017a. “Empieza tu colección de karinabetetadas con este post sobre sus dotes matemáticas y psicológicas [Start your collection of Karina Beteta with this post about his mathematical and psychological gifts].” Útero.Pe, 5 September 2017. [URL] (accessed 8 December 2022).
. 2017b. “Se abre un agujero negro: Finalmente Karina Beteta se enfrenta a smart beteta [A black hole opens up: Finally Karina Beteta takes on smart Beteta].” Utero.Pe, 2 November 2017. [URL] (accessed 8 December 2022).
Lovón Cueva, Marco Antonio, and Andrea Cabel Garcia. 2022. “La bandera blanquinegra y su lucha simbólica contra la corrupción en el Perú [The black-and-white flag and his simbolic fight against corruption in Peru].” Chasqui: Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación 1501: 281–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Machacuay, Michael. 2017. “En Twitter crean una cuenta versión ‘smart’ de Fujimorista Karina Beteta [A ‘smart’ version of Fujimorista Karina Beteta has been created on Twitter].” La Repúlica, 21 October 2017. [URL] (accessed 7 July 2021).
Maireder, Axel, and Julian Ausserhofer. 2014. “Political discourses on Twitter: Networking topics, objects, and people.” In Katrin Weller, Axel Bruns, Jean Burgess, Merja Mahrt, and Cornelius Puschmann (eds.), Twitter and Society, 305–318. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mendoza Michilot, María, and José Duymovich Rojas. 2021. “The use of Twitter by the prosecutors of Ecuador and Peru: Actors, links, and interaction.” 16th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 1–6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murthy, Dhiraj. 2013. Twitter: Social Communication in the Twitter Age. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nockleby, John T. 2000. “Hate speech in context: The case of verbal threats.” In Leonard Williams Levy, and Kenneth L. Karst (eds.), Encyclopedia of the American Constitution (2nd edn.), 1277–1279. New York: Macmillan Reference USA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Porten-Chee, Pablo, Marlene Kunst, and Martin Emmer. 2020. “Online civic intervention: A new form of political participation under conditions of a disruptive online discourse.” International Journal of Communication 141: 514–534.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quiroz, Alfonso W. 2013. Historia de la corrupción en el Perú [History of Corruption in Peru]. Lima: IEP; Instituto de Defensa Legal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reyes, Matías. 2020. “Trolles truchos: ex editora de The New York Times cuestiona relevancia de Twitter [Fake trolls: Former editor of The New York Times questions the relevance of Twitter].” Caretas (blog), 22 July 2020. [URL] (8 July 2022).
Stefanoni, Pablo. 2021. ¿La rebeldía se volvió de derecha? Cómo el antiprogresismo y la anticorrección política están construyendo un nuevo sentido común (y por qué la izquierda debería tomarlos en serio) [Has Rebellion Gone Right-Wing? How Anti-Progressivism and Political Anti-Correctness are Building a New Common Sense (and Why the Left Should Take them Seriously)]. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores Argentina.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tufekci, Zeynep. 2017. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Udupa, Sahana. 2021. “Nationalism in the digital age: Fun as a metapractice of extreme speech.” In Digital Hate: The Global Conjuncture of Extreme Speech, ed. by Sahana Udupa, Iginio Gagliardone, and Peter Hervik, 95–113. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Udupa, Sahana, and Matti Pohjonen. 2019. “Extreme speech and global digital cultures: Introduction.” International Journal of Communication 131: 3049–3067.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warner, William, and Julia Hirschberg. 2012. “Detecting hate speech on the World Wide Web.” In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Language in Social Media, 19–26. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. [URL] (accessed 10 July 2021).
Wilson, Jason. 2011. “Playing with politics: Political fans and Twitter faking in post-broadcast democracy.” Convergence: The Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 17(4): 445–461. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, Weiai Wayne. 2020. “Mapping connective actions in the global Alt-Right and Antifa counterpublics.” International Journal of Communication 141: 1070–1091.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue