Article published In: Hate Speech in Online Media
Edited by Anton Granvik, Mélanie Buchart and Hartmut Lenk
[Internet Pragmatics 6:2] 2023
► pp. 239–258
Semiotic excess in memes
From postdigital creativity to social violence
Published online: 17 October 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00098.wag
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00098.wag
Abstract
Since the apparition of the web 2.0, memes have emerged as a form of language that blends visual and linguistic signs in a compressed format. Memes represent a typical production of our postdigital society, insofar as they blur boundaries between the digital and the non-digital, circulate quickly and may have an influence on our society. Memes also participate in the reinterpreting and expressing complex emotions, ideas, and cultural references in a new, condensed form. The aim of this paper is to show how memes convey hateful representations, both through language and visual signs based on popular culture, thus participating in a climate of violence in public discourse. This discourse analysis is based on a case study of memes that present excessive messages, through a particular blend of linguistic and visual utterances.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Memes as complex postdigital objects
- 2.A theory of memes
- 3.Analyzing memes
- 4.Social and semiotic violence in memes
- 5.Antifeminism and anti-#BlackLivesMatter in memes: Two case studies
- 6.Conclusion: Accelerating hate speech
- Notes
References
References (35)
Barker, Tim. 2011. “Aesthetics of the error: media art, the machine, the unforeseen, and the errant.” Error: Glitch, Noise, and Jam in New Media Cultures, ed. by Mark Nunes, 42–58. New York: Continuum.
Bauckhage, Christian. 2011. “Insights into internet memes.” Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media 5(1): 42–49.
Benhabib, Seyla. 2002. The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Blais, Mélissa, and Francis Dupuis-Déri. 2012. “Masculinism and the antifeminist countermovement.” Social Movement Studies 11(1): 21–39.
Cramer, Florian. 2015. “What is ‘post-digital’?” Postdigital Aesthetics: Art, Computation and Design, ed. by David Berry, and Michael Dieter, 12–26. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Dancygier, Barbara, and Lieven Vandelanotte. 2017. “Internet memes as multimodal constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 28(3): 565–598.
Douglas, Nick. 2014. “It’s supposed to look like shit: The Internet ugly aesthetic.” Journal of Visual Culture 13(3): 314–339.
Durieux, Valérie. 2010. “Collaborative tagging et folksonomie: l’organisation du web par les internautes [Collaborative tagging and folksonomy: How internet users organise the web].” Les Cahiers du Numérique 6(1): 69–80.
Garric, Nathalie, and Valérie Capdevielle-Mougnibas. 2009. “La variation comme principe d’exploration du corpus: intérêts et limites de l’analyse lexicométrique interdisciplinaire pour l’étude du discours [Variation as a principle for corpus exploration: The benefits and limits of interdisciplinary lexicometric analysis applied to discourse studies].” Corpus 81: 105–128.
Ghliss, Yosra, François Perea, and Catherine Ruchon. 2019. “Introduction: les affordances langagières, levier d’une réflexion postdualiste du discours numérique? [Introduction: Linguistic affordances, a lever for a postdualistic take on digital discourse?].” Corela 281.
Herring, Susan. 2013. “Discourse in web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent.” Discourse 2.0.: Language and New Media, ed. by Deborah Tannen, and Anna Marie Trester, 1–26. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Isom, Deena A., Hunter M. Boehme, Deanna Cann, and Amber Wilson. 2022. “The White Right: A gendered look at the links between ‘victim’ ideology and anti-Black Lives Matter sentiments in the era of Trump.“ Critical Sociology 48(3): 475–500.
Kane, Carolyn. 2019. High-Tech Trash: Glitch, Noise, and Aesthetic Failure. Oakland: University of California Press.
Laineste, Liisi, and Piret Voolaid. 2016. “Laughing across borders: Intertextuality of internet memes.” The European Journal of Humour Research 4(4): 26–49.
Martins Ferreira, Dina Maria, and Marco Antônio Vasconcelos. 2019. “Meme discourse: (De)memetizing antifeminist ideology.” Backhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso 14(2): 46–64.
McSwiney, Jordan, Michael Vaughan, Annett Heft, and Matthias Hoffmann. 2021. “Sharing the hate? Memes and transnationality in the far right’s digital visual culture.” Information, Communication & Society 24(16): 2502–2521.
Nelson, Robin. 2000. “‘Flexi-narrative’ form and ‘a new affective order’.” Mediated Drama – Dramatized Media, ed. by Eckart Voigts-Virchow, 111–118. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
Novitskaya, Alexandra. 2017. “Patriotism, sentiment, and male hysteria: Putin’s masculinity politics and the persecution of non-heterosexual Russians.” Norma: International Journal for Masculinity Studies 12(3–4): 302–318.
Oltean, Tudor. 1993. “Series and seriality in media culture.” European Journal of Communication 8(1): 5–31.
Paveau, Marie-Anne. 2019. “La resignification: Pratiques technodiscursives de répétition subversive sur le web relationnel [Resignification: Technodiscursvie practices of subversive repetition on the relational web].” Langage et Société 167(2): 111–141.
Pelletier-Gagnon, Jérémie, and Axel Pérez Trujillo Diniz. 2021. “Colonizing Pepe : Internet memes as cyberplaces.” Space and Culture 24(1): 4–18.
Rose, Ellen. 2012. “Hyper attention and the rise of the antinarrative: Reconsidering the future of narrativity.” Narrative Works: Issues, Investigations & Interventions 2(2): 92–102.
Rosier, Laurence. 2012. “Insulte, violence verbale, argumentation : Introduction. [Insult, verbal violence, argumentation: An introduction].” Argumentation et Analyse du Discours 81. [URL]
Schlaile, Michael P., Theresa Knausberg, Matthias Mueller, and Johannes Zeman. 2018. “Viral ice buckets: A memetic perspective on the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge’s diffusion.” Cognitive Systems Research 521: 947–969.
Shifman, Limor. 2013. “Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 181: 362–377.
Wagener, Albin. 2020. “Mèmes, gifs et communication cognitive-affective sur Internet: l’émergence d’un nouveau langage humain [Memes, gifs and cognitivo-affective communication on the Internet: Towards the emergence of a new human language].” Communication 37(1).
. 2021a. “The postdigital emergence of mêmes and gifs : Meaning, discourse, and hypernarrative creativity.” Postdigital Science and Education 31: 831–850.
. 2021b. “Hyperconte. Hypernarrativité postdigitale et tectonique du glitch [Hypertale: Postdigital hypernarrativity and glitch tectonics].” Signata 121. [URL]
. 2022. Mèmologie: Théorie postdigitale des mèmes [Memology: A Postdigital Theory of Memes]. Grenoble: UGA Editions.
West, Laura. 2013. “Facebook sharing: A sociolinguistic analysis of computer-mediated storytelling.” Discourse, Context & Media 2(1): 1–13.
Wiggins, Bradley E. 2019. The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics, and Intertextuality. New York: Routledge.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Martinez Pandiani, Delfina S., Erik Tjong Kim Sang & Davide Ceolin
Al-Issawi, Juhaina Maan, Wajed Al Ahmad & Nasaybah Walid Awajan
Mihăilescu, Mihaela-Georgiana
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
