Article published In: Hate Speech in Online Media
Edited by Anton Granvik, Mélanie Buchart and Hartmut Lenk
[Internet Pragmatics 6:2] 2023
► pp. 156–172
Linguistic and discursive properties of hate speech and speech facilitating the expression of hatred
Evidence from Finnish and French online discussion boards
Published online: 18 September 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00094.maa
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00094.maa
Abstract
Examples of posts from three Finnish (236 posts) and one French (410 posts) discussion threads are analyzed with
regard to lexicon, grammar, speech acts, and topoi. The aim is to illustrate the different means used to express hatred or speech
pertaining to ideological and thematic spaces in which the expression of hatred may be legitimized. The examples represent
everyday discourse, which is an influential arena for the materialization of ideologies. Given the lack of linguistic and
discursive tools used exclusively to express or legitimize hatred, doing research on hate speech always entails taking a specific
ideological stance: neither linguistics nor pragmatics or discourse studies can provide a definition of hate speech that is valid
in all contexts. Triangulating different methodological and theoretical perspectives is necessary to produce convincing research
results.
Keywords: hate speech, expression of hatred, online discussion board, ideology
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Goals, data, and methods
- 2.Words
- 3.Grammatical phenomena
- 4.Speech acts
- 5.Discussion: From speech acts to ideology and discourse
- Note
References
References (41)
Amossy, Ruth. 2012. L’argumentation dans le discours [Argumentation in
Discourse]. Paris: Armand Colin.
Anscombre, Jean-Claude. 1995. “La théorie des topoï : sémantique ou rhétorique ? [The theory
of topoi: Semantics or rhetoric?].” Hermès, La
Revue 15(1): 185–198.
Austin, J. L. 1975. How
to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955 (2nd
edn.), ed by J. O. Urmson, and Marina Sbisà. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bernstein, Michael J. 2015. “Ingroups and
outgroups.” In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity,
and Nationalism, ed. by John Stone, Rutledge M. Dennis, Polly Rizova, Anthony D. Smith, and Xiaoshuo Hou. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Blumenthal, Peter. 2003. “Le centrage du verbe transitif [Centering the transitive
verb].” Syntaxe et
sémantique 1(4): 15–46.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language
and Symbolic Power, ed. by John Thompson, trans.
by Gino Raymond, and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Croom, Adam M. 2016. “An assessment of the negative
and positive aspects of stereotypes and the derogatory and non-derogatory uses of
slurs.” In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and
Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone, and Jacob L. Mey, 791–822. Cham: Springer.
Courtine, Jean-Jacques. 1981. “Quelques problèmes théoriques et méthodologiques en analyse du discours. À propos du discours communiste adressé
aux chrétiens [Some theoretical and methodological problems in discourse
analysis. About communist discourse addressed to
Christians].” Langages 621: 9–128.
Derrida, Jacques. 1988. Limited
Inc, ed. by Gerald Graff, trans.
by Samuel Weber, and Jeffrey Mehlman. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Fish, Stanley E. 1980. Is There a Text in This Class? The
Authority of Interpretative Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
1982. “With the compliments of the
author: Reflections on Austin and Derrida.” Critical
Inquiry 8(4): 693–721.
1994. There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech,
and It’s a Good Thing, Too. New York: Oxford University Press.
Forti, Steven. 2021. Extrema derecha 2.0. Qué es y cómo combatirla [Extreme Right 2.0:
What Is It and How to Fight against
It]. Madrid: Siglo XXI de España.
Foucault, Michel. 1972. Archaeology
of Knowledge, trans. by. A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.
Halliday, M. A. K., and Christian Matthiessen. 2004. An
Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd
edn.). London: Arnold.
Johansson, Marjut. 2017. “Everyday
opinions in news discussion forums: Public vernacular discourse.” Discourse, Context &
Media 191: 5–12.
Labov, William. 1972. “Rules
for ritual insults.” In Studies in Social
Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 120–169. New York: The Free Press.
Määttä, Simo. 2023a. “Circulation [Circulation].” In Discours de haine et de
radicalisation. Les notions clés [Discourse of Hate and Radicalization: The Key
Concepts], ed. by Nolwenn Lorenzi Bailly, and Claudine Moïse, 19–30. Lyon: ENS Éditions.
. 2023b. “Performativité [Performativity].” In Discours de haine et des
radicalisations. Un glossaire des notions [Discourse of Hate and Radicalization:
The Key Concepts], ed. by Nolwenn Lorenzi Bailly, and Claudine Moïse, 81–87. Lyon: ENS Éditions.
Määttä, Simo, and Yrjö Lauranto. 2022. “Eriävän ja myötämielisen mielipiteen esittäminen sukupuoli- ja seksuaalivähemmistöjä koskevissa
Suomi24-keskusteluissa [Expression of agreement and disagreement in
discussion threads related to gender and sexual minorities on the Suomi24 discussion
board].” Virittäjä 126(2): 205–230.
Määttä, Simo, Karita Suomalainen, and Ulla Tuomarla. 2020. “Maahanmuuttovastaisen ideologian ja ryhmäidentiteetin rakentuminen
Suomi24-keskustelussa [Constructing anti-immigration ideology and group
identity in an online conversation thread on the Suomi24 discussion
board].” Virittäjä 124(2): 190–216.
. 2021. “Everyday
discourse as a space of citizenship: The linguistic construction of in-groups and out-groups in online discussion
boards.” Citizenship
Studies 25(6): 773–790.
Määttä, Simo, and Samuel Vernet. 2023. “Reacting
to homophobia in a French online discussion: The fuzzy boundaries between heteronormativity and
homophobia.” Discourse &
Society 34(5): 617–635.
Maingueneau, Dominique. 1991. L’analyse du discours. Introduction aux études de l’archive [Discourse Analysis: Introduction to the Study of the
Archive]. Paris: Hachette.
Oliver, Sophie. 2011. “Dehumanization:
Perceiving the body as (in)human.” In Humiliation, Degradation,
Dehumanization: Human Dignity Violated, ed. by Paulus Kaufmann, Hannes Kuch, Christian Neuhäuser, and Elaine Webster, 85–97. Dordrecht: Springer.
Pascale, Celine-Marie. 2019. “The
weaponization of language: Discourses of rising right-wing authoritarianism.” Current
Sociology 67(6): 898–917.
Retta, Mattia. 2023. “Hate
words and hateful discourses on social media: Hate speech in the Italian right-wing political discourse during the Covid-19
pandemic.” Internet Pragmatics.
Revol, Thierry. 2003. “Contre nature [Against
nature].” In Dictionnaire de
l’homophobie [Dictionary of Homophobia], ed.
by Louis-Georges Tin, 108–109. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Silverstein, Michael. 1979. “Language
structure and linguistic ideology.” In The Elements: A Parasession on
Linguistic Units and Levels, ed. by Paul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks, and Carol L. Hofbauer, 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Vernet, Samuel, and Simo Määttä. 2021. “Modalités syntaxiques et argumentatives du discours homophobe en ligne: chroniques de la haine
ordinaire [Syntactic and argumentative modalities of homophobic discourse
online : Chronicles of everyday hate].” Mots – Les langages du
politique 1251: 35–51.
VISK. 2008. Ison suomen
kieliopin verkkoversio [Online Version of the Extensive Grammar of
Finnish]. Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus. [URL]
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Kulik, Maciej, Katarzyna Budzynska, He Zhang, Marie-Amélie Paquin & Barbara Konat
2025. Offensive language in reactions to public figures in polarised discourse online. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Rosen, Z. P. & Rick Dale
Römer-Pieretti, Max, Elías Said-Hung & Julio Montero-Díaz
Shalahuddin, Henri, Santi Zulfa, Sayyid Muhammad Indallah, Wafiq Nur Ilaini & Rahmat Ardi Nur Rifa Da’i
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
