Article published In: Formality and Informality in Online Performances
Edited by Sofia Rüdiger and Susanne Mühleisen
[Internet Pragmatics 5:1] 2022
► pp. 92–114
Brutal spoons and cheesy gloves
The formal, the informal and the spoof cooking show on web stage
Published online: 16 March 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00073.muh
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00073.muh
Abstract
In its long presence on television and the internet, the genre of the cooking show has changed and diversified significantly. The initial principally instructional character has given way to more entertaining sub-genres, including parodic ones, that is, ‘spoof cooking shows’ on the internet. The presentation of self (Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday.) takes on many forms in everyday life, but the possibilities of publicly managing one’s own impression have enormously increased on the largest stage in the world, the internet (cf. Shulman, David. 2017. The Presentation of Self in Contemporary Social Life. Los Angeles: Sage. ). The blurring of the Goffmanian concepts ‘front-’ and ‘backstage’ are important here in the presentation of self as ‘fake’ or ‘real’ person on the web. This article looks at the diversification of the genre of the cooking show in its transition to the internet, first by investigating strategies of formality or informality (Irvine, Judith. 1979. “Formality and informality in communicative events.” American Anthropologist 81(4): 773–790. , . 2001. “Formality and informality in communicative events.” In Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 189–207. Oxford: Blackwell.), then by exploring a particular spoof show, Cooking with Paris, as an example of how genre conventions are manifested by undermining.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Cooking with Paris
- 2.Cooking shows as genre(s): Definitions and diversifications
- 3.Formality and informality in cooking shows: Performances on backstage and/as frontstage
- 4.Spoof cooking shows on the web stage: Mimicry, parody, and the real person behind the fake person
- 4.1Exaggeration
- 4.2Contradiction and failure
- 4.3Speech acts and evaluations
- 4.4Meta-comments and subversive hints
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (27)
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2015. “Negotiating authenticities in mediatized times.” Discourse, Context & Media 81: 74–77.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics (ed. and trans. by Caryl Emerson). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bradbury, Malcolm. 1989. “An age of parody: Style in the modern arts.” In No, Not Bloomsbury: Collected Writings on British Fiction since 1945, ed. by Malcolm Bradbury, 46–57. London: Arena.
Cambridge English Dictionary Online. n.d. [URL]
Collins, Kathleen. 2009. Watching What We Eat: The Evolution of Television Cooking Shows. New York: Continuum.
Duan, Bingqing. 2019. “Genre diversification of American cooking shows.” Unpublished MA thesis, University of Bayreuth.
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday.
Heritage, Stuart. 2020. “‘Spoons are so brutal!’ Paris Hilton’s cooking show is a rare work of comic genius.” The Guardian, 20 January. [URL] (accessed 20 March 2020).
Hoëm, Ingjerd. 2001. “Theater.” In Key Terms in Language and Culture, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 244–247. Malden: Blackwell.
Hutcheon, Linda. 2000. A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms (2nd edn.). Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Irvine, Judith. 1979. “Formality and informality in communicative events.” American Anthropologist 81(4): 773–790.
. 2001. “Formality and informality in communicative events.” In Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 189–207. Oxford: Blackwell.
Johnson, Thomas. 2019. “You Suck at Cooking won’t make you hungry, but it will make you laugh.” The Washington Post, 18 March. [URL] (accessed 15 September 2020).
Ketchum, Cheri. 2005. “The essence of cooking shows: How the Food Network constructs consumer fantasies.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 29(3): 217–234.
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky. 1967. “Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, ed. by June Helm, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Lacey, Nick. 2000. Narrative and Genre: Key Concepts in Media Studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lai-Yeung, Theresa Wai, and Simon Wing Wah So. 2010. “TV as a multimedia synchronous communication for cooking and eating activities: Analysis of TV cooking shows in Hong Kong.” In ISM 2010: The IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia, 302–307. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
Marwick, Alice, and danah boyd. 2011. “To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 17(2): 139–158.
Matwick, Keri, and Kelsi Matwick. 2019. “Bloopers and backstage talk on TV cooking shows.” Text & Talk 40(1): 49–74.
Meng, Bingchun. 2011. “From Steamed Bun to Grass Mud Horse: E Gao as alternative political discourse on the Chinese internet.” Global Media and Communication 7(1): 33–51.
Mittell, Jason. 2004. Genre and Television: From Cop Shows to Cartoons in American Culture. New York: Routledge.
Mühleisen, Susanne. 2020. “Formality and informality in cooking shows: Paula Deen and the development of a genre.” In Talking about Food: The Social and the Global in Eating Communities, ed. by Sofia Rüdiger, and Susanne Mühleisen, 189–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rea, Christopher. 2013. “Spoofing (e’gao) culture on the Chinese internet.” In Humour in Chinese Life and Culture: Resistance and Control in Modern Times, ed. by Jessica Milner Davis, and Jocelyn Chey, 149–172. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
FIEDLER, Sabine
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
