Cover not available

Article published In: Formality and Informality in Online Performances
Edited by Sofia Rüdiger and Susanne Mühleisen
[Internet Pragmatics 5:1] 2022
► pp. 143–164

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Multimodal strategies for balancing formality and informality

The role of kaomoji in online comment-reply interactions

 | Old Dominion University
Published online: 17 March 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00071.kan
Abstract
This paper investigates multimodal strategies for balancing formality and informality online. The analysis of 300 comment-reply interactions on a recipe sharing site in Japan demonstrates that writers tend to avoid being overly formal or informal in their messages. For example, most comments and replies are written in polite forms but many incorporate some plain forms and colloquial expressions. Linguistic features, however, are not the only way through which the writers manage an appropriate level of formality and informality. The study examines the role of kaomoji or Japanese-style emoticons for socio-relational work online. Some kaomoji function locally as cues for interpreting the sentences featuring kaomoji. All kaomoji, including those with local functions, work to enhance the social presence of the writers on the screen via pictographic gaze and gestures, which increases the perception of intimate rapport. The findings underscore the importance of a multimodal perspective in examining how people handle social relationships online.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Linguistic and multimodal politeness and intimacy in face-to-face interaction
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.The role of kaomoji in online comment-reply interaction
    • 4.1Types of kaomoji
    • 4.2Kaomoji and linguistic politeness
    • 4.3Local and global functions of kaomoji
      • 4.3.1Functions of kaomoji in comments
      • 4.3.2Global function of kaomoji in replies
    • 4.4Non-kaomoji users’ comments and replies
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (40)
References
Al Rashdi, Fathiya. 2018. “Functions of emojis in WhatsApp interaction among Omanis.” Discourse, Context & Media 261: 117–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersen, Peter A., Laura K. Guerrero, and Susanne M. Jones. 2006. “Nonverbal behavior in intimate interactions and intimate relationships.” In The SAGE Handbook of Nonverbal Communication, ed. by Valerie Manusov, and Miles Patterson, 259–278. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baym, Nancy K. 1998. “The emergence of on-line community.” In Cybersociety 2: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and Community, ed. by Steve Jones, 35–68. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Lucien, and Bodo Winter. 2018. “Multimodal indexicality in Korean: ‘Doing deference’ and ‘performing intimacy’ through nonverbal behavior.” Journal of Politeness Research 15(1): 25–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko M. 2008. Socializing Identities through Speech Style: Learners of Japanese as a Foreign Language. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fouser, Robert, Narahiko Inoue, and Chungmin Lee. 2000. “The pragmatics of orality in English, Japanese and Korean computer-mediated communication.” In Words on the Web, ed. by Lynne Pemberton, and Simon Shurville, 52–62. Wiltshire: Cromwell Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geenan, Jarret, Sigrid Norris, and Boonyalakha Makboon. 2015. “Multimodal discourse analysis.” In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, 1037–1053. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geyer, Naomi. 2013. “Discernment and variation: The action-oriented use of Japanese addressee honorifics.” Multilingua 32(2): 155–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. “Contextualization and understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halvorsen, Andy. 2012. “Patterns of emoticon usage in ESL students’ discussion forum writing.” CALICO Journal 29(4): 694–717. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
High, Andrew C., and Scott E. Caplan. 2009. “Social anxiety and computer-mediated communication during initial interactions: Implications for the hyperpersonal perspective.” Computers in Human Behavior 251: 475–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hijirida, Kyoko, and Ho-min Sohn. 1986. “Cross-cultural patterns of honorifics and sociolinguistic sensitivity to honorific variables: Evidence from English, Japanese, and Korean.” Papers in Linguistics 19(3): 365–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 1979. “Formality and informality in communicative events.” American Anthropologist 811: 773–790. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey. 2014. “An introduction to multimodality.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (2nd edn.), ed. by Carey Jewitt, 15–30. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey, Jeff Bezemer, and Kay O’Halloran. 2016. Introducing Multimodality. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katsuno, Hirofumi, and Christine R. Yano. 2002. “Face to face: Online subjectivity in contemporary Japan.” Asian Studies Review 26(2): 205–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kavanagh, Barry. 2010. “A cross-cultural analysis of Japanese and English non-verbal online communication: The use of emoticons in weblogs.” Intercultural Communication Studies 19(3): 65–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “The use of unconventional means of communication in Japanese and American blog comments.” In Typological Studies on Languages in Thailand and Japan, ed. by Tadao Miyamoto, Naoyuki Ono, Kingkarn Thepkanjana, and Satoshi Uehara, 173–195. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobou.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther R. 1993. “Against arbitrariness: The social production of the sign as a foundational issue in critical discourse analysis.” Discourse & Society 41: 169–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. “Multimodal discourse analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by James Paul Gee and Michael Handford, 35–50. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther R., and Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinec, Radan, and Andrew Salway. 2005. “A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media.” Visual Communication 4(3): 337–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd. 2010. “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society 13(1): 114–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsuda, Paul K. 2002. “Negotiation of identity and power in a Japanese online discourse community.” Computers and Composition 191: 39–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko. 2008. “Playing with multiple voices: Emotivity and creativity in Japanese style mixture.” In Style Shifting in Japanese, ed. by Kimberly Jones, and Tsuyoshi Ono, 91–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishimura, Yukiko. 2007. “Linguistic innovations and interactional features in Japanese BBS communication.” In The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online, ed. by Brenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 163–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1987. “Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50(2): 101–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schnoebelen, Tyler J. 2012. “Emotions are relational: Positioning and the use of affective linguistic resources.” Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Short, John S., Ederyn Williams, and Bruce Christie. 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spina, Stefania. 2019. “Role of emoticons as structural markers in Twitter interactions.” Discourse Processes 56(4): 345–362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sugimoto, Taku, and James A. Levin. 2000. “Multiple literacies and multimedia: A comparison of Japanese and American uses of the Internet.” In Global Literacies and the World-Wide Web, ed. by Gail E. Hawisher, and Cynthia L. Selfe, 133–153. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Unsworth, Len. 2006. “Towards a metalanguage for multiliteracies education: Describing the meaning-making resources of language-image interaction.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique 5(1): 55–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yamada, Masanori, and Kanji Akahori. 2007. “Social presence in synchronous CMC-based language learning: How does it affect the productive performance and consciousness of learning objectives?” Computer Assisted Language Learning 20(1): 37–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yamazaki, Jane W. 2002. “Global and local in computer-mediated communication: A Japanese newsgroup.” In Exploring Japaneseness: On Japanese Enactments of Culture and Consciousness, ed. by Ray T. Donahue, 425–442. Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Ma, Shenglin, Hongjun Zeng, Huifang Liu & Han Yan
2025. Impact of online reviews in virtual communities on cross-border e-commerce platform reputation. South African Journal of Business Management 56:1 DOI logo
Tobias, Fernanda Luiza & Ana Paula Couto da Silva
2025. Proceedings of the 31st Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web (WebMedia 2025), ► pp. 521 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Zizhong & Yue Luo
2025. Visualizing support: Exploring emoji usage in online support groups through the lens of symbolic interactionism. Telematics and Informatics 98 ► pp. 102252 ff. DOI logo
Kaneyasu, Michiko
2024. Final tteyuu as a mockery stance marker: Multifunctionality and ongoing semantic change in Japanese social media. Journal of Pragmatics 221 ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Leticia-Tian & Daniel Cassany
2023. From writing to drawing: Examining visual composition in danmu-mediated textual communication. Discourse, Context & Media 53 ► pp. 100699 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Yiqiong, Susan C Herring, Rongle Tan, Qingwen Zhang & Dingxu Shi
2023. From compensation to competition: The impact of graphicons on language use in a Chinese context. Discourse & Communication 17:6 ► pp. 764 ff. DOI logo
Jeon, Hye-Jin
2022. Does the relationship between brand attitude, brand attachment and purchase intention vary based on the type of prosocial expression-based brand emoji?. Journal of Product & Brand Management 31:8 ► pp. 1180 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue