Article published In: The Pragmatics of Internet Memes
Edited by Chaoqun Xie
[Internet Pragmatics 3:2] 2020
► pp. 145–173
Internet memes we live by (and die by)
Published online: 13 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00066.xie
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00066.xie
Abstract
In the internet age, memes are at once products and driving forces of social practices. A meme contains a memetic message and a meme output, and boasts, if guided by a pragmatic way of thinking, several features, including but not limited to salience, frequency, adaptability, argumentativity, sociality, embeddedness, embodiedness, locality, relativity, emotionality and dynamicity. The current global COVID-19 pandemic serves as a fitting and timely touchstone to testify how human beings are surrounded by numerous good and evil memes in the online world, and how internet memes, as can be seen from the illustration of two specific memes, namely, the ‘stay home, stay safe’ meme and the ‘wear a mask’ meme, are impacting human life-worlds, online and offline, with their transformative power, be it constructive or destructive. Moreover, researching how memes plays a decisive part in internet-mediated interaction provides a lens of insight through which ‘deep states’ of human nature of both self and others can be uncovered and through which what Nietzsche called “a revaluation of values” is possible.
Article outline
- 1.What’s in an (internet) meme?
- 2.Internet memes are in!
- 2.1The COVID-19 pandemic
- 2.2The ‘stay home, stay safe’ meme
- 2.3The ‘wear a mask’ meme
- 3.We are in internet memes!
- 4.Concluding remarks: Internet memes we die by?
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (79)
Ask, Kristine, and Crystal Abidin. 2018. “My life is a mess: Self-deprecating relatability and collective identities in the memification of student issues.” Information, Communication & Society 21(6): 834–850.
Aunger, Robert (ed.). 2000. Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barrett, William. 1958. Irrational Man: A Study in Existential Philosophy. Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company.
Beerling, Reinier Franciscus. 1955. “Power and human nature.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 16(2): 214–222.
. 2001. “Evolution and memes: The human brain as a selective imitation device.” Cybernetics and Systems 321: 225–255.
. 2009. “Dangerous memes; or, what the Pandorans let loose.” In Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context, ed. by Steven J. Dick, and Mark L. Lupisella, 297–318. Washington, DC: NASA.
Cassirer, Ernst. 1944. An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Nature. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Chesterman, Andrew. 1997. Memes of Translation: The Spread of Ideas in Translation Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1999. The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene (revised edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Mente, Boyé Lafayette. 2008. The Chinese Mind: Understanding Traditional Chinese Beliefs and Their Influence on Contemporary Culture. Tokyo: Tuttle Publishing.
Dennett, Daniel C. 1991. Consciousness Explained. New York: Back Bay Books/Little, Brown and Company.
Dewey, John. 1922. Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Diedrichsen, Elke. 2013. “Constructions as memes – Interactional function as cultural convention beyond the words.” In Beyond Words: Content, Context, and Inference, ed. by Frank Liedtke, and Cornelia Schulze, 283–305. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Distin, Kate. 2005. The Selfish Meme: A Critical Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dynel, Marta. 2016. “‘I has seen Image Macros!’: Advice Animals memes as visual-verbal jokes.” International Journal of Communication 101: 660–688.
Feibleman, James K. 1979. “Technology and human nature.” The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 10(1): 35–41.
Hacker, Peter Michael Stephan. 2007. Human nature: The Categorial Framework. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Hahner, Leslie A. 2013. “The riot kiss: Framing memes as visual argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy 491: 151–166.
Hong, Yingming . 2003. 菜根谭 [
Tending the Roots of Wisdom
] (Chinese-English, trans. by Paul White). Beijing: New World Press.
Hume, David. 2007. A Treatise of Human Nature: A Critical Edition (21, vols. ed. by David Fate Norton, and Mary J. Norton). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hurley, Susan, and Nick Chater (eds.). 2005. Perspectives on Imitation: From Neuroscience to Social Science, vol. 11, Mechanisms of Imitation and Imitation in Animals. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Jan, Steven B. 2016. The Memetics of Music: A Neo-Darwinian View of Musical Structure and Culture. Abingdon: Routledge.
Jaworska, Sylvia. 2020. “Is the war rhetoric around Covid-19 an Anglo-American thing?” [URL] (accessed 20 April 2020).
Jenkins, Eric S. 2014. “The modes of visual rhetoric: Circulating memes as expressions.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 100(4): 442–466.
Kanai, Akane. 2016. “Sociality and classification: Reading gender, race, and class in a humorous meme.” Social Media + Society 2(4): 1–12.
Kavey, Rae-Ellen W., and Allison B. Kavey. 2021. Viral Pandemics: From Smallpox to COVID-19. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kien, Grant. 2019. Communicating with Memes: Consequences in Post-truth Civilization. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Knobel, Michele, and Colin Lankshear. 2007. “Online memes, affinities and cultural production.” In A New Literacies Sampler, ed. by Michele Knobel, and Colin Lankshear, 199–227. New York: Peter Lang.
Laland, Kevin N., and Patrick Bateson. 2001. “The mechanisms of imitation.” Cybernetics and Systems 32(1–2): 195–224.
Lu, Ying, and Jan Blommaert. 2020. “Understanding memes on Chinese social media: Biaoqing.” Chinese Language and Discourse 11(2): 226–260.
Marcus, Olivia Rose, and Merrill Singer. 2017. “Loving Ebola-chan: Internet memes in an epidemic.” Media, Culture & Society 39(3): 341–356.
Meltzoff, Andrew N., and Wolfgang Prinz (eds.). 2002. The Imitative Mind: Development, Evolution, and Brain Bases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Milner, Ryan M. 2016. The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Moody-Ramirez, Mia, and Andrew B. Church. 2019. “Analysis of Facebook meme groups used during the 2016 US presidential election.” Social Media + Society 5(1): 1–11.
Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. 1996. Human, All Too Human (trans. by R. J. Hollingdale). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2002. Beyond Good and Evil (ed. by Rolf-Peter Horstmann, and Judith Norman, and trans. by Judith Norman). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2017. ‘On the Genealogy of Morality’ and Other Writings (3rd edn., ed. by Keith Ansell-Pearson and trans. by Carol Diethe). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paton, Bernadette. 2020. “Social change and linguistic change: The language of Covid-19.” [URL] (accessed 12 April 2020).
Perez Salazar, Gabriel. 2019. “The internet meme as a digital text: Characterization and social uses in electoral processes.” Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia 12(1): 1–18.
Plato. 2000. The Republic (ed. by G. R. F. Ferrari and trans. by Tom Griffith). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rutakirwa, Tonny. 2020. Understanding Corona Virus (COVID-19): The Only Manual You Will Need. London: Tonniez Publishing Press.
Sun-tzu. 1994. The Art of War (translated, with introductions and commentary by Ralph D. Sawyer). Colorado: Westview Press.
Taecharungroj, Viriya, and Pitchanut Nueangjamnong. 2015. “Humour 2.0: Styles and types of humour and virality of memes on Facebook.” Journal of Creative Communications 10(3): 288–302.
Tay, Geniesa. 2014. “Binders full of LOLitics: Political humour, internet memes, and play in the 2012 US Presidential Election (and beyond).” The European Journal of Humour Research 2(4): 46–73.
Varis, Piia, and Jan Blommaert. 2015. “Conviviality and collectives on social media: Virality, memes, and new social structures.” Multilingual Margins 2(1):31–45.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1961. Notebooks 1914–1916 (ed. by G. H. von Wright, and G. E. M. Anscombe; trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
. 2009. Philosophical Investigations (trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte; revised fourth edition by P. M. S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte). Chichester: Blackwell Publishing.
Woods, Heather Suzanne, and Leslie A. Hahner. 2019. Make America Meme Again: The Rhetoric of the Alt-Right. New York: Peter Lang.
Xie, Chaoqun. 2007. “Controversies about politeness.” In Traditions of Controversy, ed. by Marcelo Dascal, and Han-liang Chang, 249–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Xie, Chaoqun . 2011. 礼貌与模因:语用哲学思考 [
Politeness and Memes: Philosophizing Pragmatics
]. Fuzhou: Fujian People’s Publishing House.
Xie, Chaoqun, and Ying Tong. 2019. “Constructing ‘ordinariness’: An analysis of Jack Ma’s narrative identities on Sina Weibo.” In The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Elda Weizman, 179–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Xie, Chaoqun, Ying Tong, and Francisco Yus. 2020. “Bonding across Chinese social media: The pragmatics of language play in ‘精(sang) 彩(xin) 有(bing) 趣(kuang)’ construction.” Pragmatics 30(3): 431–457.
Yus, 2019. “Multimodality in memes: A cyberpragmatic approach.” In Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, ed. by Patricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 105–131. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zimmer, Ben. 2020. “‘Virtual’: A way to be present without being there.” The Wall Street Journal, 11 April. [URL] (accessed 11 April 2020).
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Tong, Ying & Chaoqun Xie
Xie, Chaoqun & Ying Tong
Xie, Chaoqun & Ying Tong
Xie, Chaoqun
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
