Article published In: Understanding Chinese Social Media
Edited by Sumin Zhao and Chaoqun Xie
[Internet Pragmatics 4:2] 2021
► pp. 295–322
How and why people are impolite in danmu?
Published online: 15 July 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00057.wan
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00057.wan
Abstract
This study explores how and why people are impolite in danmu. Danmu refers to anonymous
comments overlaid on videos uploaded to video-sharing sites. Although there is wide recognition that impoliteness prevails in
danmu, the questions of how and why people are impolite in this context have rarely been investigated. This study
addresses this lacuna of research. Using both an analysis of comments identified as impolite by participants and an analysis of focus group
interview data, this research identified seven impoliteness strategies, covering both conventionalised formulae and implicational
impoliteness. By applying uses and gratifications theory, this study identified five uses and gratifications for performing impoliteness in
danmu: social interaction, entertainment, relaxation, expression of (usually differing) opinions and finding connections.
The dialectic of resonance and opposition that emerged from the data helped explain why impolite comments tended not to be perceived as
inappropriate in danmu. Thus, this study contributes to the emerging research on impoliteness in social media.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Impoliteness and danmu
- 3.Uses and gratifications theory and danmu
- 4.Methodology
- 5.How do people express impoliteness in danmu?
- 5.1Conventionalised impoliteness formulae
- Insults
- Negative expressives
- Threats
- Challenges
- Pointed criticisms
- 5.2Implicational impoliteness
- 5.2.1Convention-driven impoliteness strategies
- Internal mismatches
- External mismatches
- 5.2.2Form-driven impoliteness strategies
- 5.2.1Convention-driven impoliteness strategies
- 5.1Conventionalised impoliteness formulae
- 6.Why are people impolite in danmu?
- Social interaction
- Entertainment
- Relaxation
- Expression of (usually differing) opinions
- Finding connection
- 7.Discussion
- 8.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (42)
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2014. “Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics 731: 19–36.
Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chen, Gina Masullo. 2011. “Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others.” Computers in Human Behavior 27(2): 755–762.
Chen, Yue, Qin Gao, and Pei-Luen Patrick Rau. 2015. “Understanding gratifications of watching Danmaku videos – Videos with overlaid comments.” In Cross-Cultural Design Methods, Practice and Impact, ed. by Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, 153–163. Cham: Springer.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an anatomy of impoliteness.” Journal of pragmatics 25(3): 349–367.
. 2016. “Impoliteness strategies.” In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone, and Jacob L. Mey, 421–445. Cham: Springer.
Feng, Shaodan. 2018. “弹幕视频语言的四大特征 [Four main features of danmu video language].” 传媒 [Media] 6(1): 47–48.
Gan, Chunmei, and Weijun Wang. 2015. “Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of microblog and WeChat.” Journal of Systems and Information Technology 17(4): 351–363.
Hardaker, Claire. 2013. “‘Uh.… not to be nitpicky, but… the past tense of drag is dragged, not drug.’: An overview of trolling strategies.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1(1): 58–86.
. 2017. “Flaming and trolling.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 493–522. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hoffmann, Christian R. 2017. “Log in: Introducing the pragmatics of social media.” Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 1–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Johansson, Marjut. 2017. “Youtube.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 173–200. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kádár, Dániel Z., Michael Haugh, and Wei-Lin Melody Chang. 2013. “Aggression and perceived national face threats in Mainland Chinese and Taiwanese CMC discussion boards.” Multilingua 32(3): 343–372.
Khan, M. Laeeq. 2017. “Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube?” Computers in Human Behavior 661: 236–247.
Kienpointner, Manfred. 2018. “Impoliteness online: Hate speech in online interactions.” Internet Pragmatics 1(2): 329–351.
Lange, Patricia G. 2014. “Commenting on YouTube rants: Perceptions of inappropriateness or civic engagement?” Journal of pragmatics 731: 53–65.
Li, Bingyun. 2018a. “弹幕言语不礼貌研究 [Verbal impoliteness in Danmaku].” 外国语言文学 [ [Foreign Language and Literature Studies] 35(2): 145–161.
. 2018b. “弹幕言语不礼貌的情感表达功能 [Emotional expression functions of linguistic impoliteness in danmu].” 天津外国语大学学报 [Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University] 25(4): 82–94.
Liu, Lili, Ayoung Suh, and Christian Wagner. 2016. “Watching online videos interactively: the impact of media capabilities in Chinese Danmaku video sites.” Chinese Journal of Communication 9(3): 283–303.
Luo, Ying. 2016. “‘使用与满足’ 理论在弹幕视频中的体现——以 bilibili 网为例 [The reflection of ‘Uses and gratifications’ theory in danmu videos: The example of bilibili.com].” 大众文艺 [Popular Literature and Art] (15): 170–171.
Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd. 2011. “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society 13(1): 114–133.
Pan, Yuling, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2011. Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Continuum.
Qi, Xiaoxing, and Lijuan Hu. 2017. “使用与满足理论视角下的弹幕流行现象分析 [An analysis of the popularization of barrage from the perspective of use and satisfaction theory].” 采写编 [Journalism & Media Studies] (2): 137–138.
Quan-Haase, Anabel, and Alyson L. Young. 2010. “Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30(5): 350–361.
Ruggiero, Thomas E. 2000. “Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century.” Mass Communication & Society 3(1): 3–37.
Seargeant, Philip, and Caroline Tagg (eds.). 2014. The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tagg, Caroline, Philip Seargent, and Amy Aisha Brown. 2017. Taking Offence on Social Media: Conviviality and Communication on Facebook. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Terkourafi, Marina. 2015. “Conventionalization: A new agenda for im/politeness research.” Journal of Pragmatics 861: 11–18.
Wang, Jiayi. 2019. “Chinese business communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Discourse Analysis, ed. by Chris Shei, 325–338. Abingdon: Routledge.
Wang, Jiayi, and Charlotte Taylor. 2019. “The conventionalisation of mock politeness in Chinese and British online forums.” Journal of Pragmatics 1421: 270–280.
Whiting, Anita, and David Williams. 2013. “Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach.” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 16(4): 362–369.
Xie, Chaoqun, et al. 2015. 网络交际中不礼貌话语的建构模式及其语用机制 [Impoliteness in Computer-mediated Discourse: Construction Models and Pragmatic Mechanisms]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Xie, Chaoqun, and Francisco Yus. 2018. “Introducing internet pragmatics.” Internet Pragmatics 1(1): 1–12.
Xie, Mei, Ju He, and Yule Feng. 2014. “大众传播游戏理论视角下的弹幕视频研究 [A study of danmu videos from the perspective of the play theory of mass communication].” 新闻界 [Journalism and Mass Communication Monthly] (2): 37–40.
Yus, Francisco. 2017. “Contextual constraints and non-propositional effects in WhatsApp communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 1141: 66–86.
Zhang, Leticia Tian, and Daniel Cassany. 2019. “The ‘danmu’ phenomenon and media participation: Intercultural understanding and language learning through ‘The Ministry of Time’.” Comunicar: Media Education Research Journal 27(58): 19–29.
. 2021. “‘The murderer is him√’: Multimodal humor in danmu video comments.” Internet Pragmatics 4(2): 272–294.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Guo, Yadong & Yushu Luo
Ma, Baojun, Xiaoyan Wen, Yi Chen, Yao Mu & Yi Huang
Shang, Shanshan, Jilan Wu, HuiFang Qu & Qingfeng Zeng
Yang, Fan, Qing Yan & Yu Liu
Qiao, Peng
2024. On the dynamic interplay of macro and micro contexts in translation. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation / Revista Internacional de Traducción 70:1-2 ► pp. 40 ff.
Xu, Qingxin & Yi Jing
Li, Bo, Michael L. Naraine, Liang Zhao & Chenyang Li
Ni, Wenjing & Christophe Coupé
Soni, Mayank Jyotsna & Soumya Sarkar
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
