Cover not available

Article published In: Internet Pragmatics
Vol. 3:1 (2020) ► pp.34–63

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Attitudes towards elastic language in Australian online healthcare information

 | Curtin University
 | National Sun Yat-sen University
Published online: 7 April 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00051.zha
Abstract
Based on questionnaire data in response to six excerpts of Australian online health information, this study investigates university students’ attitudes towards elastic language (EL). The findings show that averaging all six cases a neutral attitude is found, with no strong preference for EL or non-EL. This indicates that it is unnecessary to deliberately use more or less EL – the key is to use EL appropriately when and where it is needed. Examining the reasons for participants’ choices, we identify ten frames. Often the same EL generated positive and negative comments: a phenomenon that can be explained in terms of two sides of a frame. The findings may help healthcare professionals to deliver medical information in ways most accessible to the public and to find effective ways of communicating uncertainty. A ‘one fits all’ rule for language use does not exist, and instead multiple standards guide our use of it.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical foundations
    • 2.1Elastic language
    • 2.2Healthcare communication
    • 2.3Frame theory
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Rationale of the research design
    • 3.2Data
      • 3.2.1Participants
      • 3.2.2Questionnaire and coding
  • 4.Findings and discussion
    • 4.1Participants’ choices
    • 4.2Participants’ reasons for their choices
      • 4.2.1Language focused frame
        • Fluidity frame
        • Informativeness frame
        • Relevance frame
        • Clarity frame
      • 4.2.2Language user focused frame
        • Trustfulness frame
        • Folk–individual frame
        • Lay–professional frame
        • Voluntary–involuntary frame
        • Indifference frame
      • 4.2.3Disease focused frame
    • 4.3General discussion
  • 5.Conclusions and implications
    • 5.1Conclusions
    • 5.2Implications
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (77)
References
Adolphs, Svenja, Sarah Atkins, and Kevin Harvey. 2007. “Caught between professional requirements and interpersonal needs: Vague language in healthcare contexts.” In Vague Language Explored, ed. by Joan Cutting, 62–78. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Babrow, Austin S., Chris R. Kasch, and Leigh A. Ford. 1998. “The many meanings of uncertainty in Illness: Toward a systematic accounting.” Health Communication 10(1): 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barry, Colleen L., Victoria L. Brescoll, and Sarah E. Gollust. 2013. “Framing childhood obesity: How individualizing the problem affects public support for prevention.” Political Psychology 34(3): 327–349. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borah, Porismita, and Xizhu Xiao. 2018. “The importance of ‘likes’: The interplay of message framing, source, and social endorsement on credibility perceptions of health information on Facebook.” Journal of Health Communication 23(4): 399–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2008. “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 31: 77–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryman, Alan. 2012. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bylund, Carma L., Carla L. Fisher, Dale Brashers, Shawna Edgerson, Emily A. Glogowski, Sherry R. Boyar, Yelena Kemel, Sara Spencer, and David Kissane. 2012. “Sources of uncertainty about daughters’ breast cancer risk that emerge during genetic counseling consultations.” Journal of Genetic Counseling 211: 292–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bylund, Carma L., Miryam Sperka, and Thomas A. D’Agostino. 2015. “Formative assessment of oncology trainees’ communication with cancer patients about internet information.” Palliative and Supportive Care 13(2): 197–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna. 1994. Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, Hyunyi, and Laura Sands. 2011. “Gain- and loss-frame sun safety messages and psychological reactance of adolescents.” Communication Research Reports 28(4): 308–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cocco, Anthony M., Rachel Zordan, David McD Taylor, Tracey J. Weiland, Stuart J. Dilley, Joyce Kant, Mahesha Dombagolla, Andreas Hendarto, Fiona Lai, and Jennie Hutton. 2018. “Dr Google in the ED: searching for online health information by adult emergency department patients.” The Medical Journal of Australia 209(8): 342–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corrales, Dalia M., Ali E. Wells, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Gabriela Pena, Alan L. Kaplan, Lorrie S. King, Sonia C. Robazetti, and Tri A. Dinh. 2018. “Internet use by gynecologic oncology patients and its relationship with anxiety.” Journal of Health Communication 23(3): 299–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creswell, John W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutting, Joan (ed.). 2007. Vague Language Explored. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Vague language in conference abstracts.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 111: 283–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “ Dingsbums und so: Beliefs about German vague language.” Journal of Pragmatics 851: 108–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, Adrian Gwyn, Glyn Elwyn, Judith Covey, Elaine Matthews, Rolsin Pill. 2001. “Presenting risk information: A review of the effects of framing and other manipulations on patient outcomes.” Journal of Health Communication 6(1): 61–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felde, Lina Klara Hoel. 2011. “The everyday elasticity of compliance in a symptomless disease.” Communication & Medicine 8(2): 123–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1976. “Frame semantics and the nature of language.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 280(1): 20–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. 1980. “Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38(6): 889–906. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Folkman, Susan, Catherine Schaefer, and Richard S. Lazarus. 1979. “Cognitive processes as mediators of stress and coping.” In Human Stress and Cognition: An Information Processing Approach, ed. by Vernon Hmilton, and David M. Warburton, 265–298. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Paul H. 1975. “Logic and conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Johnathan Culpeper. 2018. “Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory.” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, and Neal R. Norrick, 213–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven E. Clayman. 2010. “Diagnosis and treatment: Medical authority and its limits.” In Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions, ed. by John Heritage, and Steven E. Clayman, 154–169. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1984. “Modifying illocutionary force.” Journal of Pragmatics 8(3): 345–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hwang, Yoori, Hyunyi Cho, Layra Sands, and Se-Hoon Jeong. 2011. “Effects of gain- and loss-framed messages on the sun safety behavior of adolescents: The moderating role of risk perceptions.” Journal of Health Psychology 17(6): 929–940. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Sara W. Smith, and Tanja Lüdge. 2003. “Interactive aspects of vagueness in conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 35(12): 1737–1769. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, Jay. 1984. The Silent World of Doctor and Patient. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2010. “Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(11): 2889–2897. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koehly, Laura M., June A. Peters, Regina Kenen, Lindsey M. Hoskins, Anne L. Ersig, Natalia R. Kuhn, Jennifer T. Loud, and Mark H. Greene. 2009. “Characteristics of health information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers within families at risk of hereditary cancer: Implications for family health communication interventions.” American Journal of Public Health 99(12): 2203–2209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A., and Stanley Presser. 2010. “Question and questionnaire design.” In Handbook of Survey Research, ed. by Peter V. Marsden, and James D. Wright, 263–313. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lavrakas, Paul J. 2008. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Layder, Derek. 2013. Doing Excellent Small-Scale Research. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazarus, Richard S., and Folkman, Susan. 1984. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna, and Ann Weatherall. 2015. “Orientations to epistemics and deontics in treatment discussions.” Journal of Pragmatics 781: 39–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Major, Lesa H. 2009. “Break it to me harshly: The effects of intersecting news frames on lung cancer and obesity coverage.” Journal of Health Communication 14(2): 174–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. “Mental health news: How frames influence support for policy and civic engagement intentions.” Journal of Health Communication 23(1): 52–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mashiach, Roy, Guy I. Seidman, and Daniel S. Seidman. 2002. “Use of mifepristone as an example of conflicting and misleading medical information on the Internet.” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 109(4): 437–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2016. “Why we need the pragmeme, or: Speech acting and its peripeties.” In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use, ed. by Keith Allan, Alessandro Capone, and Istvan Kecskes, 133–140. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Suzanne M. 1987. “Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(2): 345–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Suzanne M., and Charles E. Mangan. 1983. “Interacting effects of information and coping style in adapting to gynecologic stress: Should the doctor tell all?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45(1): 223–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morse, Janice M. 2003. “Principles of mixed methods and multi-method research design.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, ed. by Abbas Tashakkori, and Charles Teddlie, 189–208. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moxey, Linda, and Anthony Sanford. 1993. Communicating Quantities: A Psychological Perspective. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muijs, Daniel. 2011. Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neelapala, Padmaja, Shyam S. Duvvi, G. Kumar, and Nirmal B. Kumar. 2008. “Do gynaecology outpatients use the Internet to seek health information? A questionnaire survey.” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14(2): 300–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neeley, Liz. 2014. “Risk communication social media”. In Effective Risk Communication, ed. by Joseph Árvai, and Louie Rivers III1, 143–164. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicholson-Perry, Kathryn, and May Burgess. 2003. Communication in Cancer Care. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann. 1999. Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paige, Samantha R., Janice L. Krieger, and Michael L. Stellefson. 2018. “The influence of eHealth literacy on perceived trust in online health communication channels and sources.” Journal of Health Communication 22(1): 53–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parvaresh, Vahid. 2018. “‘We are going to do a lot of things for college tuition’: Vague language in the 2016 U.S. presidential debates.” Corpus Pragmatics 2(2): 167–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patton, Michael Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peeters, Guido, and Janusz Czapiński. 1990. “Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects.” European Review of Social Psychology 1(1): 33–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pratto, Felicia, and Oliver P. John. 1991. “Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61(3): 380–391. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preacher, Kristopher J. 2001. “Calculation for the chi-square test: An interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of goodness of fit and independence [Computer software].” Available from [URL]
Prince, Ellen F., Joel Frader, and Charles Bosk. 1982. “On hedging in physician–physician discourse.” In Linguistics and the Professions, ed. by Robert J. Di Pietro, 83–97. New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rauscher, Emily A. 2017. “Investigating uncertainty in genetic counseling encounters: Managing information about genetic cancer risk.” Journal of Health Communication 22(11): 896–904. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, Alexander J., Roger D. Bartels, Jhon Wlaschin, and Peter Salovey. 2006. “The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice.” Journal of Communication 561: 202–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, Alexander J., and Peter Salovey. 1997. “Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behaviour: The role of message framing.” Psychological Bulletin 121(1): 3–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, Bethany J., and Alicia M. Ward. 2011. “Deciding what information is necessary: Do patients with advanced cancer want to know all the details?” Cancer Management and Research 31: 191–199.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruzaitė, Jūratė. 2007. Vague Language in Educational Settings: Quantifiers and Approximators in British and American English. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scullard, Paul, Clare Peacock, and Patrick Davies. 2010. “Googling children’s health: Reliability of medical advice on the internet.” Archives of Disease in Childhood 95(8): 580–582. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Lisa F., Gratz, Zandra S., and Suzanne G. Bousquet. 2009. The Art and Practice of Statistics. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. 2001. “Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A frame-based approach.” PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thon, Franziska M., and Regina Jucks. 2017. “Believing in expertise: How authors’ credentials and language use influence the credibility of online health information.” Health Communication 32(7): 828–836. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tseng, Ming-Yu, and Grace Zhang. 2020. “Perceptions of and attitudes toward elastic language in online health communication in Chinese.” Lingua 2331: 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Henst, Jean-Baptiste, Laure Carles, and Dan Sperber. 2002. “Truthfulness and relevance in telling the time.” Mind & Language 17(5): 457–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varttala, Teppo. 1999. “Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine.” English for Specific Purposes 18(2): 177–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vasilescu, Andra. 2016. “Towards a ‘theory of everything’ in human communication.” In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use, ed. by Keith Allan, Alessandro Capone, and Istvan Kecskes, 305–333. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walther, Joseph B., Jeong-woo Jang, and Ashley H. Edwards. 2018. “Evaluating health advice in a Web 2.0 environment: The impact of multiple user-generated factors on HIV advice perceptions.” Health Communication 33(1): 57–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, Ian, Arlene M. Davis, Debra B. Skinner, and Donald B. Bailey. 2007. “A place for genetic uncertainty: Parents valuing an unknown in the meaning of disease.” Social Science & Medicine 65(6): 1082–1093. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Grace. 2011. “Elasticity of vague language.” Intercultural Pragmatics 8(4): 571–599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Elastic Language: How and Why We Stretch Our Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “Vague language challenged: Australian customs encounters.” International Review of Pragmatics 12(1): 107–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue