Article published In: Internet Pragmatics
Vol. 2:2 (2019) ► pp.173–205
Self-denigration and the mixed messages of ‘ugly’ selfies in Instagram
Published online: 20 September 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00035.pag
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00035.pag
Abstract
This paper sets out a new, multimodal account (both visual and verbal analysis) of how self-denigration is conveyed through ‘ugly selfies’ as posted to the photo-sharing site Instagram. Drawing on 226 Instagram posts categorised by the poster themselves with the hashtag #uglyselfie, the visual analysis compared the persons and setting in the selfie, the person’s facial expression (eye brow position, mouth expression), eye gaze and camera angle. The verbal analysis included the self-denigration found in the image caption and the rapport enhancing or threatening responses found in the comments to the image posted by others. Ugly selfies are found to convey various types of self-denigration, including self-deprecation and self-mockery. The difference between self-deprecation and self-mockery are explained by the types of ‘mixed messages’ generated by the images. In self-deprecation, the mixed messages arise from a contrast between the visual image and the verbal caption. In self-mockery, the mixed messages arise from contrasts within the image itself, where visual exaggeration and incongruity lead to a jocular interpretation of the ugly selfie. Although the focus in this paper is on self-denigration and selfie-taking, the analysis of mixed messages can be used to analyse many different forms of politeness strategies and many kinds of images shared with increasing frequency and importance on social media sites.
Keywords: self-denigration, self-deprecation, self-mockery, selfies, humour, Instagram, ugly selfies
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Selfie-taking as a new context for self-denigration
- 1.2The subtypes of self-denigration: Self-deprecation and self-mockery
- 1.2.1Prototypical self-deprecation
- 1.2.2Self-deprecation as ‘trouble talk’
- 1.2.3Self-mockery
- 1.3Ugly selfies
- 2.Analysing Instagram ‘post events’
- 3.Methods
- 3.1Data collection
- 3.2Data analysis: Coding scheme and protocols
- 4.Results
- 4.1Persons and content
- 4.2Camera angle and filters
- 4.3Facial expression
- 4.3.1Eye gaze
- 4.3.2Eye brow position
- 4.3.3Mouth expression
- 4.4Verbal analysis of the caption
- 4.5Responses to the ‘ugly selfie’: Comments
- 5.The subtypes of self-denigration found in the Instagram post events
- 5.1Prototypical self-deprecation
- 5.2Self-deprecation as ‘Trouble talk’
- 5.3Self-deprecation reframed as self-praise
- 5.4Self-mockery
- 6.Conclusion and directions for further research
- Notes
References
References (43)
Abidin, Crystal. 2016. “Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online ? Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity.” Social Media and Society 2(2): 1–17.
Adami, Elisabetta, and Carey Jewitt. 2016. “Special issue: Social media and the visual.” Visual Communication 15(3): 263–270.
Anderson, Monica, and Jingjing Jiang. 2018. “Teens’ social media habits and experiences.” Pew Research Center. Available at: [URL] (accessed 10 January 2019).
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2013. “Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications.” International Journal of Bilingualism 19(2): 185–205.
Attardo, Salvatore, Jodi Eisterhold, Jennifer Hay, and Isabella Poggi. 2003. “Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm.” Humor 16(2): 243–260.
Balakrishnan, Janarthanan, and Mark D. Griffiths. 2018. “An exploratory study of selfitis and the development of the selfitis behavior scale.” International Journal of Mental Health Addiction 161: 722–736.
Bennett, Jessica. 2014. “With some selfies, the uglier the better.” New York Times, 21 February 2014. Available at: [URL] (accessed 26 November 2018).
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Patricia Bou-Franch, and Nuria Lorenzo-Dus. 2013. “Identity and impoliteness: The expert in the talent show Idol
.” Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 97–120.
Bolander, Brook, and Miriam Locher. 2014. “Doing sociolinguistic research on computer-mediated data: A review of four methodological issues.” Discourse, Context & Media 31: 14–26.
Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Valeria Sinkeviciute. 2017. “(Im)politeness and mixed messages”. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 323–355. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dynel, Marta. 2016. “‘I has seen Image Macros!’ Advice Animal memes as visual-verbal jokes.” International Journal of Communication 101: 660–688.
Forceville, Charles. 2005. “Visual representations of the idealized cognitive model of anger in the Asterix album La Zizanie
.” Journal of Pragmatics 37(1): 69–88.
Francesconi, Sabrina. 2011. “Multimodally expressed humour shaping Scottishness in tourist postcards.” Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change 9(1): 1–17.
Fuoli, Matteo. 2018. “A stepwise method for annotating APPRAISAL.” Functions of Language 25(2): 229–258.
Haugh, Michael. 2010. “Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(8): 2106–2119.
Holmes, Janet. 1986. “Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English.” Anthropological Linguistics 28(4): 485–508.
Hu, Yuheng, Lydia Makikonda, and Subbarao Kambhampati. 2014. “What we Instagram: A first analysis of Instagram photo content and user types.” In Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 595–598. Palo Alto: The AAAI Press.
Hymes, Dell. 1972. “Models of the interaction of language and social life.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by John Gumperz, and Dell Hymes, 35–71. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston, Inc.
Kim, Mary Shin. 2015. “The complexity and variability of self-deprecation in Korean conversation.” Pragmatics and Society 6(3): 398–420.
Kofoed, Jette, and Malene Charlotte Larsen. 2016. “A snap of intimacy: Photo-sharing practices among young people on social media.” First Monday 21(11). Available at: [URL] (accessed 20 April 2018).
Landis, J. Richard, and Gary G. Koch 1977. “The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.” Biometics 33(1): 159–174.
Maíz-arévalo, Carmen. 2013. “‘Just click “Like”’ : Computer-mediated responses to Spanish compliments.” Journal of Pragmatics 511: 47–67.
Machin, David, Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, and Tommaso Milani. 2016. “Doing critical multimodality in research on gender, language and discourse.” Gender and Language 10(3): 301–308.
Matley, David. 2018a. “‘This is NOT a #humblebrag, this is just a #brag’: The pragmatics of self-praise, hashtags and politeness in Instagram posts.” Discourse, Context & Media 221: 30–38.
. 2018b. “‘Let’s see how many of you mother fuckers unfollow me for this’: The pragmatic function of the hashtag #sorrynotsorry in non-apologetic Instagram posts.” Journal of Pragmatics 1331: 66–78.
Page, Ruth. 2019. “Group selfies and snapchat: From sociality to synthetic collectivisation.” Discourse, Context & Media 281: 79–92.
Placencia, María Elena, Amanda Lower, and Hebe Powell. 2016. “Complimenting behaviour on Facebook: Responding to compliments in American English.” Pragmatics and Society 7(3): 339–365.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schnurr, Stephanie, and Angela Chan. 2011. “When laughter is not enough. Responding to teasing and self-denigrating humour at work.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(1): 20–35.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2002. “Managing interpersonal rapport: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 529–545.
Tabacaru, Sabina, and Maarten Lemmens. 2014. “Raised eyebrows as gestural triggers in humour: The case of sarcasm and hyper-understanding.” European Journal of Humour Research 2(2): 11–31.
Tiggeman, Marika, and Mia Zaccardo. 2018. “‘Strong is the new skinny’: A content analysis of #fitspiration images on Instagram.” Journal of Health Psychology 23(8): 1003–1011.
Veum, Aslaug, and Linda Victoria Moland Undrum. 2018. “The selfie as a global discourse.” Discourse & Society 29(1): 86–103.
Walkinshaw, Ian, Nathaniel Mitchell, and Sophiaan Subhan. 2019. “Self-denigration as a relational strategy in lingua franca talk: Asian English speakers.” Journal of Pragmatics 1391: 40–51.
Wang, Ruoxu, Fan Yang, and Michel M. Haigh. 2017. “Let me take a selfie: Exploring the psychological effects of posting and viewing selfies and groupies on social media.” Telematics and Informatics 34(4): 274–283.
Yu, Changrong. 2013. “Two interactional functions of self-mockery in everyday English conversations : A multimodal analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 50(1): 1–22.
Yus, Francisco. 2018. “Identity-related issues in meme communication.” Internet Pragmatics 1(1): 113–133.
Zappavigna, Michele. 2016. “Social media photography: construing subjectivity in Instagram images.” Visual Communication 15(3): 271–292.
Cited by (17)
Cited by 17 other publications
Dahl, John Magnus R.
Liu, Ping & Linlin Yang
Triebl, Eva
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
2024. Chapter 1. Reconfiguring and repurposing authenticity. In Influencer Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 349], ► pp. 20 ff.
Imran, Hina, Saba Rehman, Sanober Khanum & Mafia Shahzadi
Mayahi, Nadia & Alireza Jalilifar
Mayahi, Nadia & Alireza Jalilifar
Mayahi, Nadia & Alireza Jalilifar
Rüdiger, Sofia
Rüdiger, Sofia & Susanne Mühleisen
Shi, Xingsong, Yujie Chang & Jiawei Gao
Tong, Ying & Chaoqun Xie
Tong, Ying & Chaoqun Xie
Virtanen, Tuija
Wang, Yilei & Dezheng (William) Feng
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021. Introduction. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
