Reply published In: Internet Pragmatics
Vol. 2:1 (2019) ► pp.50–53
Author response
Internet pragmatics and the future
A reply to Fetzer, Jucker and Page
Published online: 20 May 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00022.yus
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00022.yus
References (10)
Fetzer, Anita. 2019. “Some food for thought on the theory and practice of internet pragmatics .” Internet Pragmatics 2(1): 34–40.
Jucker, Andreas H.. 2019. “Internet pragmatics and the fuzziness of analytical categories A response to Francisco Yus.” Internet Pragmatics 2(1): 41–46.
Page, Ruth. 2019. “The future of internet pragmatics: Challenges old and new.” Internet Pragmatics 2(1): 47–50.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Yus, Francisco. 2005. “Attitudes and emotions through written text: The case of textual deformation in Internet chat rooms.” Pragmalingüística 131: 147–174.
. 2011. Cyberpragmatics. Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2015. “The role of cognition and relevance in new digital narratives.” In Prospettive multilingue e interdisciplinari nel discorso specialistico, ed. by Elena Carpi, 81–107. Pisa: Pisa University Press.
. 2016. Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021. Introduction. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.