Article published In: Interpreting
Vol. 15:2 (2013) ► pp.139–167
Bilingual working memory capacity of professional Auslan / English interpreters
Published online: 7 October 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.15.2.01wan
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.15.2.01wan
This study investigated bilingual working memory capacity (WMC) of 31 professional Auslan (Australian Sign Language)/English interpreters: 14 native signers and 17 non-native signers. Participants completed an English listening span task and then an Auslan working memory (WM) span task, each task followed by a brief interview. The native signers were similar to the non-native signers not only in English WMC, but also in Auslan WMC. There was no significant difference between WMC in English and Auslan when native and non-native signers were assessed as a single group. The study also found a moderate to strong, positive correlation between the interpreters’ English WMC and Auslan WMC, suggesting that both WM span tasks tapped into similar cognitive resources. In the interviews, interpreters said that they used multiple strategies to retain the to-be-remembered words/signs. The qualitative data also indicate that WM span tasks like these involve online retention of unrelated words/signs, whereas simultaneous interpreting requires temporary storage of meaningful and coherent concepts.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Liu, Haiwei, Shiwu Yang, Chang Liu, Shuo Liu & Ruoshui Liu
Han, Chao
2018. Mixed-methods research in interpreting studies. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 20:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Emmorey, Karen, Marcel R. Giezen, Jennifer A.F. Petrich, Erin Spurgeon & Lucinda O'Grady Farnady
Wang, Jihong
2016. The relationship between working memory capacity and simultaneous interpreting performance. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 18:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Wang, Jihong
2026. Inaccuracies and strategies related to cognitive overload in simultaneous interpreting. Translation, Cognition & Behavior
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
