Article published In: Interpreting
Vol. 14:2 (2012) ► pp.145–164
Complexities of high profile interpreting
The case of the Madrid train bomb trial
Published online: 7 September 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.14.2.02mar
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.14.2.02mar
This paper examines the experience, perceptions and narratives of the interpreters who worked at the trial of the Madrid terrorist attacks of 11th March 2004. Using semi-structured interviews as an instrument, information was sought from the members of the interpreting team regarding their role and self-image, their relationship with other professionals during the trial, their management of emotions, pressure and possible conflict, as well as the effect of a high profile case such as this on their interpreting performance. The findings show that the interpreters were generally clear and confident about their professional role and capacity, that their working conditions were inadequate, especially at the beginning of the trial, and that the experience heightened the awareness of other court professionals with regard to interpreting. The nature of the trial, the presence of national and international media, as well as the immense responsibility the interpreters assumed in this case created an atmosphere of intense emotion and pressure. However, most of the participants in this study reported that this did not affect their professional performance.
Keywords: Spain, role, court interpreting, pressure, self-image, working conditions
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Xi, Ran
Hale, Sandra, Jane Goodman-Delahunty, Natalie Martschuk & Stephen Doherty
2022. The effects of mode on interpreting performance in a simulated police interview. Translation and Interpreting Studies 17:2 ► pp. 264 ff.
Aragrande, Gaia
Hale, Sandra Beatriz, Natalie Martschuk, Uldis Ozolins & Ludmila Stern
2017. The effect of interpreting modes on witness credibility assessments. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 19:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
