Article published In: Interpreting
Vol. 14:1 (2012) ► pp.92–117
The quotative ‘he/she says’ in interpreted doctor–patient interaction
Published online: 6 April 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.14.1.05mie
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.14.1.05mie
This article examines the different functions of the quotative ‘he/she says’ in an interpreter’s renderings during four medical interviews (Dutch/Russian). First, the quotative is typically used for renderings of doctors’ turns, where it serves to signal a switch in the participation framework and to segment long discourse units by the doctor. Second, in some renderings of the patients’ turns, the quotative also has a disambiguating function, clarifying the status of the interpretation either as a literal one or as an addition to a previous summary translation. Finally, in both types of interpretation the quotative also has a distancing function. However, the situations in which this function occurs vary: in the case of doctors’ turns, distancing occurs when face-threatening or dispreferred information is being given, while in the case of patients’ turns, it serves to co-construct the typical asymmetrical doctor–patient relation.
Keywords: medical interaction, discourse analysis, asymmetry, quotative
Cited by (17)
Cited by 17 other publications
Cavents, Dries, Jelena Vranjes & July De Wilde
Xu, Han
Dutta, Rina, George Gkotsis, Sumithra U. Velupillai, Johnny Downs, Angus Roberts, Robert Stewart & Matthew Hotopf
Dayter, Daria
Jayasinghe, Lasantha, Sumithra Velupillai & Robert Stewart
Wang, Jihong
ŞENER ERKIRTAY, Olcay & Şeyda KINCAL
Jayasinghe, Lasantha, André Bittar, Rina Dutta & Robert Stewart
KINCAL, Şeyda
Mapson, Rachel
2020. Intercultural (Im)politeness. In Politeness in Professional Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 311], ► pp. 151 ff.
Watermeyer, Jennifer
Abdel Latif, Muhammad M. M.
Penn, Claire & Jennifer Watermeyer
Van De Mieroop, Dorien
Leonard Westgate, Christine, Brian Shiner, Paul Thompson & Bradley V. Watts
Cheung, Andrew K. F
2014. The use of reported speech and the perceived neutrality of court interpreters. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 16:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
