Review published In: Interpreting
Vol. 13:2 (2011) ► pp.251–257
Book review
. Self-preservation in simultaneous interpreting: Surviving the role. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2009. 182 pp. ISBN 978 90 272 2428 6
Reviewed by
Published online: 7 July 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.13.2.06hil
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.13.2.06hil
References (8)
Cronin, Michael. (2002). The Empire talks back: Orality, heteronomy and the cultural turn in interpreting studies. In F. Pöchhacker & M. Shlesinger (Eds.), The interpreting studies reader. London/New York: Routledge, 386–397.
Di Paolo, Ezequiel. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciencies 51, 429–452.
Diriker, Ebru. (2004). De-/Re-contextualizing conference interpreting: Interpreters in the ivory tower? Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lincoln, Yvonna S. & Guba, Egon G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Maturana, Humberto. (2002). Autopoiesis, structural coupling and cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 91, 5–34.
Pöchhacker, Franz. (2009). Conference interpreting: Surveying the profession. In R. Sela-Sheffy & M. Shlesinger (Eds.), Profession, identity and status: Translators and interpreters as an occupational group. Special issue of Translation and Interpreting Studies 4 (2), 172–186.
