Cover not available

Article published In: Interpreting
Vol. 27:1 (2025) ► pp.87–123

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Mirrors and windows

Gestural alignment in simultaneous interpreting

 | Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Published online: 26 November 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00114.mar
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore whether the co-speech gestures of interpreters align with those of a speaker during simultaneous interpreting. And if they do align, to investigate the functions that the aligned gestures serve and whether they provide information about the conceptual alignment of interpreters to a speaker. To achieve this, the gestures of three professional interpreters during a simulated remote simultaneous interpreting session were compared with those of the speaker using a mixed-methods approach. This consisted of qualitative micro-analyses and descriptive quantitative analyses of co-speech gestures. Gestural alignment with the speaker was found for all participants and across all functional dimensions, with representational gestures eliciting the highest percentage of alignment. The qualitative analysis of examples of aligned gestures with referential and interactive functions and of gestures used to organize the speech content metaphorically suggests that there was conceptual alignment of the interpreters with the speaker.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Mirroring others’ behaviour
  • 3.Gestural alignment in simultaneous interpreting
  • 4.The study
    • 4.1Approach, aim, and research questions
    • 4.2Participants, data collection and setting
    • 4.3Data analysis
  • 5.Results and discussion
    • 5.1Gestural alignment of the interpreters with the speaker
    • 5.2Functions of aligned gestures
    • 5.3Conceptual alignment of participants with the speaker
      • 5.3.1Pragmatic functions
      • 5.3.2Referential functions
      • 5.3.3Interactive functions
      • 5.3.4Organizing conceptual information in gesture space
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (39)
References
Alibali, M. W. & Hostetter, A. B. (2010). Mimicry and simulation in gesture comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (6), 433–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arbona, E., Seeber, K. G. & Gullberg, M. (2022). Semantically related gestures facilitate language comprehension during simultaneous interpreting. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 26 (2), 425–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). The role of semantically related gestures in the language comprehension of simultaneous interpreters in noise. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 39 (5), 584–608. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brennan, S. E. & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22 (6), 1482–1493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bressem, J. (2013). A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body — language — communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Vol. 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1079–1098. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chui, K. (2014). Mimicked gestures and the joint construction of meaning in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 701, 68–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (2021). From the finger lift to the palm-up open hand when presenting a point: A methodological exploration of forms and functions. Languages and Modalities 1 (1), 17–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A. & Iriskhanova, O. K. (2020). Patterns of multimodal behavior under cognitive load: An analysis of simultaneous interpretation from L2 to L1. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki 11, 5–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Santana, A. & Martín de León, C. (2021). Con la voz y las manos: gestos icónicos en interpretación simultánea. Hermēneus. Revista de Traducción e Interpretación 231, 225–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galhano-Rodrigues, I. (2007). Body in interpretation — nonverbal communication of speaker and interpreter and its relation to words and prosody. In P. A. Schmitt & H. Jüngst (Eds.), Translationsqualität. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 739–753.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galhano-Rodrigues, I. & Zagar Galvão, E. (2010). The importance of listening with one’s eyes: A case study of multimodality in simultaneous interpreting. In J. Díaz Cintas, A. Matamala & J. Neves (Eds.), New insights into audiovisual translation and media accessibility. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 241–253.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions: Rethinking the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hostetter, A. B. & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15 (3), 495–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janzen, T., Schaffer, B. & Leeson, L. (2023). Simultaneous interpreter’s gestures as a window on conceptual alignment. Communication presented at the 18th International Pragmatics Conference, Brussels, 9–14 July 2023.
Kendon, A. (1970). Movement coordination in social interaction. Acta Psychologica 321, 101–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M. R. Key (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication. The Hague: Mouton, 207–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopp, S. & Bergmann, K. (2013). Automatic and strategic alignment of co-verbal gestures in dialogue. In I. Wachsmuth, J. de Ruiter, S. Kopp & P. Jaecks (Eds.), Alignment in communication: Towards a new theory of communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 87–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leonteva, A. V., Cienki, A. & Agafonova, O. V. (2023). Metaphoric gestures in simultaneous interpreting. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27 (4), 820–842. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín de León, C. & Fernández Santana, A. (2021). Embodied cognition in the booth: Referential and pragmatic gestures in simultaneous interpreting. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8 (2), 277–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review 92 (3), 350–371. [URL].
(1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 1451, 47–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, R. & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science 301, 401–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oben, B. & Brône, G. (2016). Explaining interactive alignment: A multimodal and multifactorial account. Journal of Pragmatics 1041, 32–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olza, I. (2024). Gestural alignment in spoken simultaneous interpreting: A mixed-methods approach. Languages 91, 151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2), 169–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rasenberg, M., Özyürek, A. & Dingemanse, M. (2020). Alignment in multimodal interaction: An integrative framework. Cognitive Science 441, e12911. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saeed, M. A., Rodríguez González, E., Korybski, T., Davitti, E. & Braun, S. (2022). Connected yet distant: An experimental study into the visual needs of the interpreter in remote simultaneous interpreting. In: M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human–computer interaction: User experience and behavior. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 13304. Cham: Springer, 214–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sloetjes, H. & Wittenburg, P. (2008). Annotation by category — ELAN and ISO DCR. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, S. Piperidis & D. Tapias (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008, Marrakech, Morocco). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 816–820.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C. (1978). Assertion. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 315–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. & Sizemore, M. (2008). Personal and interpersonal gesture spaces: Functional contrasts in language and gesture. In A. Tyler, Y. Kim & M. Takada (Eds.), Language in the context of use: Discourse and cognitive approaches to language. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 25–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, M. & Bergen, B. K. (2014). Embodied meaning, inside and out: The coupling of gesture and mental simulation. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body — language — communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Vol. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2000–2007.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, D. & Stapleton, M. (2012). Es are good: Cognition as enacted, embodied, embedded, affective and extended. In F. Paglieri (Ed.), Consciousness in interaction: The role of the natural and social context in shaping consciousness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 89–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zagar Galvão, E. (2009). Speech and gesture in the booth: A descriptive approach to multimodality in simultaneous interpreting. In D. de Crom (Ed.), Translation and the (trans)formation of identities: Selected papers of the CETRA Research Seminar in Translation Studies 2008. [URL] (accessed 3 November 2023)
(2013). Hand gestures and speech production in the booth: Do simultaneous interpreters imitate the speaker? In C. Carapinha & I. A. Santos (Eds.), Estudos de Linguística, Vol. II. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, 115–129.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Gesture in simultaneous interpreting from English into European Portuguese: An exploratory study. PhD dissertation, University of Porto.
(2020). Gesture functions and gestural style in simultaneous interpreting. In H. Salaets & G. Brône (Eds.), Linking up with video: Perspectives on interpreting practice and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 151–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Monzó-Nebot, Esther & Vorya Dastyar
2025. A digital sociology of interpreting. Digital Translation 12:2 ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue