Cover not available

Review published In: Interpreting
Vol. 25:1 (2023) ► pp.144–151

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required
Book review

Jinhyun Cho. Intercultural communication in interpreting: Power and choices. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2022. 164 pp. ISBN 978-113-86-1061-3

Reviewed by
 | Monash University
Published online: 11 February 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00075.hla
References (12)
References
Bowe, H., Martin, K. & Manns, H. (2014). Communication across cultures: Mutual understanding in a global world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, M. & Kung, F. (2015). An essentialism perspective on intercultural processes. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 181, 91–00. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chesher, T., Slatyer, H., Doubine, V., Jaric, L. & Lazzari, R. (2003). Community-based interpreting: The interpreters’ perspective. In: L. Brunette, G. Bastin, I. Hemlin & H. Clarke (Eds.), The Critical Link 3: Interpreters in the community. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 273–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2007). Emic conceptualizations of (im)politeness and face in Japanese: Implications for the discursive negotiation of second language learner identities. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4), 657–680. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hlavac, J. & Xu, Z. (2020). Chinese–English interpreting and intercultural communication. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holliday, A. (1999). Small cultures. Applied Linguistics 20 (2), 237–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hua, Z. (2019). Exploring intercultural communication: Language in action (Second edition). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín, M. C. & Phelan, M. (2009). Interpreters and cultural mediators – different but complementary roles. Translocations: Migration and Social Change 6 (1). [URL] (accessed 27 January 2022).
Pokorn, N. & Mikolič Južnič, T. (2020). Community interpreters versus intercultural mediators: Is it really all about ethics? Translation and Interpreting Studies 15 (1), 80–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Setton, R. (2020). Review of Hlavac & Xu (2020). Interpreting 22 (2), 316–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yabuuchi, A. (2006). Hierarchy politeness: What Brown and Levinson refused to see. Intercultural Pragmatics 3 (3), 323–351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Hu, Yan
2024. Exploring the Effective Path of Cultivating College Students’ English Intercultural Communication Competence Based on the Social Network Analysis Model. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Qi, Zhongfang
2024. Optimization of cross-cultural communication model for ethnic minorities based on self-similarity and comparative learning. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Wang, Lina
2024. Innovative Research on Teaching English for Intercultural Communication Based on Intelligent Assistive Algorithm. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Wei, Xinyu
2024. A Study on the Influence of Higher Education Foreign Language Teachers’ Intercultural Communication Competence on the Dissemination of Chinese Excellent Culture. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue