Cover not available

Discussion published In: Interpreting
Vol. 24:1 (2022) ► pp.140146

References (9)
References
Basu, R. (2021). Top 15 best plagiarism detection and remover tools in 2021. [URL] (accessed 7 October 2021).
Cui, Y. & Zhao, W. (Eds.) (2015). Handbook of research on teaching methods in language translation and interpretation. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kriegeskorte, N. (2014). What lesson do rising retraction rates hold for peer review? The Conversation (9 July 2014). [URL] (accessed 18 October 2021).
Mahamud, A. A. (2021). Plagiarism checker best free tools. [URL] (accessed 7 October 2021).
Penet, J.-C. (2015). Review of Y. Cui and W. Zhao (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching methods in language translation and interpretation (IGI Global, 2015). JoSTrans: The Journal of Specialised Translation 241, 262–264.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plagiarism.org (2017). What is plagiarism? [URL] (accessed 23 June 2021).
Van Noorden, R. (2011). Science publishing: The trouble with retractions. Nature 4781, 26–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Cui, Ying & Xiao Liu
2023. A Questionnaire Survey on Chinese Translation and Interpreting Scholars’ Publication Pressure and Its Impact on Research Quality and Publishing Ethics. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 18:3  pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Hu, Bei
2022. Trust to thrive. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 24:2  pp. 309 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue