Cover not available

Article published In: Interpreting
Vol. 21:1 (2019) ► pp.36–61

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Accuracy in telephone interpreting and on-site interpreting

A comparative study

 | The University of Queensland
 | Macquarie University
Published online: 13 March 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00019.wan
Abstract
Although telephone interpreting is widely used in many countries, very little is known about the quality of telephone interpreting performance in social service settings. This paper reports on the findings of an exploratory study investigating the quality of a professional Mandarin/English interpreter’s consecutive interpreting performance in one on-site interpreting task and two telephone interpreting tasks. All three tasks are simulations of authentic situations. This article has two aims. The primary aim is to compare the accuracy of the interpreting performance in on-site and telephone interpreting by using a meaning unit-based quality assessment framework. The secondary aim is to use a Conversation-Analysis-based micro-analytical approach to explore the nature of accurate interpretations (e.g. strategic additions, strategic omissions) and problematic interpretations (e.g. unjustifiable omissions, unjustifiable distortions), especially examining the motivations for these interpretations, the extent to which they are indicative of interpreting difficulties, and their impact on the triadic communication. A key finding is that the interpreter’s performance was highly accurate in all three interpreting tasks. The micro-analytical approach has served to identify possible reasons for the interpreter’s accurate and inaccurate interpretations.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Empirical research on telephone interpreting
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Research design and procedure
    • 3.2Data analysis
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Quantitative results
    • 4.2Qualitative results
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (30)
References
Baraldi, C. (2012). Interpreting as dialogic mediation: The relevance of expansions. In C. Baraldi & L. Gavioli (Eds.), Coordinating participation in dialogue interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 297–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baraldi, C. & Gavioli, L. (Eds.) (2012). Coordinating participation in dialogue interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Remote interpreting. In F. Pöchhacker (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies. London/New York: Routledge, 346–348.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). What a micro-analytical investigation of additions and expansions in remote interpreting can tell us about interpreter’s participation in a shared virtual space. Journal of Pragmatics 1071, 165–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Q. (2015). Examining the challenges for telephone interpreters in New Zealand. MA thesis, Auckland University of Technology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cunningham, H., Cushman, L. F., Akuete-Penn, C. & Meyer, D. D. (2008). Satisfaction with telephonic interpreters in pediatric care. Journal of the National Medical Association 100 (4), 429–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gracia-García, R. A. (2002). Telephone interpreting: A review of pros and cons. In B. Scott (Ed.), Proceedings of the 43rd annual conference. Alexandria: American Translators Association, 195–216.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobsen, B. (2002). Pragmatic meaning in court interpreting: An empirical study in consecutively interpreted question-answer dialogues. PhD dissertation, The Aarhus School of Business.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, N. (2008). Telephone interpreting. A comprehensive guide to the profession. Bloomington: Trafford Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, N. & Pöchhacker, F. (2015). Telephone interpreting. In F. Pöchhacker (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies. London/New York: Routledge, 412–415.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kohn, K. & Kalina, S. (1996). The strategic dimension of interpreting. Meta 41 (1), 118–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locatis, C., Williamson, D., Gould-Kabler, C., Zone-Smith, L., Detzler, I., Roberson, J., Maisiak, R. & Ackerman, M. (2010). Comparing in-person, video, and telephonic medical interpretation. Journal of General Internal Medicine 25 (4), 345–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Major, G. & Napier, J. (2012). Interpreting and knowledge mediation in the healthcare setting: What do we really mean by ‘accuracy’? Linguistica Antverpiensia 111, 207–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mason, I. & Stewart, M. (2001). Interactional pragmatics, face and the dialogue interpreter. In I. Mason (Ed.), Triadic exchanges: Studies in dialogue interpreting. Manchester: St Jerome, 51–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mikkelson, H. (2003). Telephone interpreting: Boon or bane? In L. P. González (Ed.), Speaking in tongues: Language across contexts and users. Valencia: Universitat de València, 251–269.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Evolving views of the court interpreter’s role: Between Scylla and Chrybdis. In C. Valero Garcés & A. Martin (Eds.), Crossing borders in community interpreting: Definitions and dilemmas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 81–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pointon, T. (1996). Telephone interpreting service is available (Letter). British Medical Journal 3121, 53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Price, E. L., Pérez-Stable, E. J., Nickleach, D., López, M. & Karliner, L. S. (2012). Interpreter perspectives of in-person, telephonic, and videoconferencing medical interpreting in clinical encounters. Patient Education and Counseling 871, 226–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenberg, B. A. (2007). A data driven analysis of telephone interpreting. In C. Wadensjö, B. E. Dimitrova & A.-L. Nilsson (Eds.), The Critical Link 4: Professionalisation of interpreting in the community. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 65–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wadensjö, C. (1998). Interpreting as interaction. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Telephone interpreting and the synchronisation of talk in social interaction. The Translator 5 (2), 247–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, J. (2018a). ‘I only interpret the content and ask practical questions when necessary.’ Interpreters’ perceptions of their explicit coordination and personal pronoun choice in telephone interpreting. Perspectives. (online first). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018c). ‘Telephone interpreting should be used only as a last resort.’ Interpreters’ perceptions of the suitability, remuneration and quality of telephone interpreting. Perspectives 26 (1), 100–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, J. (2009). The use of discourse markers in spoken Chinese of urban teenagers (in Chinese). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Huang, Yujie, Andrew K F Cheung, Kanglong Liu & Han Xu
2025. Can sentiment analysis help to assess accuracy in interpreting? A corpus-assisted computational linguistic approach. Applied Linguistics DOI logo
Wang, Jihong
2025. Strategic additions in simultaneous interpreting from a signed language into a spoken language. Translation and Interpreting Studies 20:1 ► pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Farag, Rahaf & Bernd Meyer
2024. Coordination in telephone-based remote interpreting. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 26:1 ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Gieshoff, Anne Catherine & Michaela Albl-Mikasa
2024. Interpreting accuracy revisited: a refined approach to interpreting performance analysis. Perspectives 32:2 ► pp. 210 ff. DOI logo
Koponen, Linnea, Mikaela Magnusson & Emelie Ernberg
2024. Swedish interpreters' views and experiences of interpreting child forensic interviews. Child Abuse & Neglect 149 ► pp. 106605 ff. DOI logo
Cho, Jinhyun
2023. Interpreters as Translation Machines: Telephone Interpreting Challenges as Awareness Problems. Qualitative Health Research 33:12 ► pp. 1037 ff. DOI logo
Lu, Rong, Muhammad Alif Redzuan Abdullah & Lay Hoon Ang
2023. Into-A or Into-B, That is a Question: A Systematic Literature Review of Directionality and Performance in Consecutive Interpreting. Sage Open 13:4 DOI logo
Jaiteh, Maïmouna, Clément Cormi, Louise Hannetel, Jean-Paul Mir, Edouard Leaune, Stéphane Sanchez & Barbara Schouten
2022. Perception of the use of a telephone interpreting service during primary care consultations: A qualitative study with allophone migrants. PLOS ONE 17:3 ► pp. e0264832 ff. DOI logo
Amuzu, Evershed K., Akua Campbell & Seth Ofori
2020. “That’s not my understanding”. Language and Dialogue 10:3 ► pp. 389 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue