In:Language Contact in the Territory of the Former Soviet Union
Edited by Diana Forker and Lenore A. Grenoble
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 50] 2021
► pp. v–vi
Get fulltext
This article is available free of charge.
Published online: 18 June 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.50.toc
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.50.toc
Table of contents
Introduction1
Diana Forker
Lenore Grenoble
Nominal borrowings in Tsova-Tush (Nakh-Daghestanian, Georgia) and their
gender assignment15
Jesse Wichers Schreur
Lexical convergence reflects complex historical processes: A case study of two borderline regions of Russia35
Ilia Yu. Chechuro
The ideological background of language change in Permic-speaking
communities59
Svetlana Edygarova
Enets-Russian language contact85
Olesya Khanina
Izhma Komi in Western Siberia: At the crossroads of language contact119
Egor Kashkin
Nikita Muravyev
From head-final towards head-initial grammar: Generational and areal differences concerning word order usage and
judgement among Udmurt speakers143
Erika Asztalos
Russian influence on Surgut Khanty and Estonian aspect is limited but
similar183
Katalin Gugán
Anne Tamm
Quotative indexes in Permic: Between the original strategies and Russian217
Denys Teptiuk
Some structural similarities in the outcomes of language contact with
Russian259
Diana Forker
Lenore Grenoble
Why do two Uralic languages (Surgut Khanty and Erzya) use different
code-switching strategies?289
Boglárka Janurik
Zsófia Schön
Analyzing Modern Chinese Pidgin Russian: Variability and the Feature pool theory315
Elena Perekhvalskaya
The choice of forms in contact varieties: Linguistic vs. social motivation (on the base of language contact in the
Russian-Chinese border area)345
Kapitolina Fedorova
Language data and maps369
Yuri Koryakov
Languages & language families381
Subject index
