Cover not available

In:Language Contact in the Territory of the Former Soviet Union
Edited by Diana Forker and Lenore A. Grenoble
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 50] 2021
► pp. 369–380

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Language data and maps

 | Russian Academy of Sciences
Published online: 18 June 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.50.13kor
Abstract
The maps and data in this chapter give an overall picture of the demographics and social status of the languages discussed in the present volume. In the 1st table, each language mentioned in the book is provided with basic genealogical, sociolinguistic and demographic data. The more complicated cases are detailed in the followed sections. Three maps show the distribution of the same languages and their ranking according to the following parameters: (1) number of speakers; (2) genealogical classification; (3) levels of endangerment and official status.
Article outline
  • List of languages
  • Language vs. dialect
  • Genealogical classification
  • Speaker numbers
  • Sociolinguistic status
  • Official status
  • Writing
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (25)
References
Agranat, T. B. (2018). Votic. UNESCO survey of world languages.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bežtinskij jazyk [The Bezhta language]. (2020, August 13). Malye jazyki Rossii [Minor languages of Russia]. Retrieved from [URL]
Blokland, R., & Rießler, M. (2011). Komi-Saami-Russian contacts on the Kola peninsula. In C. Hasselblatt, P. Houtzagers, & R. van Pareren (Eds.), Language contact in times of globalization (pp. 5–26). Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Census (2010). Itogi Vserossijskoj perepisi naselenija. 2010. Tablica 6: Naselenie Rossijskoj Federacii po vladeniju jazykami [Results of the all-Russian population census. 2010. Table 6: Population of the Russian federation by languages]. Retrieved from [URL]
Clarkson, J., & Iurkova, E. (2015). Important factors in the development of an orthography: Shin-Shorsu Rutul – A case study. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Csató, É. Á. (2001). Syntactic code-copying in Karaim. In Ö. Dahl & M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm (Eds.), The Circum-Baltic languages (pp. 271–283). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Čulymsko-tjurkskij jazyk [The Chulym Turkic language]. (2020, September 16). Malye jazyki Rossii [Minor languages of Russia]. Retrieved from [URL]
Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (Eds.). (2020). Ethnologue: Languages of the world. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernštreits, V. (2011). Lībiešu valodas situācija [The situation of the Liv language]. Retrieved from [URL][URL]
Gruzdeva, E. (2019). Nivkh. UNESCO survey of world languages.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kazakevič, O. A. (2003). Jugskij jazyk [The Yugh language]. In V. J. Mixalʹčenko (Ed.), Pisʹmennye jazyki mira: Jazyki Rossijskoj Federacii. Sociolingvističeskaja Ènciklopedija. Kniga. [The written languages of the world: Languages of the Russian federation. Sociolinguistic encyclopedia. Book 2] (pp. 732–738). Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Dolgan. UNESCO survey of world languages.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ketskij jazyk [The Ket language]. (2020, August 13). Malye jazyki Rossii [Minor languages of Russia]. Retrieved from [URL]
Khanina, O., Koryakov, Y., & Shluinsky, A. (2018). Enets in space and time: A case study in linguistic geography. Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen, 42, 1–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koivisto, V. (2018). Border Karelian dialects: A diffuse variety of Karelian. In M. Palander, H. Riionheimo, & V. Koivisto (Eds.), On the border of language and dialect (pp. 56–84). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krauss, M. E. (2007). Native languages of Alaska. In O. Miyaoko, O. Sakiyama, & M. E. Krauss (Eds), The vanishing voices of the Pacific Rim (pp. 406–418). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, M. P., & Simons, G. F. (2010). Assessing endangerment: Expanding Fishman’s GIDS. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 55(2), 103–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ono, C. (2019). Itelmen. UNESCO survey of world languages.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oskolskaya, S. A., & Stoynova, N. M. (2019). Nanai. UNESCO survey of world languages.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ovsepjan, L. S. (2013). Vostočnoarmjanskij literaturnyj jazyk [Standard Eastern Armenian]. In J. B. Korjakov & A. A. Kibrik (Eds.), Jazyki mira: Reliktovye indoevropejskie jazyki Perednej i Centralʹnoj Azii [Languages of the world: Relict Indo-European languages of Western and Central Asia] (pp. 242–291). Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perexvalʹskaja, E. V. (2016). Udègejskij jazyk [The Udige language]. In V. J. Mixalʹčenko (Ed.), Jazyk i obščestvo. Ènciklopedija [Language and society. Encyclopedia] (pp. 506–513). Moscow: Azbukovnik.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prokopʹjeva, P. E. (2019). Kolyma Yukaghir. UNESCO survey of world languages.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sammallahti, P. (1998). The Saami languages: An introduction. Kárášjohka: Davvi Girji OS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sjurjun, A. A. (2019). Tofalar. UNESCO survey of world languages.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
UNESCO (2003). Language vitality and endangerment. [URL]
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue