Cover not available

In:Talking about Food: The social and the global in eating communities
Edited by Sofia Rüdiger and Susanne Mühleisen
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 47] 2020
► pp. 35–56

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 3
The moral taste of food

A discourse analysis of social media discussions about vegetarianism and veganism

 | University of Bayreuth
Published online: 18 June 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.47.03dre
Abstract
This paper analyses discussions about vegetarianism and veganism in francophone social media groups where moral statements play an important role. It sketches a communicative conception of morality as ‘doing ethics’ that zooms in on how morality emerges and is negotiated in interaction by concentrating on linguistic practices that key morality. Based on two case studies, it examines controversies about moral values of food which offer insights in the more general machinery of moral discourse. The data reveal different linguistic techniques which are frequent in, although not specific to, moral discourse. In particular, these are evaluations, pejorative or upgrading lexicon, deontic modality, generalisations, typical speech acts like advice or instruction as well as semantic and structural forms of intensification.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Vegetarianism and veganism
  • 3.Doing ethics
  • 4.Data
    • 4.1Data collection
    • 4.2Contextualization of the social media discussions
  • 5.Two case studies: Honey and French fries
    • 5.1Is honey health food?
    • 5.2Are French fries junk food?
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
References (23)
References
Bergmann, J. 2004. Moralisierung und Moralisierungsdistanz. Über einige Gefahren der moralischen Kommunikation in der modernen Gesellschaft. In Moral als Gift oder Gabe? Zur Ambivalenz von Moral und Religion [Interpretation Interdisziplinär 1], B. Boothe & P. Stoellger (eds), 24–44. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergmann, J. & Luckmann, T. 1999. Moral und Kommunikation. In Struktur und Dynamik der Formen moralischer Kommunikation [Kommunikative Konstruktion von Moral 1], J. Bergmann & T. Luckmann (eds), 13–36. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Das, V. 2012. Ordinary ethics. In A Companion to Moral Anthropology [Blackwell Companions to Anthropology 20], D. Fassin (ed.), 133–149. Malden MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drescher, M. 2000. La réduplication: Formes et fonctions. In Diskursanalyse. Untersuchungen zum gesprochenen Französisch. Akten der gleichnamigen Sektion des 1. Kongresses des Franko-Romanisten-Verbands, B. Wehr & H. Thomaßen (eds), 57–74. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Sprachliche Affektivität: Darstellung emotionaler Beteiligung am Beispiel von Gesprächen aus dem Französischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Contextualizing local knowledge: Reformulations in HIV/AIDS prevention in Burkina Faso. In Language and HIV/AIDS [Critical Language and Literacy Studies 5], C. Higgins & B. Norton (eds), 197–213. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farge, S. 2019. Le discours végétal des chefs: Vers une nouvelle légitimité? In La gastronomie à l’ère numérique. Regards linguistiques et économiques sur l’Allemagne, la France et l’Italie [Stauffenburg Romanistik 3], J. Cadeddu, M. Kauffer & Y. Keromnes (eds), 243–260. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fassin, D. 2012. Introduction: Toward a critical moral anthropology. In A Companion to Moral Anthropology [Blackwell Companions to Anthropology 20], D. Fassin (ed.), 1–17. Malden MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischler, C. 1990/2001. L’Homnivore. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. Alimentation morale et société. In Identités des mangeurs. Images des aliment, I. Giachetti (ed.), 31–54. Paris: Polytechnica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Food Porn. n.d. Wikipedia, <[URL]> (22 October 2019).
Günthner, S. 2000. Vorwurfsaktivitäten in der Alltagsinteraktion. Grammatische, prosodische, rhetorisch-stilistische und interaktive Verfahren bei der Konstitution kommunikativer Muster und Gattungen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keppler, A. & Luckmann, T. 1991. ‘Teaching’: Conversational transmission of knowledge. In Asymmetries in Dialogue, I. Marková & K. Foppa (eds), 143–165. New York NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf/Barnes & Noble Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambek, M. 2015. The Ethical Condition. Essays on Action, Person & Value. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lardellier, P. 2014. Cuisiner, manger, et en parler… Le Discours et la Langue 6(2): 7–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. 2008. Soziologie der Moral. In Die Moral der Gesellschaft [Suhrkamp-Taschenbuch 1871], N. Luhmann (ed.), 56–162. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mariscal, V. & Aucuit, N. 2014. Du mangeur vertueux au ‚locavore’. Un panorama des discours prescriptifs sur les pratiques alimentaires du XIVème au XXIème siècle. Le Discours et la Langue 6(2): 49–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ouédraogo, A. 2005. Crise sociale, crise du goût: Le végétarisme comme issue. Une étude de cas en région parisienne. INRA Sciences Sociales 3: 1–4.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paveau, M.-A. 2013. Langage et morale: Une éthique des vertus discursives. Limoges: Éditions Lambert-Lucas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riepl, W. 2013. Verbreitung des Vegetarismus in ausgewählten Ländern. Statistik Dresden, 26 September 2013. <[URL]> (4 April 2018).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, J. 2011. The ordinary ethics of everyday talk. In Ordinary Ethics, Anthropology, Language, and Action, M. Lambek (ed.), 123–139. New York NY: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Bennett, J. 2018. Moral Talk: Stance and Evaluation in Political Discourse. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traïni, C. 2012. Entre dégoût et indignation morale, sociogenèse d’une pratique militante. Revue Française de Science Politique 62: 559–581. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Drescher, Martina, Oumarou Boukari & Liliane Carline Ngawa Mbaho
2023. So Much Fear and Questioning: A Comparative Study of Discourses on Covid-19 in Côte d’Ivoire and Cameroon. In Covid-19 in Africa: Societal and Economic Implications [African Histories and Modernities, ], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Genre in World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G67], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue