Cover not available

In:The Sociolinguistics of Place and Belonging: Perspectives from the margins
Edited by Leonie Cornips and Vincent A. de Rooij
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 45] 2018
► pp. 89–112

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 5
Us, them and all the others

Analyzing belonging among Japanese immigrant women in The Netherlands

 | Victoria University of Wellington
Published online: 7 March 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.45.05ban
Abstract
This study examines the linguistic practices of a group of Japanese immigrant women temporarily living in Amstelveen, and their ways of constructing belonging. Taking as an example three linguistic variables: (i) personal pronouns ‘I’ and ‘we’; (ii) specific ethnic labels (single self-referring label Nihonjin ‘The Japanese’ versus multiple labels Orandajin, Oranda no hito/hitotachi, Orandajin no hito/hitotachi, Oranda ‘The Dutch’); and (iii) the use of non-standard Osaka Japanese negation I discuss how speakers in this group (re)create various boundaries, and how they draw on ‘us’ versus ‘them’ dichotomy as a way of achieving group cohesion.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Constructing belonging
  • Ethnographic background
    • ‘Japan on the Amstel’
    • The Club
    • Participants
  • Data and methods
  • Language resources as means for indexing belonging
    • Personal pronouns: From ‘I’ to ‘we’
    • Ethnic labels
    • The use of standard and non-standard negation
  • Discussion and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (17)
References
Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antonsisch, M. 2010. Searching for belonging – An analytical framework. Geography Compass 4: 644–659. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barth, F. 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2007. On scope and depth in linguistic ethnography. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(5): 682–688. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Fina, A. 2000. Orientation in immigrant narratives: The role of ethnicity in the identification of characters. Discourse Studies 2:131–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duranti, A. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geschiere, P. 2009. The Perils of Belonging: Autochtony, Citizenship and Exclusion in Africa & Europe. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giles, H., Bourhis R. Y. & Taylor D. M. 1977. Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations, H. Giles (ed.), 307–348. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumoto, K. & Britain, D. (2003). Contact and obsolescence in a diaspora variety of Japanese: The case of Palau in Micronesia. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 44: 38–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meinhoff, U. & Galasinski D. 2000. The Language of Belonging. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, E. 1992. Indexing gender. In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (eds), 335–358. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Onoe, K. 1999. Osaka kotoba gaku. Tokyo: Sogensha.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. 1990. The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strycharz-Banaś, A. 2016. In-group marker going out: Meaning making in a community of practice. Language in Society 45(5): 665–684. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (eds), 33–47. Monterey CA: Brooks & Cole.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, R. 1999. Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32: 185–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, N. 2006. Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice 40(3): 197–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Ilbury, Christian
2022. A tale of two cities: The discursive construction of ‘place’ in gentrifying East London. Language in Society 51:3 ► pp. 511 ff. DOI logo
Jaspers, Jürgen
2018. The boundaries of belonging. In The Sociolinguistics of Place and Belonging [IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 45], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue