Cover not available

In:Endangered Languages and Languages in Danger: Issues of documentation, policy, and language rights
Edited by Luna Filipović and Martin Pütz
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 42] 2016
► pp. 25–43

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF

North-South relations in linguistic science

Collaboration or colonialism?

 | University of Lyon 2
ORCiD logo with link | Hunan University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 3 October 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.42.02gri
In this chapter, we attempt to unmask the ideological bias inherent in influential conceptions of the methods, motivations and practices of endangered language documentation research (ELDR) by addressing the unequal exchange that frequently characterizes the relationship between the linguistic researcher, on the one hand, and the language community and, in some cases, local researchers, on the other. We highlight the extent to which common answers to the question “Why document endangered languages?” suppress the sociocultural and historical relations within which ELDR practices are situated. We review the historical evolution of the conceptualization of language documentation research, and its relationship to language preservation and revitalization. We ask what it is that makes ELDR scientific, critically analysing the models of “language” and of “science” that are frequently deployed in arguments for its importance, and question the value-neutrality of the notion “scientific community” in this context. We suggest that the conjunction of dominant concepts of “language” and “data”, and the relations between “international” and “local” ELD researchers, generates an ideological construction of unequal competence that operates to justify unequal North-South exchange relations. We document this claim of unequal and at times abusive North-South exchange with brief, anonymized case studies. We conclude by noting that, in comparison with other social science disciplines, linguistics seems resistant to reflexive and self-critical analysis of its ideological dimension; and suggesting possible ways of raising awareness and generalizing models of good practice.
References (33)
References
Anderson, B. 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, P. & Sallabank, J. (eds). 2010. The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages, 45–65. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brenzinger, B. (ed.). 2006. Endangered Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 2010. The forms of capital. In Cultural Theory: An Anthology, I. Szeman & T. Kaposy (eds), 81–93. New York NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, B. & Richardson, K. 1992. Introduction. In Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method, 1–28. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chandler, M.J., Lalonde, C., Sokol, B., Hallett, D. & Marcia, J. 2003. Personal persistence, identity development, and suicide: A study of native and non-native North American adolescents. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 68(2): i–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clifford, J. & Marcus, G.E. 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cole, M., Gay, J., Glick, J. & Sharp, D. 1971. The Cultural Context of Learning and Thinking: An Exploration in Experimental Anthropology. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Craig, C. 1992. Miss Nora, rescuer of the Rama language: A story of power and empowerment. In Locating Power, Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, K. Hall, M. Bucholtz & B. Moonwomon (eds), 80–89. Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. Commentary on: Ethics, advocacy and empowerment: Issues in methods in researching language. Journal of Language and Communication 13(2): 81–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dorian, N.C. 1982. Defining the speech community to include its working margins. In Sociolinguistic Variation in Speech Communities, S. Romaine (ed.), 25–33. London: Edward Arnold. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmanuel, A., Bettelheim, C. & Pearce, B. 1972. Unequal Exchange: A Study of the Imperialism of Trade. New York NY: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Everett, D. 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Current Anthropology 46: 621–646. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Pirahã culture and grammar: A response to some criticisms. Language 85: 405–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gergen, K.J., Gulerc, A., Lock, A. & Misra, G. 1996. Psychological science in cultural context. American Psychologist 51: 496–503.
Gippert, J., Himmelman, N. & Mosel, U. (eds). 2006. Essentials of Language Documentation [Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 178]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grenoble, L. & Whaley, L. 2006. Saving Languages: An Introduction to Language Revitalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grinevald, C. 2000. Los lingüistas frente a las lenguas indígenas. In As Línguas Amazônicas Hoje, F. Queixalos & O. Renault-Lescure (eds), 35–53. Saõ Paolo: IRD MPEG Instituto Socioambiental,Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Linguistique et langues mayas du Guatemala. Faits de Langues. Meso-Amerique, Caraibes, Amazonie 20(1): 17–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. A view from the field: An Amerindian view, worrying about ethics and wondering about informed consent. In Lesser Known Languages in South Asia: Status and Policies, Case Studies and Applications of Information Technology, A. Saxena & L. Borin (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grinevald, C. & Bert, M. (eds). 2010a. Linguistique de Terrain sur Langues en Danger: Locuteurs et Linguiste. Faits de Langues, 35–36. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010b. Speakers and community. In Austin & Sallabank (eds), 45–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Whose ideology, when and where: Revitalization of Rama (Nicaragua) and Francoprovençal (France). In Austin & Sallabank (eds), 357–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hallett, D., Chandler, M. & Lalonde, C. 2007. Aboriginal language knowledge and youth suicide. Cognitive Development 22: 392–399.
Himmelmann, N.P. 1998. Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics 36: 161–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Language documentation: What is it and what is it good for? In Gippert, Himmelman & Mosel (eds), 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 2014. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals, 29 July 2015. <[URL]>
Minasyan, A. 2014. UN discourse on linguistic diversity and multilingualism in the 2000s: Actor analysis, ideological foundations, and instrumental functions. In Austin & Sallabank (eds), 385–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevins, A., Pesetsky, D. & Rodrigues, C. 2009. Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment. Language 85: 355–404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newman, P. 2003. The endangered languages issue as a hopeless cause. In Language Death and Language Maintenance [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 240], M. Janse & S. Tol (eds), 1–13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharifian, F. (ed.). 2015. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woodbury, A. & England, N. 2004. Training speakers of indigenous languages of Latin America at a US university. In Language Documentation and Description, 2, P.K. Austin (ed.), 122–139. London: SOAS. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Yamane, Maxwell & Mary Phillips
2024. ‘The stories are told by us’/U.S.: politics of telling stories about Indigenous languages with (and without) music. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 45:1 ► pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
Coler, Matt
2021. Chapter 5. Exploring speech experiences. In Sensory Experiences [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 24], ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Coler, Matt
2021. Exploring speech experiences. In Sensory Experiences [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 24], ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Gonzales Castaño, Geny
2021. ¿Por qué, para qué y para quién documentar una lengua indígena? Documentación lingüística desde una perspectiva situada. Visitas al Patio 15:2 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
H. Ekkehard Wolff
2019. The Cambridge Handbook of African Linguistics, DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Further readings. In Sensory Experiences [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 24], ► pp. 577 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue