In:Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, processes and outcomes
Edited by Alexei Prikhodkine and Dennis R. Preston
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 39] 2015
► pp. 37–54
REACT – A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes
Published online: 16 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.39.02pur
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.39.02pur
This text is devoted to a new theoretical framework for (language) attitudes (REACT) integrating both the traditional idea of attitudes as (more or less stable) cognitive assessment categories and the constructivist view on attitudes as situated evaluative practices. The text discusses five constitutive elements to the theory (Relevance, Evaluation, Activation, Construction, and Targeting) against the background of respective theories: a theory of actional relevance (cf. Schütz 1970), a listener judgment theory (cf. Purschke 2011), a model for cognitive activation (cf. Kroeber-Riel et al. 2009), a constructivist symbol theory (cf. Cassirer 1953–57 |1923–29|), and a model for attitude functions (cf. Katz 1960). The paper then concludes with proposing an integrative definition of attitudes as evaluation routines in social practices that conforms to the constructivist criticism of classic attitude theory, while at the same time taking account of the fundamental structuring patterns of social interaction that also determine the structure and dynamics of attitudes.
References (53)
Albarracín, Dolores, Johnson, Blair T. & Zanna, Mark P. (eds). 2005. The Handbook of Attitudes. Mawah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Allport, Gordon. 1935. Attitudes. In A Handbook of Social Psychology, Carl Murchison (ed.), 789-844. Worcester MA: Clark University Press.
. 1967. Attitudes. In Readings in Attitude, Theory and Measurement, Martin Fishbein (ed.), 1-13. New York NY: Wiley & Sons.
Auer, Peter & di Luzio, Aldo (eds). 1992. The Contextualization of Language [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 22]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bayer, Thora Hin. 2001. Cassirer's Metaphysics of Symbolic Forms. A Philosophical Commentary. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
Bergson, Henri. 1896. Matière et mémoire. Essai sur la relation du corps à l'esprit. Paris: F. Alcan.
Cassirer, Ernst. 1953–57[1923–29]. Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, 3 Vols. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
. 1923[1910]. Der Begriff der symbolischen Form im Aufbau der Geisteswissenschaften. In Vorträge der der Bibliothek Warburg, Vol. 1, Friedrich Saxl (ed.), 11-39. Leipzig: Winter.
Cunningham, William, Zelazo, Philip David, Packer, Dominic J. & Van Bavel, Jay J. 2007. The iterative reprocessing model: A multilevel framework for attitudes and behavior. Social Cognition 25(5): 736–760.
Eagly, Alice & Chaiken, Shelly. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth TX: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 453–476.
Fazio, Russel H. 2000. Accessible attitudes as tools for object appraisal: Their costs and benefits. In Why We Evaluate: Functions of Attitudes, Gregory Maio & James Olson (eds), 1-36. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fishbein, Martin & Ajzen, Icek. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading MA:Addison-Wesley.
Gee, Philip, Stephensen, David & Wright, Donald E. 1994. Temporal discrimination learning of operant feeding in goldfish (Carassius auratus). Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior 62: 1–13.
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: CUP.
Hall, Stuart. 1997. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage.
Hartmann, Dirk. 1996. Kulturalistische Handlungstheorie. In Methodischer Kulturalismus – Zwischen Naturalismus und Postmoderne, Dirk Hartmann & Peter Janich (eds), 70-114. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1983. Introduction: Inventing traditions. In The Invention of Tradition, Eric Hobsbawm & Terence Ranger (eds), 1-14. Cambridge: CUP.
Husserl, Edmund 1982[1913]. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy – First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Translated by Fred Kersten. The Hague: Springer.
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2013. Introduction. In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), 1-28. Oxford: OUP.
Jung, Carl. 1971[1921]. Psychological Types [The collected works of C. G. Jung 6]. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kasper, Simon. 2015. Instruction Grammar. From Perception via Grammar to Action [Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 293]. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
Katz, Daniel. 1960. The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 24: 163–204.
Kroeber-Riel, Werner, Weinberg, Peter & Gröppel-Klein, Andrea. 2009. Konsumentenverhalten, 9th edn. München: Vahlen.
Markard, Morus. 1984. Einstellung. Kritik eines sozialpsychologischen Grundkonzepts. Frankfurt: Campus.
Pfaff, Donald. 2006. Brain Arousal and Information Theory: Neural and Genetic Mechanisms. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Potter, Jonathan. 1998. Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluative practices. European Review of Social Psychology 9(1):233–66.
Potter, Jonathan & Wetherell, Margaret. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.
Preston, Dennis R. 2011. The power of language regard – Discrimination, classification, comprehension, and production. Dialectologia 2: 9-33. Special issue, Production, Perception and Attitude, John Nerbonne, Stefan Grondelaers & Dirk Speelman (eds).
Purschke, Christoph. 2011. Regionalsprache und Hörerurteil. Grundzüge einer perzeptiven Variationslinguistik [Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik. Beihefte 149]. Stuttgart: Steiner.
. 2015. Das Holz, die Axt, der Hieb. Über den Zusammenhang von Einstellung und Handeln am Beispiel des Handlungsschemas ‘Holz hacken.’ In Sprache, Literatur, Raum. Festgabe für Willy Diercks, Robert Langhanke (ed.), 145-162. Bielefeld: Verlag für Regionalgeschichte.
. 2014a. “I remember it like it was interesting.” Zur Theorie von Salienz und Pertinenz. In Die Vermessung der Salienz(forschung), Helen Christen & Evelyn Ziegler (eds).
Linguistik Online
66: 31–50.
. 2014b. REACT – Einstellungen als evaluative Routinen in sozialen Praxen. In Sprechen über Sprache: Perspektiven und neue Methoden der linguistischen Einstellungsforschung, Christina Cuonz & Rebekka Studler (eds), 123-142. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.
. In preparation. Kognition, Kommunikation, Kultur – Eine Philosophie der Selbstbehauptung. Habilitation, University of Luxemburg.
Rosenberg, Milton & Hovland, Carl. 1960. Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components in attitudes. In Attitude Organization and Change: An Analysis of Consistency among Attitude Components, Carl Hovland & Milton Rosenberg (eds), 1-14. New Haven CT: Yale University Press,
Schmidt, Jürgen Erich & Herrgen, Joachim. 2011. Sprachdynamik. Eine Einführung in die moderne Regionalsprachenforschung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
Schütz, Alfred. 1970. Reflections on the Problem of Relevance, edited, annotated, and with an introduction by Richard Zaner. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
Schütz, Alfred & Luckmann, Thomas. 1973. The Structures of the Life-world, Vol. 1. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.
Simmel, Georg. 1903. Soziologie des Raumes. Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reich 27(1): 27–71.
Silverstein, Michael. 1981. The Limits of Awareness [Sociolinguistic Working Paper 84]. Austin TX: ERIC.
. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23:193–229.
Smith, Brewster, Bruner, Jerome S. & White, Robert W. 1956. Opinions and Personality. New York NY: Wiley & Sons.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Krammer, Lisa
Entringer, Nathalie, Peter Gilles, Sara Martin & Christoph Purschke
Hoffmeister, Toke
Purschke, Christoph
2017. (T)Apping the linguistic landscape. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 3:3 ► pp. 246 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
