In:Gender and Language in Sub-Saharan Africa: Tradition, struggle and change
Edited by Lilian Lem Atanga, Sibonile Edith Ellece, Lia Litosseliti and Jane Sunderland
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 33] 2013
► pp. 253–274
Chapter 12. Homophobic language and linguistic resistance in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Published online: 27 March 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.33.17msi
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.33.17msi
In this chapter I show how language can be used both to objectify those who engage in same-sex relations and to subvert homophobia and heterosexism. The chapter reflects a life history study of eight men who engage in same-sex relations, based on a series of interviews with each man. The study found that language was a key site of struggle, serving both as a mechanism for the regulation of individuals and as a vehicle for strategic ‘resist-stance’. Resist-stance was through the employment of isiNgqumo – a language predominantly spoken by Black ‘gay’ men in South Africa (Rudwick and Ntuli 2008). However, such resist-stance had its own limitations, as the language was associated with certain Communities of Practice, and was not spoken by all the men interviewed. The chapter calls for more sociolinguistic work in this area.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Thani, Glodean
Epprecht, Marc & Nomusa Mngoma
Lynch, Ingrid, Finn Reygan & Molemo Ramphalile
Ellece, Sibonile E.
Leap, William L.
Livermon, Xavier
Mfecane, Sakhumzi
Kamwendo, Gregory
Msibi, Thabo & Valenshia Jagessar
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
