In:Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems
Edited by Sara Lenninger, Olga Fischer, Christina Ljungberg and Elżbieta Tabakowska
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 18] 2022
► pp. 1–8
Introduction
Published online: 10 November 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.18.int
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.18.int
References (6)
Dingemanse, M. 2017. Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF: Language Typology and Universals 70 (2): 363–384.
Kita, S. and Özyürek, A. 2003. What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language 48: 16–32.
Peirce, C. S. 1931–58. The Collected Papers of C. S. Peirce. Vol. I–VIII, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds), vols. 7–8, A. W. Burks (ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (quoted as CP, followed by volume and paragraph number).
Sonesson, G. 1994. Prolegomena to the semiotic analysis of prehistoric visual displays. Semiotica 100 (2–4):267–332.
2016. The phenomenological semiotics of iconicity and pictoriality – including some replies to my critics. Languages and Semiotic Studies, 2 (2): 1–73.
White, J. 2007. Forms of Restricted Iconicity in Avant-Garde Poetry. In Insistent Images: Iconicity in Language and Literature 5, E. Tabakowska, C. Ljungberg and O. Fischer (eds.), 129–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.