Cover not available

In:Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems
Edited by Sara Lenninger, Olga Fischer, Christina Ljungberg and Elżbieta Tabakowska
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 18] 2022
► pp. 245–264

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Iconicity in gesture

How Czech children and adults use iconic gestures to deal with a gap between mental and linguistic representations of motion events

 | University of Toulouse Jean Jaurès
ORCiD logo with link | University of Toulouse Jean Jaurès
Published online: 10 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.18.12fib
Abstract
Our paper contributes to the discussion about iconicity by bringing attention to iconic co-speech gestures. We investigate their role in situations where mental representation becomes difficult to fully express through words only. For instance, when Czech speakers describe Motion, the lexicon most often does not allow them to verbalize Path of Motion without indicating Manner of Motion at the same time.
In this context, we asked 72 Czech children and adults to watch and describe Motion video clips where Manner was visually backgrounded in favor of Path. Although adults found a way to verbalize Path without Manner more often than children, Czech participants altogether typically verbalized both Path and Manner but they preferred to gesture about Path only. Gesturing about both Path and Manner was generally marginal and more used by adults than by children. When it occurred, gesturally conveyed Manner tended to be different from spoken Manner and closer to actually viewed Manner. We discuss the ability of creative non-arbitrary iconic gesture to modulate verbal content so that the final polysemiotic message is more satisfactory than the verbal message alone would be.
Article outline
  • 1.Iconic gesture, speech, and mind
  • 2.Gesturing when talking about motion events
  • 3.The present study: Focus on speakers of Czech
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.Questions and hypotheses
  • 6.Quantitative results
  • 7.Analysis of the results and discussion
  • 8.Summary and conclusion
  • References
References (37)
References
Colletta, J. M., Pellenq, C. and Guidetti, M. 2010. Age-related changes in co-speech gesture and narrative: Evidence from French children and adults. Speech Communication 52: 565–576. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Ruiter, J. P. 2000. The production of gesture and speech. In Language and Gesture, D. McNeill (ed), 284–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Efron, D. 1972. Gesture, Race and Culture. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. 1969. The repertoire of nonverbal behavior categories, origins, usage, and coding, Semiotica 1: 49–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fibigerova, K. and Guidetti, M. 2018. The impact of language on gesture in descriptions of voluntary motion in French and Czech adults and children. Language, Interaction et Acquisition / Language, Interaction and Acquisition 9 (1): 101–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fibigerova, K., Guidetti, M. and Šulová, L. 2012. Verbal and gestural expression of motion in French and Czech. In Space and Time across Languages and Cultures (vol.2): Language, Culture and Cognition, L. Filipović and K. M. Jaszczolt (eds), 251–268. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1978. The Language of Thought (2nd edition). Hassocks: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D. and Wagner, S. 2001. Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science 12 (6): 516–522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gullberg, M., Hendrix, H. and Hickmann, M. 2008. Learning to talk and gesture about motion in French. First Language 28 (2): 200–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickmann, M. 2006. The relativity of motion in first language acquisition. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, M. Hickmann and S. Robert (eds), 281–308. Amsterdam and Philadephia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H. and Gullberg, M. 2011. Developmental perspectives on the expression of motion in speech and gesture: A comparison of French and English. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 2 (1): 129–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hostetter, A. B. and Alibali, M. W. 2008. Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15 (3): 495–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1983. Mental Models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Kinesic Components of Multimodal Utterances. In Berkeley Linguistics Society Proceedings. Berkeley, California: Berkeley Linguistics Society. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S. 2000. How representational gestures help speaking. In Language and Gesture, D. McNeill (ed), 162–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S. and Özyürek, A. 2003. What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language 48: 16–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. and Wilkins, D. 2006. Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malá, M. 2015. Translation counterparts as indicators of the boundaries of units of meaning: A contrastive view of the position of ‘come V-ing’ among the patterns of the verb ‘come’. In Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Verb Constructions, S. Oksefjell Ebeling and H. Hasselgård (eds), 169–191. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinková, M. 2018. K tzv. sémantické typologii jazyků: Co česká slovesa pohybu mohou vypovídat o angličtině a španělštině. Studie z Aplikované Lingvistiky 2: 37–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Gesture and Thought. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. and Duncan, S. 2000. Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In Language and Gesture, D. McNeill (ed), 141–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melinger, A. and Kita, S. 2007. Conceptualisation load triggers gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes 22 (4): 473–500. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morsella, E. and Krauss, R. M. 2004. The role of gestures in spatial working memory and Speech. The American Journal of Psychology 117 (3): 411–424. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Naidu, V., Zlatev, J., Duggirala, V., Van De Weijer, J., Devylder, S. and Blomberg, J. 2018. Holistic spatial semantics and post-Talmian motion event typology: A case study of Thai and Telugu. Cognitive Semiotics 11 (2): 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nöth, W. 1990. Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R. and Ishizuka, T. 2008. Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology 44 (4): 1040–1054. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paivio, A. 1986. Mental Representation: A Dual Coding Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, Ch. S. 1960. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce 1931–1958. Ch. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds). Cambridge: The Belknap of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pokorný, J. 2010. Lingvistická Antropologie: Jazyk, Mysl, Kultura. Prague: Grada Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, S. Stromqvist and L. Verhoeven (eds), 219–257. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, M. Hickmann and S. Robert (eds), 59–81. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical form. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description (vol. 3): Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed), 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Towards a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue