In:Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems
Edited by Sara Lenninger, Olga Fischer, Christina Ljungberg and Elżbieta Tabakowska
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 18] 2022
► pp. 193–212
This is not a pipe
Iconicity in Magritte’s language paintings
Published online: 10 November 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.18.10cab
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.18.10cab
Abstract
A significant part of René Magritte’s pictorial work is devoted to the challenging relationships between images and written words. In this paper, I will look into two series of Magritte’s language paintings addressing these relationships: The Treachery of Images (also known as This is not a pipe) and The Interpretation of Dreams. In both series, painted images of written words and phrases are juxtaposed to painted images of objects in order to show that words and images should not be taken as the real objects they depict or refer to. I will show that, in addition to this obvious interpretation, there are much more interesting and challenging issues concerning the iconicity of the relationships between written words and the images depicting the objects denoted by them in Magritte’s paintings. To illustrate this point, I will elaborate on the calligram approach to the Treachery of Images proposed by Michel Foucault and Douglas Hofstadter by exploring the subliminal iconic relationships between the image of the pipe and the shape of the letters in the painted sentence (ceci n’est pas une pipe ‘this is not a pipe’). In addition, I will show that this analysis can be extended to the paintings entitled The Interpretation of Dreams. These analyses might shed a new light on these enigmatic works of art.
Article outline
- 1.Magritte’s words and images
- 2.This is not a pipe: Magritte’s view
- 3.This is not a pipe: The subliminal iconicity of an unraveled calligram
- 4.Dismantling the pipe in the painted sentence
- 5.The interpretation of dreams
- 6.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (15)
De Cuypere, L. 2008. Limiting the Iconic: From the metatheoretical foundations to creative possibilities of iconicity in language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Frege, G. 1884. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine logisch mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau: W. Koebner.
Lüdeking, K. 1996. Die Wörter und die Bilder und die Dinge. Magritte und Foucault. In René Magritte. Die Kunst der Konversation, M. Broodthaers, J. Kosuth, B. Bloom and R. G. Sturtevant (eds.), 58–72. New York: Prestel
Magritte, R. 1929. Les mots et les images. La Révolution Surréaliste, 12: 32–33 [English translation in Rooney and Plattner (eds.) 2016: 33–34]
Meister, C. 2004. Les mots et les images: Eine optische Maschine von René Magritte. Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte, 67: 115–130.
Nänny, M. 1999. Alphabetic letters as Icons in Literary Texts. In Form miming meaning. [Iconicity in Language and Literature 1], M. Nänny and O. Fischer (eds.), 173–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ottinger, D. 2017. Ut pictura philosophia. In Magritte. The Treachery of Images, O. Ottinger (ed.), 15–23. Paris: Centre Pompidou.
Rooney, K. and Plattner, E. (eds.) 2016. René Magritte. Selected writings. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
